QUOTE(mydragoon @ Sep 17 2014, 09:18 AM)
From what mention by Samsung and test by Display Mate.Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Official Thread V1, 4th Generation phablet by Samsung
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Official Thread V1, 4th Generation phablet by Samsung
|
|
Sep 17 2014, 10:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2014, 01:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
QUOTE(((Xa))0102 @ Sep 17 2014, 11:57 AM) I never forgot. Read proper, is Samsung said manage to reduce juiced and display mate also mention this new 2k AMOLED display is much juice saving than market FHD LCD.This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Sep 17 2014, 01:18 PM |
|
|
Sep 17 2014, 01:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
QUOTE(((Xa))0102 @ Sep 17 2014, 01:13 PM) Samsung mention 7% better power consumption than Note 3. :)DisplayMate mention 30% better power consumption than market FHD LCD. This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Sep 17 2014, 01:20 PM |
|
|
Sep 17 2014, 01:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2014, 06:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2014, 11:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2014, 07:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2014, 01:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2014, 05:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2014, 07:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
QUOTE(((Xa))0102 @ Sep 19 2014, 02:55 AM) Galaxy S5 and Note 4 reportedly getting Android L in late November or early December ![]() Historically Samsung hasn’t exactly been lighting fast with updates, and a lot of that has to do with the fact that its devices don’t just run stock Android, they run Android with TouchWiz on top. Preparing and testing a custom build like this takes extra time, or so that’s usually the given excuse. With Android L, Google released a developer preview months ahead of the expected final release and many believed this could be the beginning of changes that could see OEMs push out updates quicker. For those curious when Samsung might roll out Android L to its 2014 flagships (Galaxy S5 and Note 4), a new report from SamMobile claims it could be coming towards the end of November or early December. Most of the rumors suggest that the final build of Android L should debut sometime in early October, likely alongside the HTC Nexus 9, and so that makes Samsung’s supposed timeframe reasonably speedy — if it’s accurate. SamMobile says that the news comes from their “insiders” but even if this timeline is legit, delays happen and this could simply be when unlocked versions will see the update with carriers getting it much later. Either way, we’d say there’s a good chance that at least the Note 4 and Galaxy S5 will see Android L this year, but we wouldn’t get our hopes up just yet. --Android Authority QUOTE(Xirality @ Sep 19 2014, 05:00 AM) It is great to know about this. Just wonder when Google is going to officially announced final version of this Android L. :)This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Sep 19 2014, 07:17 AM |
|
|
Sep 19 2014, 02:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
Sep 20 2014, 03:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
QUOTE(WhatMan @ Sep 20 2014, 12:27 PM) I like my Note II unfortunately perhaps the history of drops, and repairs, its now becoming a bit unstable. A bit of bending the unit will cause it to reboot. Note 4 is definate worth upgrade if you came from Note II.Camera also dead had to replace with after market unit and now pic is not as sharp as before. So I desperately need another unit of similar size. Xperia Z3 and Note IV is my target but I heard bad things about Xperia line. Z3 wise unless you loving manual mode in camera, Sony auto mode still not so good. |
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 04:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 04:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
QUOTE(dlsl @ Sep 21 2014, 09:51 AM) If the tested result from hitech and displaymate test is accurate, note 4 should be performed better than average under direct sunlight due to the high brightness (~600cd/m2) low screen Reflectance. Camera part day light both great.I think the photo taken from note 4 camera also appear more natural color compare with iphone 6+ pic which appear more saturated. But the note 4 photo taken with flash is slightly wash out vs iphone 6+ But in night time, no deny iPhone 6 plus much better as it can control greater in light source (example lamp) without light bleed. It is the best night photo I ever seen out from mobile camera! Now make me even harder decide which to pick... ... This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Sep 21 2014, 04:10 PM |
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 06:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
QUOTE(XeactorZ @ Sep 21 2014, 06:02 PM) note 4 spotted in sirim database, however is stating n910c instead n910s In this case, I need to test out before decide. If not suite me then I go buy at Singapore. seems like we getting exynos version, yay or nay :hmm: ![]() But base on benchmark, Exynos 5433 is far better than S805. http://www.gsmarena.com/exynos_5433_gets_b...5-news-8838.php QUOTE(Abk92 @ Sep 21 2014, 06:30 PM) Seriously I prefer exynos rather than snapdragon... I think some mistake on that, S805 is CAT6 while Exynos is CAT4.![]() Exynos already octa-core + using cortex a53n a57 the latest one Snapdragon 810 later will use that cortex.. so we can see that exynoss far far away now from snapdragon haha correct me if I'm wrong :nod: This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Sep 21 2014, 06:52 PM |
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 07:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
QUOTE(edtai @ Sep 21 2014, 07:16 PM) Sound like Samsung Malaysia or Samsung global sale strategic team is going to screw the Malaysia market if we are getting exynos instead of snapdragon. Also, we are going to get NOTE 4 only without EDGE. But Singapore is going to get both! Actually Thailand also is Exynos. India always is Exynos. Let see how Samsung will die in Malaysia market as what i have forecast for their S5 after they launch it. I thought they mention Exynos only at Korea itself but now seems is not! |
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 07:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
QUOTE(tarm @ Sep 21 2014, 07:19 PM) For once i would love to have exynos version. Yes, seems Exynos is better in terms of spec, but I really need to test out first this time before direct buy. A57 architecture? Why not. And 20nm manufacturing process, which should translated into cooler phone compared to 28nm snapdragon 805. Unlike last year this time qualcomm seems a bit slow in their development. If it is extreme smooth then I don't might. Higher scores in antutu never means is smooth. This already proved in MTK chipset use in Redmi Note. |
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 07:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 08:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
Sep 21 2014, 08:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
29,773 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: Johor, Malaysia. |
QUOTE(dlsl @ Sep 21 2014, 07:59 PM) I prefer the exynos 5433 also. it is a 64bit processor, 20nm soc, new armV8 SOC. Ya, to get big support on Exynos, Samsung need release source and make the rest country, at least in UK also is Exynos.Android L is natively support in ART. Just hope that, samsung will enable the AArch64 mode in android L. According anandtech, exynos 5433 is running on AArch32 mode, 32bit compatible mode (due to kitkat??): http://www.anandtech.com/show/8537/samsung...-a57a53-arm-soc there is a poll in xda for snapdragon or exynos soc for note 4. Currently, exynos soc is slightly ahead of snapdragon http://forum.xda-developers.com/note-4/gen...t2868247/page14 |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0505sec
0.72
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 07:16 PM |