Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V13

views
     
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 15 2014, 09:26 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


A fighter plane has crashed-landed near Chengdu, most probably a J-10B test plane. Pilot ejected successfully and is safe.

user posted image

user posted image

At least we know the ejection seat works tongue.gif

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Nov 15 2014, 09:27 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 15 2014, 09:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


'Jinghai' Unmanned Surface Vehicle developed especially for Chinese Coast Guard
QUOTE
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

MilitaryMadness
post Nov 17 2014, 08:34 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


PLA Navy formally commissions Type 056 Corvette number 19, christened 'Sanmenxia'

user posted image
The Sanmenxia on its commissioning ceremony

user posted image
Naval officers and representatives of the city of Sanmenxia in attendance during the commissioning ceremony

user posted image
Naval officers and representatives of the city of Sanmenxia is given a tour of the Sanmenxia after its commissioning ceremony

user posted image
The bronze sculpture to be installed on board the Sanmenxia, as a gift from the city to the ship bearing its name

The PLA Navy has formally commissioned the 19th production ship of the Type 056 Corvette christened 'Sanmenxia' (pennant number 593). It is one of the Type 056A ASW variant corvettes, optimized for ASW operations.

The commissioning ceremony was conducted on 13.11.2014 at a naval facility at Zhoushan province. Guests include the Mayor and representatives of the city of Sanmenxia, who was present to hand over and commemorate a bronze sculpture representing the city to be installed on the ship.

The Sanmenxia will be joining the East Sea Fleet and be based at Ningbo Naval headquarters, Zhejiang province.

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Nov 17 2014, 09:01 AM
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 17 2014, 10:54 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


Pro-Russian separatist militias increase use of heavy artillery to offset disadvantages over government forces

user posted image
A 152mm 2A65 heavy artillery used by pro-Russian militias to shell Ukrainian positions near Debaltseve, eastern Ukraine

QUOTE
As Russian-backed separatists in Ukraine dig in for a long war, they’re relying more and more on heavy artillery to match Kiev’s army.

Howitzers are nothing new to the conflict, and the drumbeat of artillery explosions has become part of eastern Ukraine’s ambient soundscape.

But within the past few days, the rebels have received a lot more of the big guns—and most likely from Russia.

Videos uploaded to social media showed one convoy near the town of Snizhne—near the Russian border—consisting of nearly 40 unmarked Kamaz military trucks hauling 18 towed artillery pieces. Owing to their size, ballistic shields and wheels, the guns resemble 2A65 Msta-B howitzers.

These 152-millimeter guns are some of the biggest in the Russian inventory, and have more than double the range of the separatists’ 122-millimeter D-30 guns. The Associated Press spotted a similar convoy in Snizhne.

Several of the vehicles resemble support and radio trucks, because of their conspicuous shielded exteriors used to block electromagnetic interference.

The convoy included a single unarmed BTR-80—likely a command or forward observer vehicle for the artillery. This makes the convoy roughly the size of a Russian artillery battalion.

On the same day, monitors from Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe witnessed the same convoy in Makeevka—on the road from Snizhne—headed west toward Donetsk. But the OSCE described the convoy as having smaller 122-millimeter guns, an OSCE spot report noted.

Either way, that’s a lot of guns, and just one of three convoys on the move in Ukraine on Nov. 8. The others included tanks—in a sign of even more heavy weapons pouring into the conflict.

The guns might give the separatists enough firepower to dislodge Ukrainian troops holding the strategic Donetsk Sergey Prokofiev International Airport just outside the city. If the rebels are trying to establish a breakaway state based in Donetsk, they need that airport.

Sunday morning marked some of the heaviest fighting in Ukraine in a month, with the worst centered around the airport, according to the Wall Street Journal. Ukrainian activists are also fearing a major offensive.

Classic Russian tactic for countering a more capable enemy, blast them to hell and back with heavy artillery. Little wonder Russian calls artillery 'The God of war'.

Source

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Nov 17 2014, 11:05 AM
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 17 2014, 02:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


Pakistan 'in talks' to possible purchase of FC-31 Stealth Fighters

user posted image
J-31 Prototype

Looks like the J-31/FC-31 project may yet go forward.

The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) is in talks with China to buy 30 to 40 of the Shenyang FC-31 twin-engined stealth fighter displayed at Airshow China 2014 in Zhuhai, a senior Pakistani government official has revealed to IHS Jane's .

"The discussions are beyond initial inquiries and they fit into the pattern of Pakistan being the first export customer of Chinese [military] hardware," said the official.

The FC-31 was unveiled as an export model at Zhuhai, although a prototype with the J-31 designation has been flying at a Shenyang Aircraft Corporation facility since 2012.

Janes
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 17 2014, 09:32 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Nov 17 2014, 09:17 PM)
And among the 6x6 candidates, Anoa pindad have export license problem, french VAB can get very quickly but it's second-hand stuff
*
Why not get light MRAP-type vehicle?
Most manufacturers offer MRAP as off-the-shelf buy also, no need to wait for production. Protection also top-notch quality. Situation in Lebanon seems very good MRAP country, where danger is from IED or ambushes. Plus side also MRAP are defensive in nature so fits nicely with UN powers.

user posted image

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Nov 17 2014, 09:44 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 17 2014, 09:52 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(thpace @ Nov 17 2014, 09:46 PM)
If mrap...can get US ones? Since they have so  many to get rid off. It cheap or even free.

