
AMD (Malaysia) Official Thread
AMD (Malaysia) Official Thread
|
|
May 26 2016, 02:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#181
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
We'll be at the fair! See you guys around!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2016, 12:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#182
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(Gregyong @ May 28 2016, 08:28 PM) doesn't work since forever Hrmmm. Looks like something we might have to look into.You need to download from the CCC page for one that works |
|
|
Jun 12 2016, 12:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#183
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
|
|
|
Jun 12 2016, 12:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#184
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2016, 11:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#185
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
Getting excited over the RX480 yet?
|
|
|
Jul 2 2016, 01:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#186
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
One thing to note that the number of RX 480 that has that PCI-E issue is very little, at least based on what we know. We are investigating on why it's happening.
The RX 480 meets PCI-E compliance testing with PCI-SIG. This is not just our internal testing. As for the reports, looks like there are a few that exhibiting this anomalous behavior and we've been in touch with these reviewers to understand how this could be possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 2 2016, 04:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#187
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
|
|
|
Jul 2 2016, 04:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#188
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE As you know, we continuously tune our GPUs in order to maximize their performance within their given power envelopes and the speed of the memory interface, which in this case is an unprecedented 8Gbps for GDDR5. Recently, we identified select scenarios where the tuning of some RX 480 boards was not optimal. Fortunately, we can adjust the GPU’s tuning via software in order to resolve this issue. We are already testing a driver that implements a fix, and we will provide an update to the community on our progress on Tuesday. AMD HQ. 5th July 2016. |
|
|
Jul 6 2016, 11:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#189
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
We promised an update today (July 5, 2016) following concerns around the Radeon™ RX 480 drawing excess current from the PCIe bus. Although we are confident that the levels of reported power draws by the Radeon RX 480 do not pose a risk of damage to motherboards or other PC components based on expected usage, we are serious about addressing this topic and allaying outstanding concerns. Towards that end, we assembled a worldwide team this past weekend to investigate and develop a driver update to improve the power draw. We’re pleased to report that this driver—Radeon Software 16.7.1—is now undergoing final testing and will be released to the public in the next 48 hours.
In this driver we’ve implemented a change to address power distribution on the Radeon RX 480 – this change will lower current drawn from the PCIe bus. Separately, we’ve also included an option to reduce total power with minimal performance impact. Users will find this as the “compatibility” UI toggle in the Global Settings menu of Radeon Settings. This toggle is “off” by default. Finally, we’ve implemented a collection of performance improvements for the Polaris architecture that yield performance uplifts in popular game titles of up to 3%1. These optimizations are designed to improve the performance of the Radeon RX 480, and should substantially offset the performance impact for users who choose to activate the “compatibility” toggle. AMD is committed to delivering high quality and high performance products, and we’ll continue to provide users with more control over their product’s performance and efficiency. We appreciate all the feedback so far, and we’ll continue to bring further performance and performance/W optimizations to the Radeon RX 480. 1: Based on data running ’Total War: Warhammer’, ultra settings, 1080p resolution. Radeon Software 16.6.2 74.2FPS vs Radeon Software 16.7.1 78.3FPS; Metro Last Light, very high settings, 1080p resolution, 80.9FPS vs 82.7 FPS. Witcher 3, Ultra settings, 1440p, 31.5FPS vs 32.5, Far Cry 4, ultra settings, 1440p, 54.65FPS vs 56.38FPS, 3DMark11 Extreme, 22.8 vs 23.7 System config: Core i7-5960X, 16GB DDR4-2666MHz, Gigabyte X99-UD4, Windows 10 64-bit. Performance figures are not average, may vary from run-to-run. ------------------- ![]() |
|
|
Jul 17 2016, 01:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#190
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
RSVP now for the official KL Polaris launch event!
![]() |
|
|
Jul 25 2018, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#191
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0598sec
0.18
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 05:39 AM |