QUOTE(jchue73 @ Dec 17 2015, 02:27 PM)
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Dec 17 2015, 02:34 PM)
Some review said old 24-70 is sharper than VR version. Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.25, D500 out now
|
|
Dec 17 2015, 02:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#81
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2015, 03:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#82
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Dec 17 2015, 02:51 PM) Yes, the new one has VR. There's only one VR version because the original 24-70mm f/2.8G like yours never had VR. Big hole in your pocket yo. Actually very slight sharpness difference in the centre which the older model is better. But edge to edge performance the VR version is better. And even that it's at wide open. Smaller apertures and the difference is gone. A lot of people update not because of the better optics but more for faster focusing and VR function. The only cons for me is the VR is heavier, longer, 82mm filter and more importantly more expensive than the original 24-70mm f/2.8G. But having VR is an advantage there. |
|
|
Dec 17 2015, 04:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#83
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(Vox @ Dec 17 2015, 04:27 PM) Very thanks for all brothers giving out explanation to beginner like me. 24-70mm above 4k. I wish I would go for the Nikon 17-55mm. However, budget constraints and I need it quite urgently (travelling soon). May I know 24-70mm f2.8 how much it will cost? (2nd hand or third party). I would really consider if its still under my "serious budget" wise. As I believe it has same quality image but wider zoom range. (even more versatile than the 17-55mm during travel). Thanks in advance! |
|
|
Dec 17 2015, 04:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#84
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2016, 09:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#85
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Jan 6 2016, 07:41 AM) The wait has finally come to an end, ladies and gentlemen, the D500 is here! The spec much better than my D600. Just D500 is DX format. Not sure if i should be happy or not This post has been edited by wkwong91: Jan 6 2016, 10:06 AM |
|
|
Jan 6 2016, 01:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#86
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
Price for D500 in Malaysia.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6 2016, 05:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#87
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2016, 07:52 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#88
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(kiasu6 @ Jan 6 2016, 05:36 PM) U need to add to cart only can see the price yo. Then u will get a shock. QUOTE(Everdying @ Jan 6 2016, 05:52 PM) Yeah. If that is the actual price I rather take D750. |
|
|
Jan 16 2016, 08:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#89
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(BaRT @ Jan 16 2016, 08:14 PM) Using D610 for almost 2 years. Feel a bit frustrated. Somehow i feel my previous D90 is better in term of photo quality (sharpness, noise, colour, etc). are u serious bro? Haihhh...im using 28-300mm lens now. Perhaps, change to tamron 24-70 can have significant different? I was using D90 and upgraded to D600. Seem alot of different in term of sharpness, noise n colour. |
|
|
Jan 17 2016, 11:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#90
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(BaRT @ Jan 17 2016, 10:33 AM) Dont know la bro. Thats the way suppose to be. Waa. Sure bo? Regarding the sharpness, have I try ur D610 with another lens?Maybe I still not master on 610. Not sure where got wrong. Still not satisfy with the photo. Sometime when im using low iso (100/200), my photo still got noise...haihhhh |
|
|
Feb 8 2016, 01:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#91
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 8 2016, 01:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#92
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
Gong Xi Fa Cai! Happy Chinese New Year!
|
|
|
Feb 8 2016, 10:52 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#93
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2016, 05:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#94
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(d@odao @ Feb 15 2016, 04:55 PM) Not wanting to get another fx body. Will the D7200 heavy for ur wife? Since she is using mirrorless now. lolThis d7200 is to replace my mirrorless that is in the drybox. And, mostly for my wife lor. I will not consider d5500 due to lack of control dial. Sometime will use it for wildlife too. |
|
|
Feb 15 2016, 05:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#95
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(d@odao @ Feb 15 2016, 05:16 PM) Nevermind, let her build some muscles . 😀 Haha. But some female doesn't like to carry dslr at all. Last time she used to shoot with d7000. That is more heavier. Actually, dslr is not that heavy if use the right way to carry it. Never hang the camera around the neck lor. Ngam mou. 🙄 If ur wife doesn't mind of the weight then should be not a problem. |
|
|
Feb 15 2016, 09:02 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#96
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(d@odao @ Feb 15 2016, 05:50 PM) Yes, correct. Some female doesn't like dslr. Yeah. That right! I have to get additional batteries for my gf's mirrorless. But mirrorless sucks battery life like dracula sucking bloods. QUOTE(jchue73 @ Feb 15 2016, 06:02 PM) Ok. Yeah. But then I am not use to it even though I have mirrorless. LOL... Actually best for casual shooting is to get a good PnS camera like the Sony RX100. Or a good mobile phone that takes good pics. Btw, RX100 is a good PnS cam. |
|
|
Feb 15 2016, 09:02 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#97
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2016, 10:27 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#98
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2016, 10:50 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#99
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2016, 11:41 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#100
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(ogiveyakuza @ Feb 23 2016, 10:52 PM) If u don't mind of the smaller apperture of 16-85mm like what the sifus said, then get this lens. U can try Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 vc or non-vc too, either one is good and sharper than Sigma 17-70 (based on my experience). If u are getting Sigma, make sure u take the OS HSM version. Just my 2 cent. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0272sec
0.39
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 02:53 AM |