Though the only problem i can think off.. it heavy, potential maintenance headache and makan minyak

Other than those, any issues of us having US used mrap?
*
I'd prefer new MRAPs, that way we can ask for some maintenance support (like spare parts) in the purchase contract with manufacturer.

"heavy, potential maintenance headache and makan minyak'? hehe you're talking aout 90% of all military vehicles la like that bro biggrin.gif

I don't think we have any problems or restrictions with US, also by nature these types of vehicles not very high tech like fighters or navy ships that US sometimes are reluctant to sell to other countries because of their tech. But again I prefer we make business with countries that are already friendly with us or with more liberal arms sales policy.

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Nov 17 2014, 09:54 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 17 2014, 10:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Nov 17 2014, 09:53 PM)
UN mission is high-tempo type of deployment, with almost daily patrols, high fuel consumption and high vehicle turnover to maintenance.. not sure they can bear that  sweat.gif
*
I don't understand why all the fuss is about MRAPs being heavy, with high fuel consumption and hard to service & maintain? All military vehicles are guilty of that.

-Armored vehicles are heavy (obviously)
-Heavy vehicles need powerful engines that gulps down fuel
-Most military vehicles have parts especially made for that vehicle or a few like it (due to task specialization, for example a tank will need different parts from a transport truck), so of course la hard to get parts

Tell me what military vehicle don't have the above problems?

US problems with MRAPs stem due to the fact they bought off-the-shelf many MRAP types from many manufacturers (in order to bulk up the numbers) , so naturally US military will need different parts for each MRAP from each different manufacturers and each type will need its own specialized maintenance routine. That is the actual problem with the US MRAP program, too many types from too many manufacturers. It is a myth to say the fact that MRAPs themselves are problematic.

If US military got MRAPs from normal military channels, the problems won't be so apparent.

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Nov 17 2014, 10:09 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 17 2014, 11:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(thpace @ Nov 17 2014, 11:26 PM)
Malaysia soil not realy good for wheels vehicles. Confirm stuck or not least slow down.

Tracked are more resilient.

Thought, i always  wonder we have the  option to get the mordern t90 instead we opt for those poland soviet design tanks. Not that, i say it bad but why take an old design when we was officially offered one of the latest.
*
The irony with your statement is that until very recently, nearly the majority all our military vehicles are wheeled (Condor, Panhard, Ferret, V-100 Commando & Sibmas) with tracked vehicles only a very few exceptions (Scorpion & Stormer).

Even with newer vehicles like MIFV (Adnan) and PT-91, these are very few and far between compared to the many hundreds of wheeled armored vehicles we are still using.

And don't get me started on AV8....confirm will stuck la laugh.gif

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Nov 17 2014, 11:44 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 18 2014, 12:39 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Nov 17 2014, 09:45 PM)
At least 6x6 more stable on hilly roads? the 4x4 condor is ady involved in several accident there..
6x6 mrap maybe?
*
The problem is most 6x6 MRAPs are mammoth beasts the size of buses that aren't exactly very conducive for peacekeeping operations. A huge MRAP might give wrong signals to the parties involved.

That's why for me, the best peacekeeping operations are run by small humvee or land rover-type vehicles. I prefer if we can get some smaller category 1 MRAPs that's a bit larger than land rovers but not as large as most 6x6 MRAPs. Price is cheaper, lighter weight, easier to maintain because they mostly use commercial truck parts & engines, can carry good amount of 5-6 infantrymen if needed and most importantly they have that 'peacekeeper' look to them (military, but not too much military).

Basically we'll be using them as armored land rovers laugh.gif











MilitaryMadness
post Nov 18 2014, 06:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Nov 18 2014, 01:04 AM)
Any love for v-hull recon vehicle? they're practically also mine-resistant and can stand small arms fire also most size like humvee
Iveco lynx looks like ordinary military 4wd but with v-hull
*
Yes, lots of love,although protection not as good as MRAPs. Turkey makes some good ones, made by Otokar, like Cobra and Scorpion.

user posted image
Otokar Akrep (Scorpion)

user posted image
Otokar Cobra

Plus Turkey already BFF with Malaysia, I'm sure if we are serious we can get some easy. thumbup.gif



MilitaryMadness
post Nov 18 2014, 03:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(thpace @ Nov 18 2014, 12:40 PM)
It was also claimed, that how the russian develop their latest rpg to counter mordern aps systen.
*
How bout this one? 3 warheads in one system! biggrin.gif
user posted image
RPG-30 system

How it's supposed to work:
user posted image

They left out the part where the smaller projectile is supposed to engage the hard-kill APS of any tank and clear the way for the main projectile, which itself is a tandem-charge warhead to impact the tank and any additional ERA/passive armor. Sources say the delay between the two projectiles is 0.2 seconds, slow enough for the main projectile to avoid the APS system targeting the smaller projectile but too fast for the APS to re-engage the incoming main warhead projectile.

user posted image

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Nov 18 2014, 03:24 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 18 2014, 04:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(yinchet @ Nov 18 2014, 04:06 PM)
Get type 10 mbt habis cerita.
*
user posted image

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Nov 18 2014, 04:49 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 18 2014, 06:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


Mahindra 6x6 MRAP vehicle

user posted image

nod.gif






MilitaryMadness
post Nov 18 2014, 07:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(thpace @ Nov 18 2014, 07:03 PM)
No.. get k2 habis cerita. New gen minus the mtu issues
*
Again:
user posted image

21 Pages « < 19 20 21
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0581sec    0.76    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 05:29 PM