Feb 11 2015, 09:27 AM
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Feb 11 2015, 08:47 AM)
The last bit is quite irony. You'll see the comment if Paultan really did a control test. They will rubbish it and ask for 'real-world' test to use Saga and Myvi. 
The fact still doesn't change that using higher number RON give benefit for normal engine compression ratio. What i believe is the different additives added to the fuel itself that produce different result. Not the RON.
For me its a damn good test. The fact still doesn't change that using higher number RON give benefit for normal engine compression ratio. What i believe is the different additives added to the fuel itself that produce different result. Not the RON.
Actual environment.. Same route.. Same jam or not..
Driver A might be more heavy footed than driver B. Thats why they swap to average it out. The key point is the car maintain same fuel. its a real life test. Control environment result are like what manufacturer advertise lo.. most oso cant get those figurea what
ppl use ron97 have to justify the cost differences ma
Quote
0.0120sec
0.57
6 queries
GZIP Disabled