Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Radeon™ Discussion V12, Latest - 14.12 | WHQL - 14.12

views
     
chocobo7779
post Jun 18 2015, 08:45 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
Bad news for those who want to build a gaming HTPC for 4K gaming...

http://www.techpowerup.com/213575/amd-fiji...-0-support.html

Fiji chips do not support HDMI 2.0... sweat.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 18 2015, 10:31 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jun 18 2015, 10:11 PM)
dude.. DP1.2 i am rocking 4K at 60 hz since last year...
*
TV bro... icon_idea.gif

4K monitors won't be a problem since they have DPs... icon_idea.gif

Still, anyone fancy of a portable gaming rig with this card and ASRock's X99E-ITX? brows.gif

This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Jun 18 2015, 10:34 PM
chocobo7779
post Jun 18 2015, 10:37 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
I wonder whether the R9 Nano's efficiency made it to laptops... Imagine a gaming laptop with HBM memory with compact form factor... brows.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 23 2015, 08:52 AM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
I think you guys should chill down - It's good to have your own opinion, but do you guys seriously need to go that far? sweat.gif

Anyway, it's good to see that Freesync is taking off:
http://www.techpowerup.com/213699/samsung-...technology.html

Will Unseen83 upgrade his monitor tho this? brows.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 23 2015, 11:57 AM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(sentlon @ Jun 23 2015, 11:49 AM)
I thought some one have obtained thier Fury X.
Why still no benchmark?
*
Under NDA... hmm.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 10:35 AM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jun 24 2015, 10:22 AM)
Aren't you already on 2 Titan X? Why get another pair of 980 Ti?

By the way, thailand's review of Fury X:
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/article/amd-r...096-bit-review/

Fury X is way behind in that review.
*
Database error? blink.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 11:36 AM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jun 24 2015, 10:36 AM)
Keep clicking, the site is hammered haha.
*
So the rumor that the Fury X is slower than the 980Ti does hold some credibility.... hmm.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 11:37 AM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jun 24 2015, 10:22 AM)
Aren't you already on 2 Titan X? Why get another pair of 980 Ti?

By the way, thailand's review of Fury X:
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/article/amd-r...096-bit-review/

Fury X is way behind in that review.
*
Error 404... Looks like they have taken down the review.... sweat.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 11:49 AM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jun 24 2015, 11:44 AM)
If you keep using the 290, better overclock the fx8350 and wait for  skylake. But just changing to i5 will give you more performance definitely, probably even more in cpu limited games. maybe can get 5-20% higher fps in some games? not really sure.
For my 290's overclock, I only add +31 mV in afterburner
*
When will the NDA gets lifted?
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 07:18 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 24 2015, 07:10 PM)
[attachmentid=4499765]
Fury oc oc margin 7%. Richard huddy was right. Oc monster
*
Where did you get this? rclxub.gif

BTW, the benchmarks have been leaked:
http://wccftech.com/amd-fury-digitialstorm...ead-heat-titan/

This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Jun 24 2015, 07:19 PM
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 08:48 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 24 2015, 08:28 PM)
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardw...arrives-21.html
Only reviewer worth reading

Conclusion.
Something off with oc3d crysis 3... Anyway dont like him. So dont bother

The card trades blows with 980ti n is king for
Fc4, acu, .. ( both has amd tesselation optimised drivers.. So lol.. We know that from 390x drivers.. They reduced the tessalation.. So not apple to apple)

Thief, Metro LL

Suprise it can do 4k. Now just have to see gamers actualy performance whether there is stutter.
*
So it lags behind the 980Ti and the Titan X is some games, but outperforms both cards in other games? hmm.gif

Interesting nonetheless, considering it is the first card to use HBM... hmm.gif

Also one thing - it looks like the Fury X isn't really a good overclocker... hmm.gif

This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Jun 24 2015, 08:50 PM
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 08:55 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jun 24 2015, 08:52 PM)
Tomshardware does good power consumption measurements
interesting to see that Fury X uses 220+ watts only. better than 980 Ti.
*
Could be nice for a mini-ITX build though - imagine putting this beast in a Silverstone SG13? brows.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 08:56 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
So the conclusion is:

Solid card, but isn't particularly impressive, though it's pretty nice to see some new tech on the table. hmm.gif

This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Jun 24 2015, 08:56 PM
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 09:24 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Jun 24 2015, 09:09 PM)
i would say 980Ti = R9 Fury X in terms of performance.

Both may have different values in other department, in terms of acoustic, power consumption, form factor etc.  I would go for Fury X if im looking at the performance alone.  But as im seeking different values, i would hold my purchase for new GPU.
*
For me, I'll get the Fury X, mainly for the form factor... hmm.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 09:32 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Jun 24 2015, 09:27 PM)
Beats both the Titan X and GTX980Ti in a few games,loses out to the Titan X and GTX980Ti in some games.

I wonder what will be the reaction of people who just bought the R9 Fury X lol. laugh.gif
*
...and loses out quite a margin though... hmm.gif

Still it would be very interesting to see how the card 'grows' over time - as more software and driver optimizations are applied on this card. hmm.gif

AMD GPUs tend to age very well - their cards can be quite competitive performance-wise even though the architecture themselves are pretty old. tongue.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 09:33 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jun 24 2015, 09:33 PM)
eh Fury’s massive memory bandwidth gives it the advantage at 3840x2160. " i think i make right choice for my 4K lcd biggrin.gif
*
Want to go 5K in the future? brows.gif brows.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 09:42 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Jun 24 2015, 09:41 PM)
Inb4 next big AMD driver update = 30% performance increase. laugh.gif  tongue.gif

Yeah,rockin' the Pitcairn,R7 265. laugh.gif
290X at RM750.. shocking.gif
*
I have a feeling that AMD may came out with a driver that increases performance significantly - still remember Catalyst 12.11? icon_idea.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 09:44 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 24 2015, 09:42 PM)
Put nvidia aside.. Wheres the 50% faster than 290x.
In the presentation that was the base gpu comparison.
*
relative to which game? hmm.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 09:54 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Jun 24 2015, 09:52 PM)
I didn't watched the presentation..not sure if there's a replay of it. sweat.gif

Looks like 20-25% faster than the 290X.
Catalyst 12.11? yawn.gif Not even into PC at that time. whistling.gif
Oh yeah,where's Acid? tongue.gif
*
Still, it's a pretty interesting card indeed, even though the performance isn't really up to expectations. icon_idea.gif

It will be very intriguing to see how HBM is going to be the basis for future AMD/nVidia GPUs. hmm.gif

Having new technology on the table is always a good thing. Wish we have new tech on the CPU front, which is sorely lacking right now. shakehead.gif
chocobo7779
post Jun 24 2015, 10:05 PM

Power is nothing without control
********
All Stars
14,673 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Jun 24 2015, 09:58 PM)
Yeah,a high-end card that is short.Kinda weird TBH. biggrin.gif

No more GDDRx.But i think NVidia GPUs will use HBM2..and use GDDR5 until HBM2 comes out.

Wait for AMD Zen... brows.gif Broadwell and Skylake..the only improvement i like is the iGP. doh.gif
*
Which is irrelevant for most gamers as they will likely to use discrete cards rather than the IGP. Worst still those chips are not intended to compete with APUs due to their pricing. shakehead.gif

I really wish Intel increased the core count of their chips - it's 2015 already and Intel still stubbornly sticks with a dual core on their i3s... shocking.gif

This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Jun 24 2015, 10:06 PM
« Next Oldest · Hardware Clubs / Brand Discussions · Next Newest »
 

5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0465sec    0.41    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 06:47 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.