deleted
This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 6 2015, 09:18 PM
LYN Catholic Fellowship V01 (Group), For Catholics (Roman or Eastern)
LYN Catholic Fellowship V01 (Group), For Catholics (Roman or Eastern)
|
|
Mar 6 2015, 09:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
deleted
This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 6 2015, 09:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 7 2015, 11:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 7 2015, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(solder_joint @ Mar 7 2015, 11:16 AM) Another catholic here.. From Sabah, Stella Maris church Tg.Aru.. currently taking my master degree in batu pahat.. Now I attend mass in St Henry Batu Pahat and once a month in St Joseph Victoria Street, Singapore for Traditional Latin Mass/Extraordinary Form mass Are you Shurl? |
|
|
Mar 8 2015, 10:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 9 2015, 04:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(subimpact @ Mar 9 2015, 03:58 PM) Catholics don't believe that the pope is a divine being. However, the teaching of papal infallibility says that the Holy Spirit will protect the Pope from error when defining an article of faith intending to bind all the faithful.For the Holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine, but that, by his assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith transmitted by the apostles. Indeed, their apostolic teaching was embraced by all the venerable fathers and reverenced and followed by all the holy orthodox doctors, for they knew very well that this See of St. Peter always remains unblemished by any error, in accordance with the divine promise of our Lord and Savior to the prince of his disciples: "I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail; and when you have turned again, strengthen your brethren." - Pastor Aeternus. Of course we believe the Pope is human and can make mistakes, but not when he intends to bind all the faithful to believe in an article of faith. For example, Pope John Paul II teaching that the Church has no power to ordain women. Or Pope Pius XII defining the dogma of the Assumption of Mary into Heaven, which is not a new teaching but has always been believed by the Church for ages. This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 9 2015, 04:10 PM |
|
|
Mar 9 2015, 04:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2015, 04:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(khool @ Mar 9 2015, 04:25 PM) For the record, the Pope's infallibility only extends to 'ex-Cathedra', i.e. he needs to be sitting in the chair of St. Peter in the Cathedral when pronouncing doctrine. Ermm....ex-Cathedra is the Latin meaning from the chair, but it doesn't necessarily mean he needs to be actually sitting down on his throne.His pronunciations must be based on Church documents, encyclicals, papal bulls, and especially the Catechism of the Catholic Church. In addition, the college of Cardinals and Synods must be held before these pronunciation are made. And always, all these must be related to matters of Christian / Catholic faith. Outside of that circumstance, he can still be subject to human error. It is not correct to say that he must consult the college of Cardinals and Synods before pronouncing anything infallibly. The power of the Pope is even above that of Ecumenical Councils, Cardinals, Synods. It just needs to be related to matters of faith and morals and in accordance with the the constant Tradition of the Church or Scripture. See The Pope Picture of Pius XII defining the Assumption of Mary: ![]() Picture of Pius IX defining the Immaculate Conception: ![]() This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 9 2015, 04:38 PM |
|
|
Mar 9 2015, 04:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(khool @ Mar 9 2015, 04:38 PM) That is true, he can make pronunciations solo, that is his right, however if the pope were to announce that tomorrow day is night and night is day, everyone would not be obligated to listen to him. Yes but if he defines tomorrow day is night and night is day, that is not related to faith and morals.... but as a matter of Sacred Tradition, that is Tradition with a capital "T", such pronunciations are made from the Chair, with counsel from the College of Cardinals and Synods. |
|
|
Mar 9 2015, 04:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 9 2015, 05:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 9 2015, 11:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
A well-sung and well-known hymn sung in Catholic churches during Lent.
