yawn...
as expected liao.
after nikon come out with a camera, canon are going to retaliate.
nothing new.
Canon dSLR 350D successor the 400D, It's getting hot, Sony Alpha, Nikon D80
|
|
 Aug 25 2006, 09:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Aug 25 2006, 12:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
pentax how? good or not?
|
|
|
Aug 25 2006, 03:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
canon and nikon are not overrated...
look at their collection of lenses and accessories... |
|
|
Aug 27 2006, 12:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(lgs @ Aug 26 2006, 10:06 AM) http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=297711&st=100 me?here have a similiar topic and some prices references  And while everyone saying D80 is similiar to D200 ,dont forgot so is 400D technology also similiar to 30D , Entry level is still entry level Midrange is still midrange ,we can see it from the Continuos Shoot also (5FPS for midrange ,3FPS for entry) remember entry is still entry ,Nikon using 11 AF point while Canon is 9 AF point ,this doesnt made Nikon entry better then Canon midrange ,from the continuos shoot we can see it ? And I wouldnt believe if D80 will be as fast as D200 ,because NIKON is not stupid ,if its the same ,no one will buy their midrange but all go for D80 , entry is still entry ,midrange is still midrange (from the Continuos shoot FPS we knw Nikon will purposely limit the entry no matter how) Nikon D80(body only) US999 , (18-135) US1299 Canon 400D (body only) US799 , (18-55) US899 Sony @100 (body only) US899 ,(18-70) US999 This is US SRP for 3 10 megapixel entry DSLR. Which one u choose ?  i will go for the nikon. but that's because i already have nikon lenses... |
|
|
Sep 1 2006, 05:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
wow... so cheap geh?
|
|
|
Sep 4 2006, 12:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
so far, no details whatsoever from malaysian's dealer regarding the canon dslr right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 8 2006, 12:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Sep 8 2006, 12:08 PM) as for canon decent lens?what is the decent lens? and how much rather than the kit 50mm 16-35 f2.8 L 24-80 f2.8 L 70-200 f2.8 L IS but dont listen to me... |
|
|
Sep 9 2006, 10:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
today's STAR paper got advertisment.
with kit lens RM 3600+ if i am not mistaken |
|
|
Sep 10 2006, 02:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
RM 3150 is cheap leh...
times square there selling RM 3600, if i am not mistaken. wasn't really interested in this set. was playing with the 5D and the 1D instead. |
|
|
Sep 10 2006, 08:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
a 70-200 or 70-300 telephoto will be good enough. of course the version which is within the RM 600 range lah.
if possible, go for the canon instead of the 3rd parties |
|
|
Oct 1 2006, 12:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
because f1.4 is expensive.
another dilemma. why get f1.4 when there's a f1.2 (USD 1,600) |
| Change to: |  0.0155sec
 0.45
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 09:08 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.