QUOTE(javy0526 @ May 4 2016, 02:06 PM)
Hi. May i know what is the different between GL and FL?
GL... cheapest/lowest end CX-5FL... newest face-lift model...
so you can get a FL with a GL spec....
Mazda CX5 Owners Club, Let's share ur CX5 Experience
|
|
 May 5 2016, 05:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon  
|
FL... newest face-lift model... so you can get a FL with a GL spec.... |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
May 5 2016, 05:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon
|
Query: For CX-5 without i-stop tech.... could it use regular wet-cell batteries?... instead of the costly deep cycle ones.....
|
|
|
Jun 9 2016, 07:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon
|
QUOTE(toshio14 @ Jun 7 2016, 11:46 AM) i've been reading about CX-5 in here quite a bit, and found out that the battery is quite pricey due to the usage nature of the Skyactive technology To be specific... the i-stop tech needs a deep cycle battery...... hence more expensive...is this still a thing? as the one i read forumer posted in this forum was from last year if yes, how much does it cost for battery replacement? and how frequent we generally need to replace the battery? However last year's model, (probably still available in some showrooms) without i-stop tech can utilise normal lead-acid batteries... |
|
|
Jun 9 2016, 12:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon
|
QUOTE(chuah_ph @ Jun 9 2016, 08:40 AM) Just wondering, how was the 2.5L 2WD FC if come w/ 19" Rims? Unless you own both cars ... you cannot really make a valid comparison... but generally 2.5 will use (slightly) more fuel, though one benefit of 2.5L 2WD.... low end torque, max at 3k rpm.Not much ppls talk about 2.5L 2WD FC here in this thread, SA told me not much different from 2.0L 2WD but would like to know from the actual user feedbacks. Thx |
|
|
Jun 9 2016, 02:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon
|
QUOTE(chuah_ph @ Jun 9 2016, 02:22 PM) Expected more but as long as reasonable then acceptable ahha....heard can get 500km++ which consider best for 2.5L car.... Still running the first tank full... note both the 2.0 & 2.5L has the 56L tank. |
|
|
Jun 10 2016, 05:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon
|
QUOTE(chuah_ph @ Jun 9 2016, 09:09 PM) Urs is 2.0L? 2.5L |
|
|
Jun 10 2016, 05:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon
|
QUOTE(bimmer @ Jun 9 2016, 11:41 PM) The 2.5L has a 58L tank, according to the official brochure. Minor difference. 2WD has the 56L..... 4WD has 58 |
|
|
Jun 10 2016, 08:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon
|
QUOTE(chuah_ph @ Jun 10 2016, 07:12 AM) Urs is 2.5L 2WD with 19" Rims rite? free first tank....which I believe is RON95If yes then urs the latest config haha wanna wait for ur 1st tank FC hehhe RON95? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.1103sec
 0.80
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 09:51 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.