Military Thread V15, Gong Xi Fa Cai; Huat ah
Military Thread V15, Gong Xi Fa Cai; Huat ah
|
|
Jan 26 2015, 11:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
buying taiwan military equipment? langkah mayat prc dulu
|
|
|
Jan 26 2015, 11:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
we bought several stuff from korea. our
|
|
|
Jan 26 2015, 11:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2015, 03:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
Jernas is a shorads, so can considered as point defence ( alongside manpads/AAA). for long range we have Su-30MKM and whatever is going to replace the MiGs.
What we're looking for is Medium range SAM |
|
|
Jan 26 2015, 05:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
we're talking about new design vs someting that has been flying since b4 our own independence here. ofc there gonna be setbacks
|
|
|
Jan 26 2015, 10:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
depends lar. thats purely for acquisition budget or include with overhead budget. right now i'd prefer if MAF try to close the obvious hole in our capability rather than trying to introduce new one. besides we shouldnt compare with indon anyway.
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 12:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
I prefer propeller aircraft as mpa. cn-235 would be nice,easy on the logistic ...
....heh logistic, the hell am i talking |
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 12:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
I prefer propeller aircraft as mpa. cn-235 would be nice,easy on the logistic ...
....heh logistic, the hell am i talking |
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 06:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
which is why i dun like the idea of malaysia buying china made stuff beyond tactical level(atgm, manpads, rpg rounds,etcetc). not only they tend to be inferior in quality,there is also the added risk of conflicting interest between us and them.
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 08:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
can upgrade to UH-60L ah?
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 08:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
the free choppers i mean
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 09:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 01:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
is it even confirm or not..
btw can local company like ctrm do upgrade for them blackhawk? things like flir and nvg-capable cockpits. p/s: looks like these ex rbaf blackhawks is the only ones we'll get (for free) since nz is going to get them ex austrian ones. I'd rather see more EC725 than fresh UH-60 This post has been edited by ayanami_tard: Jan 30 2015, 01:38 AM |
|
|
Feb 1 2015, 04:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 08:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Feb 3 2015, 08:43 PM) Australia want to buy the Soryu. The Abe government seems to agree, but the Japanese Navy is reluctant to let the Australian to have the sub. Apparently, some of the technologies in the sub is decades ahead of anything that Australia can some up with, and the Japanese Military don't want to share the secret. unless the sub can turn into a giant robot(or a high school girl),i don't think they are that much advanced. granted the RAN only have them faulty collin class SSK, but they could get less faulty ones from South Korea. cheaper and faster to build as wellThem saying that they wont gonna help Japan in the event of China Japan war that made japanese top brass to be reluctant to share strategic assets with them This post has been edited by ayanami_tard: Feb 3 2015, 08:14 PM |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 08:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
beggars, the lot of them. have they no shame?
|
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 08:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 3 2015, 09:30 PM) or if youre Israel , you could always play the guilt card and ask them fancy stuff for free...(and ask them to throw in a couple more stuff while youre at it)This post has been edited by ayanami_tard: Feb 3 2015, 08:36 PM |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 08:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 09:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 10:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
that is older polandball works, way before the standardization decree by the first polandball council.
newer one look like this http://i.imgur.com/MJVIkNJ.png |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0644sec
0.67
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:41 PM |