Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
AMD K8 Family Overclocking (754/939/940/AM2/1207), General discussions and newbies' guide
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 12:15 AM
|
|
just brought amd 3200 winchester abit fatal1ty an8 6 moth ago
i want to try to overclock this processor but lack of knowledge already made some studied but hard to understand how to oc... this processor compare to intel previously used
can some one help me with this for those who are experience with it
This post has been edited by emilz: Jan 12 2006, 12:22 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 12:31 AM
|
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ Jan 12 2006, 12:22 AM) which part don't you understand exactly?  seems to be all lahh i oc already but when i force to 230 hz the system keep on restarting n i also need to know how to control the ram timing since it way to many compare to intel
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 12:38 AM
|
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ Jan 12 2006, 12:35 AM) when you raise your HTT.. you need to set your LDT multiplier to x4 or x3 appropriately according to your HTT.. HTT x LDT multiplier can't exceed 1000.. well it can.. but there's a limit on how far you can go past 1000.. the best way is to keep it under 1000.. as for ram timings.. it depends on which ram you are using.. was it the mutiplier factor how about the voltage i only set to 1.45 ~ 1.5 currently using corsair value buy only anything need to kacau
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 12:59 AM
|
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ Jan 12 2006, 12:49 AM) there's 2 multiplier.. CPU multiplier which is 200 x "10" for your particular CPU and LDT which is 200 x "5" = 1000 for every athlon64 system i can't remember what it's called in abit's bios.. but there should be one stating something like 1x 2x 3x 4x 5x or 200 400 600 800 1000 as for your ram.. run it at a divider.. in your dram configuration page.. set it to run at DDR333 / 166 to eliminate your ram as the factor that's holding back your CPU.. don't bump your voltage unless u can't go any higher sorry to say i cannot find the LTD i dont know where it located i only found the current one which is to set the fsb and multiplier wah still hang oooo
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 01:08 AM
|
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ Jan 12 2006, 01:02 AM) there's definitely one there find one that gives u only 5 options 1x 2x 3x 4x 5x or 200 400 600 800 1000 if you don't set it to x4 don't expet it to go higher than ~ 220 ok found it it called HT Frequency inside the ram timing no wonder it was to hard to search the normal condition for it was set to auto wash it higher better or lower better ot set the LDT
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 01:29 AM
|
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ Jan 12 2006, 01:12 AM) there's actually no gain if you go past 1000 just keep it below 1000 and it'll be fine up to 250 set x4 past 250 set to x3 and so on tq for this information
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 01:36 AM
|
|
was it necessary to set the fsb multiplier to 8.5 or lower dont oc already so far ok with the oc ability how about to stress my processor and ram ability since i using good cooler
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 01:44 AM
|
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ Jan 12 2006, 01:42 AM) don't use a .5 multiplier for your CPU .. it manipulates your ram to give you that clock.. if you use .5 your ram will be clocked lower.. use a divider.. run until u hit a wall then raise your voltage.. then keep going.. hit a wall then raise voltage.. and so on.. it's safe to go until about 1.6 i guess if the temps are below 55 test one by one.. don't try to overclock both together.. u'll end up wasting more time.. hmmm like what i try to oc the processor to up to 235 and the multiplier for the fsb was 9.0 and the ldt set to 2.5 then suddently the mobo clear it own cmos why?????
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 01:46 AM
|
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ Jan 12 2006, 01:42 AM) it's safe to go until about 1.6 i guess if the temps are below 55 the temp when oc to 230 was only 34 ~ 35 degree only This post has been edited by emilz: Jan 12 2006, 01:50 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 01:56 AM
|
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ Jan 12 2006, 01:52 AM) did you set your ram to run at DDR333 / 166 divider? for abit the temps usually is about 5-8c lower.. so add about 5-8 back to the reading and it should be right that means every time want to oc the processor the ram oso need to set larrr is that how it work what was this sse3 since my proc dont have the function of it
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 02:05 AM
|
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ Jan 12 2006, 02:00 AM) if you don't set your ram will run async to your HTT.. and if you ram can't take it your system won't take it as a whole.. running a divider makes sure that you are not RAM limited when overclocking your CPU.. sse3 is a set of instructions used in programs.. i think it was first used on intel CPUs.. and now it's on Athlon64 as well.. i think winchesters are the first one to have? (correct me if i'm wrong) i'm not familiar with SSE3.. maybe someone else can enlighten you on it  nope my winchester dont have this sse3 i cannot show because i dont know how to paste inside this forum u know how ka????
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 02:08 AM
|
|
this is the pic[attachmentid=86645][attachmentid=86646]
This post has been edited by emilz: Jan 12 2006, 02:15 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 05:29 PM
|
|
any information
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 05:48 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Jan 12 2006, 05:37 PM) winchester core...old core...does not oc as good as the current batch of venice processors...should be able to hit bout 2.7ghz on this processor at max...btw, dun create a thread la...post it in other threads..you really want mod to close this thread duntcha?  that means i got the old processor laa sial la tuu bought just 6 month ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 05:57 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Jan 12 2006, 05:51 PM) hehe...new processors are all codenamed "venice" with revision of either E3, E4 or E6..hehehe..sorry dude...gotta read up before buying ma..  anyway, its still good that you got yourself AMD instead of intel...  ya loo but i fell the different between my 3200 and my friend 3000 venice instead of overcloking, and in normal condition mine was lake a bit
|
|
|
|
|
|
emilz
|
Jan 12 2006, 06:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Jan 12 2006, 06:04 PM) nah...that is wat you feel...actually its based on lots of factors...the mobo, ram and hard disk that both of you uses will yield slightly different performance...overall, your processor should be as good as the venice, the only drawback is that your Vcore runs slightly higher at stock as compared to venice....1.45v as compared to 1.4v....although at stock speeds, both does not have major difference in heat..but once OC, you'll know wat i meant..hehehe... oh..another difference would be that venice supports SSE3 instructions whereas your processor doesn't.... compare to ram mine more better 160 sata 2 1g corsair ram he oso used abit but not fatality 512 ram kingston
|
|
|
|
|