in case si mati masih ada anak anak kecik..kan duit dan harta yang ditinggalkan tu untuk anak anak dia..

takut duit tu yang digunakan untuk bagi makan kat orang, buat kenduri..

bro, nk tanye, lau download cite pirate bleh ke?

ambil tu caner?

tapi lau aq download secara tak sengaja?

oo.. leh lak tak logic an. tak pe ar. aq copy kawan aq nyer la, dia bagi.

sekian.

Ooo, mcm yg orang dolu2 dalam cerita guna untuk salin baju tu ek.
Kalau mcm tu mungkin kena tanya kedai perabot atau kedai kayu la.
Yg ni link untuk amazon, boleh cuba cari yg dekat tempat lain punya la :
https://www.amazon.com/Panel-Screens-Partit...1%5Cc4246300011

Imam Ibnul Mundzir mengatakan,

وَأَجْمَعَ كُلُّ مَنْ نَحْفَظُ عَنْهُ مَنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ , عَلَى أَنَّ عَلَى الْمَرْءِ نَفَقَةَ أَوْلادِهِ الأَطْفَالِ الَّذِينَ لا مَالَ لَهُمْ . وَلأَنَّ وَلَدَ الإِنْسَانِ بَعْضُهُ , وَهُوَ بَعْضُ وَالِدِهِ , فَكَمَا يَجِبُ عَلَيْهِ أَنْ يُنْفِقَ عَلَى نَفْسِهِ وَأَهْلِهِ كَذَلِكَ عَلَى بَعْضِهِ وَأَصْلِه

Ulama yang kami ketahui sepakat bahwa seorang lelaki wajib menanggung nafkah anak-anaknya yang masih kecil, yang tidak memiliki harta. Karena anak seseorang adalah darah dagingnya, dia bagian dari orang tuanya. Sebagaimana dia berkewajiban memberi nafkah untuk dirinya dan keluarganya, dia juga berkewajiban memberi nafkah untuk darah dagingnya. (al-Mughni, 8/171).
Read more https://konsultasisyariah.com/22041-meminta...h-bercerai.html
summary of quoted article:

our children remains our flesh and blood, even after divorce with their mother. this flesh and blood connection is not something that can be cut by divorce. based on this principle, the father is still liable to provide for the children even after divorce, where ever the children may be. he is not, however, responsible for the well being of the ex-wife after their divorce.

yes... that is the crux of my summary. although, of course, once the kids become independent (have own source of income, bla bla bla), then there is no more obligation/mandatory nafkah. if you still give, then it is good. if no give, then it is ok (takde dosa punya wan).

but i may have misunderstood... we're talking about the person's (let's call him Mr. A) child(ren), being taken care of by the ex-wife... right?

if we are talking about the child of the widow who came to live with Mr. A (because Mr. A married the widow), then there is no obligation placed by Islam for Mr. A to provide for this child. If he does, then that is good, of course. But if he doesn't provide, then there is no harm in the eye of Islam - maybe only in the eye of society.

Mr. A cannot simply reject the child, though. The right to bring up a child lies first and foremost with the mother (in case of divorce). Exceptions may apply though, such as if the mother became a non-believer, became gravely ill, etc.

Old enough. Dah dekat nak dapat menantu... 

hmm, guys US attack syrian because sarin gas

what your opinion?

as for me, as much as i hate assad but he and russia is the one who liberate from isis and bring back stability from rebel (yea, pro-gov)

Assad and his cronies are the reason why ISIS successfully entered Syria in the first place.

I just hope the war ends soon with Assad cronies replaced by a better government.

There are 2 sides of every coin and as for me, both can't be totally believable.

Salam Aidilfitri guys, may this eid celebrated with joy and penuh syukur. Stay safe wherever you are.

Salam hari raya fellow muslim!

Nak cerita sikit masa balik kampung hari tu, belek2 buku Syarah Al Hikam abang aku. Tapi bab 1 pun dah sangkut, dah goyang. Patut ke aku cari guru atau sekadar tanya sini untuk pemahaman lanjut?

Boleh rekemen ustaz or guru2 mursyid utk aku rujuk? or just tanya je imam2 kat masjid or surau pun boleh?

Insap la sangat seiferal tapi makin kuat pulak kuda kat /k. Adoiiii. Takpe tahun depan raya, leh insap lagi.

Well, I do think it is 27x better compared to doing solat alone, instead of 1 solat = 1 pahala (alone) / 27 (jamaah).

He do jamaah at home, he still get the benefit of 27x, but he does misses the benefit of each step going to masjid/surau to perform the solat jamaah and the benefit of following in the sunnah of Rasulullah S.A.W.

I heard about that hadeeth too, but Rasulullah S.A.W. (and probably also the Khulafa' ar-Rasyidin) never burnt anybody's house that didn't do solat jamaah, so it's more towards telling how important it is doing solat jamaah rather than an actual threat.

If my post contains wrong information, do correct me. Thanks.

Amazing debate.....

Debate of the year. Both side are already really salty of one another. Don't know how it'll turn out.