20 secs is reasonable.
I believe the admins came to this figure after monitoring the DB load.
flood control is to strict, 5s is enough
|
|
 Sep 22 2006, 04:40 AM
|
 
Senior Member
1,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL 
|
|
Quote|
|
Sep 22 2006, 06:12 AM
|
 
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003   
|
QUOTE(wKkaY @ Sep 21 2006, 10:21 PM) Hang on guys, I think he's talking about the search function. yup!! that's why we need flood control even more...... especially for search, cos search takes up more resources than posting.  QUOTE(se7en @ Sep 21 2006, 10:30 PM) flood control only applies to posting a new post/reply, it doesn't affect reading. i would be suprised if you are able to post something, jump to another thread and read through it and post again within 20 seconds. Unless you're spamming the forums with unwanted posts OR you're replying to your own replies in the forums. that's the wonder of tab browsing.And IF this is in relation to the search feature, then no, there will be a 20 second delay in between searches to avoid abuse of the search function. QUOTE(driftmeister @ Sep 21 2006, 10:53 PM) when search no result the thing is, just because there's no results that doesn't mean no search was done. then there will be no flood control QUOTE(FUZI0N @ Sep 21 2006, 10:40 PM) he meant the flood control for searching isn't it? now again do consider the # of spammers we have on LYN. the time delay for posting / search is to provide the rest of you faster load time from LYN server - that's good, no?i also kinda agree that the time is kinda too long 5-10secs will be better |
| Change to: |  0.0129sec
 0.63
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 01:01 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.