state consent for transfer of LH property is it? that one is MB office sign off, not land office, betul tak?

Yes, it's lease hold, non-bumi lot.

According to my lawyer, they're chasing the seller lawyer. seems like it's seller lawyer to deal with developer and land office.

is that correct?

Yes, it's lease hold, non-bumi lot.

According to my lawyer, they're chasing the seller lawyer. seems like it's seller lawyer to deal with developer and land office.

is that correct?

It's common for this to happen especially when it's involved with leasehold prop, heck my freehold property in BJ also needs longer than that to get the consent. Even though the title states freehold but still need state approval.

I'm assuming you are using different lawyers? That should mean approx 1-2 months wasted for your lawyer to ding dong with the other lawyer. Btw, has the developer released the title to your previous owners?

Best is to get your current lawyer to arrange a meeting with their lawyer with both party present and thrash out the details.

MB office? can explain in details about the standard flow.
 

We're using different lawyer.

How may types of consent involved in this process?

1) Consent of Transfer
2) Consent to Charge
3) State consent (no idea what is this?)
4) CTC Blanket consent

According to my agent, seller lawyer directly went to land office to follow up the state consent
to be approved. is that possible?
I'm just worried the agent giving me wrong information and trying to play around..

 

This LH property, has it already obtained strata title.? If not yet, lagi headache. state consent at LO is for state to grant consent to transfer since technically 99 year LH development is leased from the state, not owned in perpetuity. I believe the (1) consent to transfer is at the developer side, if the strata title is not issued yet.  ie. the development is still under master title.
it may not be agent playing aroudn, sometime agen not enough experience.

This LH property, has it already obtained strata title.? If not yet, lagi headache. state consent at LO is for state to grant consent to transfer since technically 99 year LH development is leased from the state, not owned in perpetuity. I believe the (1) consent to transfer is at the developer side, if the strata title is not issued yet.  ie. the development is still under master title.
it may not be agent playing aroudn, sometime agen not enough experience.

Yes, it's lease hold, non-bumi lot.

According to my lawyer, they're chasing the seller lawyer. seems like it's seller lawyer to deal with developer and land office.

is that correct?

Seems like currently it's under Master title, but they're in progress to split it to individual.
so, the flow should be:

1) Developer to provide consent of transfer to land office
2) land office to provide state consent
3) then we could only proceed Consent to charge  (for bank to release the money)

Right? please correct me if i'm wrong.. 

big thanks..

[email=takeshi_79]takeshi_79[/email] this. I suspect the title is still under master title, this is something you need to verify with the current owner.

Chances are, this is the one currently delaying the process. Don't believe everything your agent says. At this stage, it's best to deal directly with the owner and their lawyer.

I went thru a lot of frustration having to deal with the agent as the middle-man for the first 6 months, until I got fed up and decided to deal direct with the owner. Only then did I realize a lot of miscomm was given by the agent to both parties.

Which agency/lawyer are you going with? are they experienced or recommended by your agents?

If the property is in the process of splitting into strata title, the whole process will need to go thru a double transfer.
Which means;
1. Developer to transfer to current owner
2. Current owner transfer to you
Duration of these matters are lengthy. (some cases up to about 1.5 years)