This has been done to death guys, we've had plenty of suggestions, few of them actually workable. I'm moving this to Resource Centre, if you'd like to contribute then do, but generally speaking I don't see anything coming out of this.

Firstly, it was me who deleted your post, digilife. Don't like it? Don't flame.

Secondly, I will say this once and for all - No collecting of ICs. So whatever suggetsions you have, please be sure to forget that.

The ratio of safe traders being caught up in scandals is almost nil so I don't see why we have to break that. We won't be abolishing the Safe Trader system anytime soon, in fact, we have been very stringent on the requirements of late.

Other than that, I have no idea what you're talking about, if you cared to put forth your points in logical sequence with proper typing and paragraphing, it would make it a lot easier and pleasing for the admins (who have plenty of other work to do) to read and consider.

I've repeated this over and over again. So many suggestions are drastic and require plenty of work (be it coding or supervision). Ask yourself if its really worth it. Are there *that* many cons at LYN to warrant this? How many threads are there in dispute resolution that are conjobs rather than misunderstandings or petty FFK issues? If you ask me, its making a mountain of a molehill.