nice boss!

Looking at the block paultan site thread...

I see many cant accept the truth that Ron97 no obvious advantage on "Normal" car.. Lolz

Jom wed97

Both my mavi and lala still full with sat95..

btw, how about motion sensor? Can find ah?

Got also.

Dual zone motion sensor. Sensitivity can be adjust summore..
can be integrated to our etacs.

dual zone means.. External says u 1m away can sense u.. Give warning.. (do not kacau!) .. Second zone is inside the car d.. (eh arsehole.. Leave my car alone!)

i worry too sensitive only. The motion sensor use RF signals, somewhat like a radar.

So if we lock the car but forgot to close window,alarm will trigger?
iirc,ford ranger use cobra system got this function..

I dun think so.
It detects movement

the extra payment need to be justified ma

ppl can afford ron97 and cannot accept the fact that they pay extra for nothing ma...
butthurt...

Got one so high can accept the truth that he show dyno machine and the factory test engine faciltiy. They say swap driver too many variable..

But my own opinion (not supporting paultan). The test was exactly what the real life senario would be..

NA ron95 vs NA ron97
TSI ron95 vs TSI ron97

Further more same condition.. Weather, temperature, road usage, jam or not.. Yes fella A might be more heavy footed than fella B.. Thats why they swap! So it will average out. The key factor is the same car remain Ron95 or Ron97.

but the end result does not favour the 97 user of coz

ppl take stuffs too seriously to an extreme extent...to me just test it on own car with own driving style and usual driving route. then pump own preferred petrol. thats all.

anyway, good stuff you've done there regarding the tilt and shock sensor!

Self test less accurate as thw environment not controlled.
U cant have the same jam everytime
U cant have the same temperature

Can chase the stupid cats from climbing my car also? The external sensor thing.

Maybe put woof woof sound or something.

very true...just get an average. cannot be accurate also. but i do get quite average result. like you say, cannot judge based on just a few pump.

so many variable need to be considered....

like i mentioned previously even i never pump 97 i also never got a consistent FC......

hardly can compare

For cheapskate like me.. Very simple ..
Rm2 vs rm1.70...

15% diff.

if u cant get a consistant 15% means its crap

For me. I know how the ecu works.. How the mechanical works.. I dun waste my money (not for inspira)

i got people claim he has 30% difference
power even better
can vroom vroom

Baca


Attached thumbnail(s)

just curious, if you MAX out the ignition timing, what Octane/RON rating is required?

ya worrisome especially in Malaysian itchy hand environment.

"har?! do not kacau?!" *takes 20cent coin/baseball bat*

habis lol.

tipu la.
i straight away kena label jilat PT for going against /k/