QUOTE(Hikari Natsumi @ Nov 18 2014, 09:41 PM)
Is that him? I don't believe he join this forum too...
I used a lot GPU based encoder, quality super bad!
Found this...

I test on my AMD PhenomII X6 3GHz vs Core i5 480M... Intel win, I notice that Encoding speed is count on CPU Instruction Set, not more core mean more speed.
Just look at his sig, it's the same person i think.I used a lot GPU based encoder, quality super bad!
Found this...

I test on my AMD PhenomII X6 3GHz vs Core i5 480M... Intel win, I notice that Encoding speed is count on CPU Instruction Set, not more core mean more speed.
It's true that more instruction set the better, but x264 encoding speed is somehow depends at the compile times.
Like what compiler used, or what library included during compiling h264 source.
ICL(Intel C Compiler) compiled x264 encoder usually are optimized for Intel CPU thus have dramatical difference.
And it's much faster compare to GCC compiled x264.
Yeah GPU assisted encoder are faster because they're more simpler, but x264 can beat most of them even with the default quality settings.
This post has been edited by 1024kbps: Nov 18 2014, 09:59 PM
Nov 18 2014, 09:57 PM

Quote
0.0137sec
0.42
5 queries
GZIP Disabled