AMD K8 Family Overclocking (754/939/940/AM2/1207), General discussions and newbies' guide
|
|
 Jan 28 2006, 11:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003  
|
QUOTE(nairud @ Jan 26 2006, 09:08 AM) Guys....sigh. looks like i've maxed out at 243HTT. Tried to go 244 HTT tak boleh already (Bootup process hang). Running at 5:4. any ideas? hang in which part? black & white post screen or during loading windows? try to tune the max async latency and read preamble, see how is it going to happen.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2006, 11:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
how do I know that my proc overclock performance is limited due to memory controller?
|
|
|
Mar 12 2006, 02:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Westley @ Mar 12 2006, 01:08 PM) any1 think 0516 FPAW great? no people will know unless you give a try  |
|
|
Dec 13 2006, 08:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
2876MHz @ 1.5v is kinda impressive.
but do it prime stable? anyway, try to push your old school BH5s to its limit. |
|
|
Mar 31 2007, 06:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Just got X2 3800+ s939, the 2nd core is higher than 1st core about 10'c during prime...is it normal?
|
|
|
Apr 1 2007, 09:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Apr 1 2007, 08:56 PM) 10'c is abit wierd bro, mine d most is 5'c. steppin? forgot to note it down and lazy to take off the hsf to check   2.5GHz prime failed even @ 1.5v may due the 2nd core temp quite high 59-60'c compare to the 1st core which 49-50'c  |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 2 2007, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Apr 1 2007, 10:24 PM) improper contact of d ihs i guess, time to rip it off... e4, same as yours. e6 i guess? dont think so as the temp for the core 1 is normal. |
|
|
Apr 2 2007, 10:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Apr 2 2007, 08:11 AM) i think yas is older batch. newer batch of e4 (especially those 06xx) tend to be better clocker. neway, i'm runnun mine @ 2.4GHz only it's more than enuf for me, time for 2GB bro... if not mistaken, mine is 06xx batch... p/s: wat if u just stress d core w/ lower temp? will d hotter core effected?  tested on 240x10 idle core 0 (36'c) & core 1 (40'c) prime core 0 core 0 (41'c) & core 1 (41-42'c) prime core 1 core 0 (43'c) & core 1 (52-53'c) |
|
|
May 6 2007, 12:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(avengers88 @ May 5 2007, 08:58 PM) ohh .. s939 only got manchester core is it . but windsor is more cooler than manchester hehe .. mine is AM2 .. patut la .. i also manchester fan le T.T !  |
|
|
Jun 20 2007, 09:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(uzairi @ Jun 20 2007, 09:20 PM) Yup, they are among the hottest x2. Dual core opty is using Toledo too IINM, not sure about it. ya, dual core opteron is based toledo core but with 1MB L2 cache. |
|
|
Aug 8 2007, 12:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(sniper69 @ Aug 8 2007, 09:46 AM)  , just got myself a AMD Athlon64 FX-60 (Toledo), back at home... tried to overclock to hit 3.0GHz barrier, but seems i can't get pass from that, hit the 3.0GHz (200MHz (stock FSB) x 15), it'll reboot again...    |
|
|
Aug 9 2007, 10:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(sniper69 @ Aug 9 2007, 07:47 AM) adala...  , well startup vCORE is 1.350, with maximum recommended 1.400, the thing is, i'm not willing to risk my new processor get fried just because of too much vCORE applied, is it 1.500vCORE too much   |
| Change to: |  0.0318sec
 0.24
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:51 PM |
Quote