How about JL Audio W3v1 cost RM800 + sealed box?
JL Audio W3v1, W3v2 & W3v3 which one is better?
Which amp match dual voice coils woofer?
|
|
 Oct 9 2006, 08:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
 
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2006, 05:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land
|
Now i got offer from difference shop
JL Audio 12W3V1 with sealed box RM800, JL Audio 12W3V2 with sealed box RM900, JL Audio 12W3V3 with sealed box RM980, Still don't know which one will be my choice...! Because don't the difference mah...  |
|
|
Oct 9 2006, 08:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land
|
QUOTE(mattchin @ Oct 9 2006, 05:17 PM) gif up the v1 since it is so old and long time story liao.. 12W3v2-D4 ur choice will end up @ v2 and v3.. so u figure it out urself larhh.. btw, how low can this v2 and v4s' freq can go down 2?  Free Air Resonance (Fs): 24.0 Hz Electrical "Q" (Qes): 0.443 Mechanical "Q" (Qms): 8.483 Total Speaker "Q" (Qts): 0.421 Equivalent Compliance (Vas): 3.65 cu. ft. / 103.4 liters One-Way, Linear Excursion (Xmax)*: 0.463 in. / 11.8 mm Reference Efficiency (no): 0.310% Efficiency (1W/1m)**: 86.9 dB SPL Effective Piston Area (Sd): 81.5 sq. in. / 0.0526 sq. m. DC Resistance (Re): 7.35 ohm*** Nominal Impedance (Znom): Dual 4 ohm Thermal Power Handling (Pt): 300W Driver Displacement: 0.07 cu. ft. / 1.98 liters Net Weight: 11.2 lbs. / 5.0 kg 12W3v3-4 Free Air Resonance (Fs): 26.72 Hz Electrical "Q" (Qes): 0.472 Mechanical "Q" (Qms): 7.572 Total Speaker "Q" (Qts): 0.444 Equivalent Compliance (Vas): 2.844 cu. ft. / 80.54 liters One-Way, Linear Excursion (Xmax)*: 0.510 in. / 13.0 mm Reference Efficiency (no): 0.313% Efficiency (1W/1m)**: 87.15 dB SPL Effective Piston Area (Sd): 80.600 sq. in. / 0.0520 sq. m. DC Resistance (Re): 3.563 ohm Nominal Impedance (Znom): 4 ohm Thermal Power Handling (Pt): 300W Driver Displacement: 0.071 cu. ft. / 2.01 liters Net Weight: 14.50 lbs. / 6.58 kg Which one better? |
|
|
Oct 9 2006, 10:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land
|
I don't know how to see the spec...
 |
|
|
Oct 10 2006, 07:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land
|
QUOTE(mattchin @ Oct 9 2006, 11:26 PM) v3 is better.. How to say better?haf u tested it urself? btw, the design g00d arhh  ? he! he! Which better consider good? |
|
|
Oct 13 2006, 11:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land
|
QUOTE(howiechoo @ Oct 11 2006, 12:51 AM) v2 go deeper(more vibrate area,more air) while v3 is harder(less vibrate area,less air).......v3 will be more punchy than v2...so it depend on u...if i were u, i will get the v2 for the wiring options and the deep bass.....but if u like harder bass than v2, then u should get v3 since the rated power are 300w for the only 1 voice coil...needless to say it's more powerful for hard punchy bass......(punchy and punchier are compare within this 2 sub only) Like that ar... SQ go for V2, is it ok?as a conclusion from my opinion, v2 is like usa sPL sub which are good in low freq, while v3 is like malaysia spl sub which is good for higher freq... this is wat i understand from my experience and the spec shown....if wanna flame, then........ |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2006, 12:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land
|
QUOTE(mattchin @ Oct 14 2006, 04:41 PM) i blif u can hear a little bit more.. uncle s00ng ? Who? yeah.. it's true.. depends on ur own preference.. don save cost on the box.. uncle s00ng is expert on tat..   |
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 07:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land
|
1 ohm stable amp suitable for 4 ohm DVC ?
or 2 ohm stable amp suitable? |
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 07:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land
|
I saw Sony old model 2 channel amp (Not Xplode) can go to 1 ohm stable...
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 01:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
|
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land
|
QUOTE(howiechoo @ Oct 18 2006, 11:55 AM) he wont intro 1 la...so many ppl wanted to know yet he always find some other things to talk about and keep his stuff secret Yaloh...  None ask me before mah...  |
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 09:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
|
Senior Member
1,105 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Chapalang & Hampalang Land
|
QUOTE(howiechoo @ Oct 18 2006, 07:46 PM) so tell now low....no need to keep it secret....btw i had saw a guy in zth always wanted to know about ur spec....y dun show us? Hehe...Know my spec for what le? Got help them meh? My stuft still under upgrade loh... Today maybe A tomorrow maybe become B... Later stuft not same laio, u all will TL me ...  |
| Change to: |  0.0194sec
 0.31
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:00 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.