Wanna be lazy try tipu u also susah

Nah, here's how I treat disposed funds (see attached screenshot)

1. All the historical transactions are still there <- this is an ABSOLUTE MUST!
2. Last "summary" row for the fund, "total units" cell is zero because I've fully switched out
3. No more date, no more amount.
4. XIRR for that fund, covers rows 438 to 446
5. Profit/(loss) for that fund, also covers rows 438 to 446

I kept this fund's transactions totally hidden away from sight, but they're all there, covered by portfolio XIRR calculation and profit/(loss) calculation.

U cannot just keep 1 row with the profit/(loss) from that fund, portfolio XIRR calculation needs each and every transaction details (value + date).

jutamind I've entered the transactions as per FSM's data into my spreadsheet, and both the Purchase Amount-to-Units calculation and Unit-to-Sales Amount calculation seems to be tally with FSM's data.

Here's what I have done:
#1 ATTEMPT: Simple Troubleshooting (only use "BUY" and "SELL") - TALLY!!


Let's take it further, and match-exactly the type-of-transaction as-per FSM data:

#2 ATTEMPT: Advanced Troubleshooting (Match transaction type as per FSM data) - ISSUE WITH TRANSACTION TYPE?
1) Enter ALL purchase into my spreadsheet with t-type as per FSM (buy / switch buy), ensure 0% sales charge, ensure amount invested is negative value (this is easily done by converting the [RM XXXX.XX] into [XXXX.XX * -1]
2) CHECK all the calculated units - ENSURE tally with FSM data (up to two decimal points as per FSM standards) - tallied!
3) Enter ALL sales into my spreadsheet with t-type as per FSM (sell / switch sell / platform fee sell), ensure 0% redemption fee, ensure unit sold is negative value (this is also easily done by converting the [XXXX.XX unit] into [XXXX.XX * -1]
4) CHECK all the calculated Sales Amount - ENSURE tally with FSM sold price (up to two decimal points as per FSM standards) - noticed error, see below
[attachmentid=4316477]

Other than this, I believe there are no rounding issues as all buy/sell have their conversations done correctly as per FSM data (both Purchase to Units; and  Units to Sales Amount)

Or, u could chose to omit transactions from a galaxy far far away...u got Public Mutual transactions too? Or your UTs are all with FSM?

If FSM only, u could just copy and pasta everything from FSM historical transactions listing.

I am happy you asked and I am happy to answer:

CIMB Asia-Pac Dynamic Income Fund aka Ponzi ver 2.0 amongst long time forummers here has the best risk-adjusted return. Hence keep it.

KGF and Small-Cap are essentially invested into the same market and they both have a correlation coefficient of 0.8 which is the numerical/mathematical way of saying you are invested in the same market. 1 is the max value. 

KGF's Corr-coeff vs Ponzi is 0.60 whereas Small cap Corr-coeff with Ponzi 2.0 is 0.54.

To be a logical investor, you need to choose the component of your portfolio to have low Corr-coeff with each other, hence choose small-cap with Ponzi 2.0.

Now you ask me, how I get to have access to all these data?

I told you, I have a crystal ball.

Xuzen