Recommendation for New Tyre 205/55R16, Intend to get new tyres to replace NCT5
|
|
 Sep 15 2014, 02:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
48 posts Joined: Jun 2007  
|
QUOTE(overfloe @ Sep 10 2014, 10:18 AM) GR100 is too cheap for a bridgestone.. so strange considering the previous model GR90 was very expensive for its class. its same marketing strategy used by michelin when PP2 to PS3 GR100 no longer their premium comfort series tire |
|
|
Sep 15 2014, 03:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
48 posts Joined: Jun 2007
|
QUOTE(Ekash @ Sep 15 2014, 02:55 PM) So what replace it as premium type? no idea not really familiar with bridgestone tire |
|
|
Mar 1 2016, 11:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
48 posts Joined: Jun 2007
|
QUOTE(alexei @ Dec 23 2015, 07:16 PM) Correction, BAX2 wet braking is 7.0, where as wet cornering is 8.0. if really BAX2 is quiter than C.drive2/bluearth triple-maxPS3 ST is 7.5 and 9.0 respectively. Bear in mind, this one is 215/50R17. That website only tested 16 models of 205/55R16, and the known ones are: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « You drive Proton Preve? BAX2 is tested to be quieter than BluEarth AE01, CDrive2, Assurance TripleMax, RE002 etc, but by insignificant margin. However, if the way they tested the tyres to be true, and to know such matter for a fact, can really put a rest to such arguments. IMO, RE002 Adrenalin has poor wet traction can be expected from the tread. Also, noisier. Other tyre reviews for this size 205/55R16: European Tyre Test ADAC Testing Tyre review 2014 y ppl come and trade in their BAX2 ? those rating are for preference |
| Change to: |  0.0206sec
 0.34
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 08:17 PM |
Quote