Seems like currently it's under Master title, but they're in progress to split it to individual.
so, the flow should be:

1) Developer to provide consent of transfer to land office
2) land office to provide state consent
3) then we could only proceed Consent to charge  (for bank to release the money)

Right? please correct me if i'm wrong.. 

big thanks..

Me and the seller engaged different lawyer, it's not recommended by the agent.
Looks like this is the best way so that I could sort out all the problems and get the house.
it's just frustrating and feel helpless where my lawyer and agent giving different answer when I queried.

How you get the contact of the seller?

Agency: The One Property International

Thanks.

[email=takeshi_79]takeshi_79[/email] this. I suspect the title is still under master title, this is something you need to verify with the current owner.

Chances are, this is the one currently delaying the process. Don't believe everything your agent says. At this stage, it's best to deal directly with the owner and their lawyer.

I went thru a lot of frustration having to deal with the agent as the middle-man for the first 6 months, until I got fed up and decided to deal direct with the owner. Only then did I realize a lot of miscomm was given by the agent to both parties.

Which agency/lawyer are you going with? are they experienced or recommended by your agents?

It's common for this to happen especially when it's involved with leasehold prop, heck my freehold property in BJ also needs longer than that to get the consent. Even though the title states freehold but still need state approval.

I'm assuming you are using different lawyers? That should mean approx 1-2 months wasted for your lawyer to ding dong with the other lawyer. Btw, has the developer released the title to your previous owners?

Best is to get your current lawyer to arrange a meeting with their lawyer with both party present and thrash out the details.

freehold need consent?i dont think so,kene scam?

Unfortunelty, Seremban area, Cyberjaya area, metaprolitan kl and bukit jalil area, a lot of freehold land have restriction of transfer. Because it's previously leasehold land transfer to freehold that why needed consent for transfer.

as i know once transfer to freehold should be no more consent...freehold means 999 years u have the authority to own the land...what for need the consent just for transfering the ownership?if transfer to different title thats make sense abit but transfer ownship why still need it..

Consent if a tools to control transfer ownership included limited foreigners purchaser, bumi lot quota protection, etc etc. So even transfer to freehold the consent still maintain must have their reasons.