|
|
|
Mar 10 2015, 11:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(de1929 @ Mar 10 2015, 10:31 AM) may i ask You think the present Pope still have a big territories (Papal States) and army now? LOL....If you are referring to the First Crusades preached by Urban II, then it was a response to the Muslim invasion and occupation of Jerusalem and the harassment of pilgrims going to the Holy Places. Also this is not part of faith and morals so his actions would be dependent on whether they are based on just war theory, self defence, etc. Now that you mentioned this topic, I think a Crusade is relevant now to repel ISIS based on what they have been doing so far. But that would be far-fetched considering the international political scene today. |
|
|
Mar 10 2015, 12:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(de1929 @ Mar 10 2015, 11:53 AM) hahaha... i am referring to word papal infallibility. As mentioned above it has nothing to do with infallibility. It should be considered in the light of Church teaching on just war, self-defence, etc. If someone claims he or she has instructions from the Holy Spirit, etc, then there must be an unmistakable sign to prove that. The Catholic Church is very particular about alleged miracles, signs, prophecies. All these are judged by the Church in light of constant Church teaching, Sacred Tradition, Scripture... to be sure that there are no diabolical forces at work.I think when pope has instruction from Holy Spirit to do declare war like my point above, then people should think that under provision of Holy Spirit, there will be a supplies of need and blessing (of course additional tanks n guns what do u think ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2015, 12:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(de1929 @ Mar 10 2015, 12:50 PM) so if pope (not someone else), who is with bestowed papal infallibility, got instruction from HS about declaring a war, will the church still consider pope instruction ? How do you know he got instruction from HS? And certainly have to consider based on the principles mentioned earlier.This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 10 2015, 12:53 PM |
|
|
Mar 10 2015, 12:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
Yo Catholic brothers and sisters, today is the beginning of the nine-day novena (up till his feast day on March 18) to Saint Joseph, Patron of the Universal Church, and Protector of the Holy Family.
![]() Novena to St. Joseph *NOVENA PRAYER *(prayer to be said at the end of each day's devotion) Saint Joseph, I, your unworthy child, greet you. You are the faithful protector and intercessor of all who love and venerate you. You know that I have special confidence in you and that, after Jesus and Mary, I place all my hope of salvation in you, for you are especially powerful with God and will never abandon your faithful servants. Therefore I humbly invoke you and commend myself, with all who are dear to me and all that belong to me, to your intercession. I beg of you, by your love for Jesus and Mary, not to abandon me during life and to assist me at the hour of my death. Glorious Saint Joseph, spouse of the Immaculate Virgin, obtain for me a pure, humble, charitable mind, and perfect resignation to the divine Will. Be my guide, my father, and my model through life that I may merit to die as you did in the arms of Jesus and Mary. Loving Saint Joseph, faithful follower of Jesus Christ, I raise my heart to you to implore your powerful intercession in obtaining from the Divine Heart of Jesus all the graces necessary for my spiritual and temporal welfare, particularly the grace of a happy death, and the special grace I now implore: (Mention your request). Guardian of the Word Incarnate, I feel confident that your prayers in my behalf will be graciously heard before the throne of God. Amen. MEMORARE Remember, most pure spouse of Mary, ever Virgin, my loving protector, Saint Joseph, that no one ever had recourse to your protection or asked for your aid without obtaining relief. Confiding, therefore, in your goodness, I come before you and humbly implore you. Despise not my petitions, foster-father of the Redeemer, but graciously receive them. Amen. Source: EWTN This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 10 2015, 12:57 PM |
|
|
