Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V15, Gong Xi Fa Cai; Huat ah

views
     
ayanami_tard
post Jan 26 2015, 11:48 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
buying taiwan military equipment? langkah mayat prc dulu laugh.gif
ayanami_tard
post Jan 26 2015, 11:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
we bought several stuff from korea. our KMIFV to training ships recently
ayanami_tard
post Jan 26 2015, 11:54 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Jan 26 2015, 12:51 PM)
Welcome back to military tered, long time no see
*
lepak mp.net ngan 4c**n /k/ lagi best
ayanami_tard
post Jan 26 2015, 03:10 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
Jernas is a shorads, so can considered as point defence ( alongside manpads/AAA). for long range we have Su-30MKM and whatever is going to replace the MiGs.

What we're looking for is Medium range SAM
ayanami_tard
post Jan 26 2015, 05:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
we're talking about new design vs someting that has been flying since b4 our own independence here. ofc there gonna be setbacks
ayanami_tard
post Jan 26 2015, 10:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
depends lar. thats purely for acquisition budget or include with overhead budget. right now i'd prefer if MAF try to close the obvious hole in our capability rather than trying to introduce new one. besides we shouldnt compare with indon anyway.
ayanami_tard
post Jan 28 2015, 12:01 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
I prefer propeller aircraft as mpa. cn-235 would be nice,easy on the logistic ...


....heh logistic, the hell am i talking
ayanami_tard
post Jan 28 2015, 12:01 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
I prefer propeller aircraft as mpa. cn-235 would be nice,easy on the logistic ...


....heh logistic, the hell am i talking
ayanami_tard
post Jan 28 2015, 06:50 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
which is why i dun like the idea of malaysia buying china made stuff beyond tactical level(atgm, manpads, rpg rounds,etcetc). not only they tend to be inferior in quality,there is also the added risk of conflicting interest between us and them.
ayanami_tard
post Jan 28 2015, 08:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
can upgrade to UH-60L ah?
ayanami_tard
post Jan 28 2015, 08:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
the free choppers i mean
ayanami_tard
post Jan 28 2015, 09:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Jan 28 2015, 10:21 PM)
upgrade more money..
*
definitely not as costly as buying a new one outright and we can release funds for other asset acquisition
ayanami_tard
post Jan 30 2015, 01:37 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
is it even confirm or not..

btw can local company like ctrm do upgrade for them blackhawk? things like flir and nvg-capable cockpits.

p/s: looks like these ex rbaf blackhawks is the only ones we'll get (for free) since nz is going to get them ex austrian ones. I'd rather see more EC725 than fresh UH-60

This post has been edited by ayanami_tard: Jan 30 2015, 01:38 AM
ayanami_tard
post Feb 1 2015, 04:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
i tot psc-nd already licence produce L118 gun?

still,cant beat oto melara in term of transpotability. where to find 105m gun that can be disassembled into 11 pieces and reassemble in a matter of minutes?

QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 1 2015, 05:45 PM)
Mig29?
*
Them Skyhawks.
ayanami_tard
post Feb 3 2015, 08:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Feb 3 2015, 08:43 PM)
Australia want to buy the Soryu. The Abe government seems to agree, but the Japanese Navy is reluctant to let the Australian to have the sub. Apparently, some of the technologies in the sub is decades ahead of anything that Australia can some up with, and the Japanese Military don't want to share the secret.
*
unless the sub can turn into a giant robot(or a high school girl),i don't think they are that much advanced. granted the RAN only have them faulty collin class SSK, but they could get less faulty ones from South Korea. cheaper and faster to build as well

Them saying that they wont gonna help Japan in the event of China Japan war that made japanese top brass to be reluctant to share strategic assets with them

This post has been edited by ayanami_tard: Feb 3 2015, 08:14 PM
ayanami_tard
post Feb 3 2015, 08:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
beggars, the lot of them. have they no shame?
ayanami_tard
post Feb 3 2015, 08:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 3 2015, 09:30 PM)
german 214 is not far behind.. given it german, they will sell as long u have the money  tongue.gif
*
or if youre Israel , you could always play the guilt card and ask them fancy stuff for free...(and ask them to throw in a couple more stuff while youre at it)

This post has been edited by ayanami_tard: Feb 3 2015, 08:36 PM
ayanami_tard
post Feb 3 2015, 08:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Feb 3 2015, 09:43 PM)
heh, I remember you post a countryball satire about this long ago?
repost it pls
*
aku carik kt mp.net sat..
ayanami_tard
post Feb 3 2015, 09:56 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Feb 3 2015, 09:49 PM)
carik...
*


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
ayanami_tard
post Feb 3 2015, 10:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
that is older polandball works, way before the standardization decree by the first polandball council.

newer one look like this


http://i.imgur.com/MJVIkNJ.png

5 Pages  1 2 3 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0644sec    0.67    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:41 PM