misleading information = wrong information.
but then i certainly don't see misleading information even on the reference thread. perhaps a lacking of information, but definitely not misleading.
since you know those information weren't given on the post - the least you could do is to check on those details before handing the money.
perhaps there were things about the PS2 that you had more knowledge about compared to him, yet the problem is you didn't check.
so theoretically - when you handed the money over, you're AGREEING that you accept the current condition of the item.
it's very kind of yetieater to offer a full refund (or most part of the refund) already.
and the part about asking for compensation of travel cost - now that's ridiculous. each one bear his own transportation cost, that's how i look at it. when you BUY something, you're aware that you're taking the risk and the goods may have problems. it's never fair to ask someone to cover your transportation cost.
QUOTE(duke_hunt @ Sep 23 2006, 01:43 AM)
to settle this issue.....
- yeti, not wanting to pay the rm 30 right...go to his place, refund the money, leave his place, never sell ur ps2 over lyn again by meaning, keep it or sell it to ur friend,chastise must not claim rm30 from u....
- chastise, go back to yeti's place, give back the ps2, take back ur rm 390 + rm 25 for the new controller and thats it, not rm 30 coz its ur fault at first by not testing it at yeti's house and by only relying on seller's trust....
i like this one. the bolded one that is.
IMO it's about 2 people not willing to give/take when it comes to such situation.
This post has been edited by goldfries: Sep 23 2006, 10:59 AM