Mar 10 2015, 02:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(de1929 @ Mar 10 2015, 02:21 PM) Just trust. If we have to consider "principles mentioned earlier".... then it's difficult to trust isn't it ? God gave you a mind to think reasonably too..lol.Who are we to examine pope ? Let me give an analogy. If a politician tells you to that he intends to table a motion for a particular law in Parliament, certainly he also has to present facts and figures in order to get support. Same goes for your question since the issue at hand is not related to Faith or morals, but to prudential judgement which needs to be determined based on the principles mentioned before. Back to your supposed scenario, if the principles of just war, self-defense etc are fulfilled, then I don't see any reason not to agree. But if I see those principles are not fulfilled, then yes, a Catholic may disagree and still remain a faithful Catholic. A recent case was the invasion of Iraq by the US forces to overthrow Saddam Hussein. President Bush claimed it was due to chemical/nuclear weapons etc, but then Pope John Paul II was very much against the invasion because the principles of just war is just not there. There was no evidence of chemical/nuclear weapons in the aftermath of the invasion and the situation of Iraq just proved that the Pope was right. On the other hand, those who claimed the invasion was justified because of Saddam's 'potential' of having chemical/nuclear weapons cannot be defended because that would be falling into the sin of presumption. Hope this helps. This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 10 2015, 02:43 PM |
|
|
Mar 10 2015, 03:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(de1929 @ Mar 10 2015, 03:08 PM) dude... do you know in a simple political arena... we just let the people know what they need to know... that's the 1st point. For your 1st point, you assume that there would be no questions? 2nd point: nobody knows the whole truth except GOD himself. I bet... not all truth is published in google. 3rd point: How do you know that Amazon.com will not reveal another truth tomorrow ? in essence, only GOD possess tomorrow and knows what will happen tomorrow... divine being maaa Therefore i choose to humble, if pope claims himself he got instruction from HS ... then i just obey. 2nd point: Yes, but God can choose to reveal the truth to whomever He wants and in the manner that He has said. No contradictions there. I don't understand your 3rd point and how it relates to Amazon.com. I agree that only God knows what will happen tomorrow. But I don't see what you are trying to drive at with what we are talking about. Humility vs. willful ignorance vs. stupidity are vastly different things, you know? This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 10 2015, 03:17 PM |
|
|
Mar 10 2015, 04:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(de1929 @ Mar 10 2015, 03:59 PM) point no 3 is something relates to future, but irrational for today. But if you don't do it today, then the utopia future will not happen. "You have been revealed"? What is that supposed to mean? Are you claiming to be a prophet? Also..it seems you are equating humble people with stupid people. Sheesh.This is where all smart people fails to see, because for "smart people": today is irrational therefore future is out of question. I have been revealed that trust to GOD does look stupid for "smart people". This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 10 2015, 04:03 PM |
|
|
Mar 10 2015, 04:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(de1929 @ Mar 10 2015, 04:45 PM) oh sorry... i have been revealed meaning i just learned recently. nothing more. Alright, how can you be sure that GOD revealed it to so and so? It will be the same question I ask every Protestant regarding the founding of their various churches/denominations/sects. claiming to be prophet... definitely no. equating humble people with stupid people... no... actually the other thinking so i don't equate humble people with stupid people... btw do you mind point out which post i equate humble people with stupid people ? perhaps i overlook something. i will apology if i equate humble people with stupid people. Every Christian ought not to be simply taken for a ride. "Dearly beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits if they be of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world." 1 John 4:1 "Who said: Take heed you be not seduced; for many will come in my name, saying, I am he; and the time is at hand: go ye not therefore after them. " Luke 21:8 "Behold I send you as sheep in the midst of wolves. Be ye therefore wise as serpents and simple as doves." Matthew 10:16 This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 10 2015, 05:14 PM |
|
|
Mar 10 2015, 05:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,577 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(de1929 @ Mar 10 2015, 05:41 PM) Well, Protestant does have problems cuz they don't have pope right ? so the term papal infallibility does not apply to them. LOL...we Catholics don't make the claim that the Holy Spirit only speaks exclusively to the Pope. Again, I hope you get my points above. Test every claim, test every spirit.what i think, you can count your blessing as chatolic believes that pope can hear to HS. Therefore chatolic can spend time to do other things instead of trying to listen to HS. Outsourcing maaa Do you know how many problems non catholic have because they don't have pope ? therefore because they cannot listen to HS like pope, they have to come out with sooooooooooooooooooooo many rules / ethics code to justify all their action. Pitty isn't it ? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.1412sec
0.60
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 11:05 PM |