phew, thanks for the clarification... for a while, I thought he was telling it like it is.

IINM, Suarez did say Liverpool had not done enough to protect him over racism row with Evra in his Autobiography.

Whatever what was written in whatever book doesn't matter,
what matter most is delivering the result, delivering the performance.

A book can talk super nice on the manager, but performance on the pitch is awful, what the use of the book?
Same with,
a book can talk how bad/harsh the manager is but the manager constantly deliver and chunk out good performance.

League position is the one won't lie.

The book is a load of bullcrap.

I'd listen to Jamie and Gary any day of the year.

Thanks for your advice, sir.

So I can't post my opinions here?

Then don't label my opinion as constant drivelling la.

If BR still can deliver without Suarez (the loss of Suarez being compensated by >100 mil spending), then it proves he is indeed a good manager that can manage team on top.
A good manager always (without money to spend, then another story) can deliver despite change of personnel.

There is no contradiction on the claim of Suarez make BR good. As if BR is really good, he should be able to deliver as well (people may not expect to be second again, but not as poor as current display is).

So far the claim Suarez make BR look good still rather valid unless proven otherwise, by then this claim should be retracted.

Regarding BR played into strength of Suarez, it is the manager job that being paid few mil annual wages to deliver result and set right the team.

If it clicked, both deserved applaud.
If doesn't, then it is manager responsibility to get it right.

The different between average manager and top manager, top manager like

AF's, his team changed so many personnel, from Cantona, Beckham, Keane, Ronaldo, Rooney, MU still able to win the league and stay on top.

Same with AW, consistent at top 4, despite changing many players around.

Same with Mourinho, managing different players, different team, still winning or stay near on top.

You don't see their team crumbling down straight away (yes, performance may drop down but not as poor as being battled by relegation threaten team), from heaven to hell just because loss of one player, even though he is world class. Unless there is no money to spend upon, then yes, it could send the team crumbling down, without any property replacement, which is not the case for Liv after spending >100 mil.

No eye see gonna ignore this season again like 2-3 seasons ago..  Back to my humble personality when i meet up with my Manchester/arsenal frens

BBL!

You really like what BR has showed in Liv since the season start? 
Never mind, everyone entitled for their like. 

Everyone already said Balo doesn't work with lone striker, as well as the team currently, yet, BR stubbornly put the same formation every match.

How many time that criticism about 4-5-1, 4-3-3 doesn't work with current set up and personnel?
Set aside how poor the new BR's recruit is. 

No people want to win anything here,    but the performance was simply awful, that's where the criticism about BR.
Criticism /= calling for sack, it is a wake up call for the manager to rectify something obvious not right at the moment.
It is not one match or two of poor performance, but series of matches since the season started.

Talk about Soton, many were impress with their standings now, but I am more impress with their defends.

Only conceded 5 goals after 10 league games, and 2 of their back 4 is new.. Lets just raid their defensive coach. 

Looking at Arsenal...boy none of the players we bought in our 100m spree got the impact of Sanchez. Would rather spend all that money on one player if we'd known it'll turn out like this