Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 12 files of 3GB compress become 700MB, Highly compressed without losing quality

views
     
1024kbps
post Nov 18 2014, 09:57 PM

李素裳
*******
Senior Member
6,009 posts

Joined: Feb 2007



QUOTE(Hikari Natsumi @ Nov 18 2014, 09:41 PM)
Is that him? I don't believe he join this forum too...

I used a lot GPU based encoder, quality super bad!

Found this...
user posted image

I test on my AMD PhenomII X6 3GHz vs Core i5 480M... Intel win, I notice that Encoding speed is count on CPU Instruction Set, not more core mean more speed.
*
Just look at his sig, it's the same person i think.

It's true that more instruction set the better, but x264 encoding speed is somehow depends at the compile times.
Like what compiler used, or what library included during compiling h264 source.

ICL(Intel C Compiler) compiled x264 encoder usually are optimized for Intel CPU thus have dramatical difference.
And it's much faster compare to GCC compiled x264.

Yeah GPU assisted encoder are faster because they're more simpler, but x264 can beat most of them even with the default quality settings.

This post has been edited by 1024kbps: Nov 18 2014, 09:59 PM
TSHikari Natsumi
post Nov 18 2014, 10:22 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
24 posts

Joined: Nov 2014
From: \Device\Harddisk0\Partiton1\


QUOTE(1024kbps @ Nov 18 2014, 09:57 PM)
Just look at his sig, it's the same person i think.

It's true that more instruction set the better, but x264 encoding speed is somehow depends at the compile times.
Like what compiler used, or what library included during compiling h264 source.

ICL(Intel C Compiler) compiled x264 encoder usually are optimized for Intel CPU thus have dramatical difference.
And it's much faster compare to GCC compiled x264.

Yeah GPU assisted encoder are faster because they're more simpler, but x264 can beat most of them even with the default quality settings.
*
Oh! going to PM him...

Well... I look that Intel C Compiler is not free on Windows, but free on linux,
I see that IFME using GCC, I think fair for both brand CPU.

I found that IFME works on Linux, found on fb page.
user posted image

I didn't see Mac version.

then... Opus audio codec? This something new.
Anime4000
post Nov 19 2014, 10:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,399 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: /dev/null


QUOTE(1024kbps @ Nov 18 2014, 09:57 PM)
Just look at his sig, it's the same person i think.
*
Yep, that's me, Hikari just PM me because this encoder help save disk space = =
yet "IFME" project still in beta, also never finish smile.gif

Here my GitHub, IFME source code, so who to like cracking/decompile will become invalid =P
https://github.com/Anime4000/IFME

please look project website:
http://ifme.sourceforge.net/

There are some people donate some his/her $ to support, yep, I will work my best to make it better!
TSHikari Natsumi
post Nov 19 2014, 10:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
24 posts

Joined: Nov 2014
From: \Device\Harddisk0\Partiton1\


Man... you just make awesome program, with update-able plugins on program launch, I didn't see any video converter have this feature, even paid version!

you make it open source! make people trust that IFME has no backdoor or even viruses!

This program just help my raw footage save in latest codec with smaller size! I need better CPU to make it faster... sad.gif

This post has been edited by Hikari Natsumi: Nov 19 2014, 10:58 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0132sec    0.26    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 04:13 AM