Kikiki. Rokok sudah difatwakan haram tapi ramai yang masih hisap.
Mungkin perlu sijil haram dan makruh juga. Kikiki.

yg saya faham
the principle/original ruling of any kinds of food and drink is halal, until you find something that makes it haram
based on this understanding of mine, the halal certification is meant to be an assurance effort, i.e. to provide peace of mind that something is indeed haram.
so basically, in the extreme example, you were "originally" allowed to eat pigs - until came the warning/prohibition. the same case is true and well recorded for booze/beer/wine and the lots. originally, they were allowed to drink (as long as they were not getting ready to pray - iirc), then came the prohibition where it became "absolutely harooom.jpg"
the same principle applies to other things, which are not part of our ibadah.
if there were no prohibitions (some more examples, which may be extreme):
- you would have been allowed to interract freely with the opposite sex
- you would have been allowed to kill people
- you would have been allowed to steal from other people
- you would have been allowed to take interest from loans
on the other hand, there are no prohibitions to trade, so the original ruling that it is halal still stands. likewise for farming, traveling, site-seeing, etc.
Islam puts the barriers of haram in place. and you can turn haram things that were halal - I mean, if it were haram from the start then you can't make it haram again right?

depends on people...

utk makanan, mmg org akan tgk for halal certification heck tapi still org islam pegi masuk chili's and TGI friday eventho demo xde sijil halal,

saja nak share exp, pernah stay UK for 2y la..cari makanan mmg susah, so aku tgk makanan vegetarian and avoid food yg E471

dari segi barang....barang apa yg kau maksudkan nak kene ade sijil halal??LEL

AHAHA..i get it now

back then masa kat UK, local shop ade jual ubat gigi mukmin..syukurr ade ubat gigi malaysia kat sana...

they dont need, but they can still applied eg: kena fitnah like colgate

I dont know if this is OK or not

Hence I say here. Instead of normal thread. At kopitiam

Today khutbah. Made me really uncomfortable

Because there's one part. The khatib (I assume without referring to any text)

Said few sahabat confirm masuk syurga cuz they drink peluh and darah nabi

I understand his point was to say. We need to love the prophet

But deep down. I can't make myself agree with that

I believe in Islam. I choose Islam. Primarily because it rewards us for who we are

The good deed that we do. That's how we get to go to heaven

Not by drinking blood or sweat

I haven't checked the validity of said hadith. But either way I can't bring myself to agree to what he said

I think today got rouge ustad
No refer to text

Mostly about sayang nabi

Then he said. Got 2 story. Before end the khutbah

Hence the story I just told

Yes

But the extra info. That Nabi actually not prefer/don't like that to happen

Does ease my restlessness

Like u said. There's more to the story

But the khatib cut short

Thanks bro

pergi stalk keristiyen feloship then 

I did lol

Occasionally

tariq jamel? sound familiar... what he do eh?

Fuhhh kalo gitu bila pi iran kena hati hati la kot. Sebab sana da syiah sume.
Tp aku ada dengar dulu sesiapa yang sembelih atas nama Allah maka dihalalkan sembelihan nya. Macam geng syiah ne dia pun sembah Allah jugak kan.

btw guys,
apa pendapat 1.ucap, 2.sambut, 3.secret santa pada hari natal? harom ke halol?

ada sos? ada 3 soalan aku letak tuh

1. aku macam pernah dengar harus
2. rasa macam harom (pendapat sendiri)
3. ni yang aku betul2 tak tahu

Hukum mengucapkan Merry Christmas adalah HARUS dan perlu meraikan garis panduan yang telah kami nyatakan. Ini juga selari dengan keputusan Muzakarah Jawatankuasa Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan Bagi Hal Ehwal Ugama Islam Malaysia Kali Ke-78 yang bersidang pada 12 Jun 2007, “Memberi ucapan tahniah dan selamat atau mengirimkan ucapan melalui kad atau alat-alat telekomunikasi seperti e-mel atau sistem pesanan ringkas (SMS) dan sebagainya kepada orang bukan Muslim sempena dengan perayaan agama mereka adalah harus, dengan syarat ucapan itu tidak mengiktiraf, memuji atau memuliakan agama bukan Muslim serta tidak menggunakan sebarang simbol atau lambang keagamaan mereka dalam kiriman ucapan tersebut.”

btw, KWSP/EPF kene bayar zakat? aku google kena tapi tak sure bayar setiap tahun atau bayar bila keluar?

ok dah jumpa sos kata bayar bila keluar http://blog.zakatselangor.com.my/simpanan-...kat-atau-tidak/
sebab time dalam EPF belum sempurna milik kita

jangan tanya orang pasal amalan dia

nanti kita buka aib orang

itu antara dia dengan Allah

kalau dah bayar ansuran, means bila deposit semua EPF nanti takyah bayar langsung? btw, ayam duduk selangor liao, ikut selangor fatwa

for me, i don't pay zakat pendapatan - if you guys are talking about the monthly payment type
my basis is that would be like "double taxation"
i pay RM## every month, then every one year  I pay RM ### - calculation which includes money from the balance of my salary (of course, the full calculation includes my savings and all other whatever la). so i just pay once a year.
on a more religious stand point, i follow the ruling that there is no such thing as zakat pendapatan (monthly payment type). there is only zakat maal (zakat harta), calculated and paid on an annual basis.
the common and logical argument that supports this is that in the old days of the Prophet (PBUH) and sahabat, there are already people who work and earn salary. it was never known that these people pay zakat on a monthly basis.

one can, of course, argue that the monthly payment is like dividing your yearly zakat by 12. fine, la. but i just think it's premature to pay when really, you need to ensure that your harta meets the criteria of having a full year (hijri year) completed where the amount exceeds the minimum threshold (equiv to 85 g of gold, iirc). full year means the amount never drops below 85 g of gold. if it drops, the counter should reset upon the time the amount recovers. it's also like trying to stay ahead of fate (takdir), as if you already know what will happen (i.e. that you will meet the full year and amount criteria). who knows, we might die the next day and therefore we are liberated from the obligation to pay zakat, since we did not complete the full year cycle.

but that's just me and what ruling i hold on to. not trying to force it upon anyone.

I mean, the key prerequisites of zakat is it meets a full year while being over the threshold.
So if you pay monthly, it must mean that by the end of 12 months, your wealth will always be over the minimum threshold. But the thing is, we never know how long we will live. It may be that we die just one day before a full year had been completed. Or that during the fourth month we are forced to spend so much money that our wealth drops below the required level. That's why I don't prefer this method.
Unfortunately I don't know enough to say what happens if one already paid several months then suddenly one has to empty out one's coffers. For sure the timer resets to zero. But what of the amounts already paid? Your intent was zakat. And we know for sure that "segala amal itu bergantung pada niat nya"
That's also why I don't pay monthly. I not that smart laa.

tapi masjid as-salam dekat puchong rilek aje 

literally dalam masjid = ??
dalam kawasan tetapi diluar masjid (eg: parking dalam) = ??
luar bersebelahan masjid (eg: parking luar) = ??

ada yang kata bidaah - sesuatu yang tak ada diamalkan ketika zaman Nabi..

ada yang kata dibolehkan - atas hujah hujah masing masing..

tapi personally aku dah start distancing from majlis tahlil, atas alasan takut takut termakan duit harta anak yatim kalau kalau diorang guna duit warisan si mati untuk adakan majlis..