Umm....I'm not very sure what you are talking about? Could you be specific about the various time range you mentioned?

done..
1(b) and 1© how??

Critical_Fallacy, I'm having problem dealing with question no.2(b). The answer given is 2.

This was how I approached the given problem, and I'm stuck:-

Just Visiting By, I'm having problem completing PA graphs under my desired time lately. And to make matters worse, I only managed to complete a given graph(table included) roughly for an hour or longer, safe for a few simpler graphs like graf bar(kompaun/komponen) and graf garis kompaun. I try to coerce myself to complete a graph within 40 minutes during practices, but I fail almost every single time in doing so.

How did you managed to finish your table and graph within 40 minutes? How did you practice for your PA graph?

We were taught to complete the graph in 30 minutes, actually, including draw the tables, drawing the graph and colouring them.

The way to do it is to immediately draw a table by first listing down the data you come across. Be quick with your calculation but make sure don't make mistakes.

It's all about practice. It's only early March, you still have time. Do more practice.

Since you're training for speed, you do not need new questions. Repeat the questions you have done numerous time would be sufficient.

Thanks for your advice.

So far, I'm quite alright with graf bar kompaun/komponen and graf garis. But, what trouble me the most are these: graf bar cermin/piramid, and carta pai bandingan/bertingkat(silinder). Personally, carta pai bertingkat(silinder) is my Achilles heel.

But, I think I still need to get my hands on as many questions as I can, because I want to be able to master every single type of graphs/tables and at the same time, manage them under 40 minutes. This looks like a near impossible task for me right now, but I hope I'll be able to accomplish that feat.

Wow, only 30 minutes! Unbelievable! Your PA teacher must be an expert in his/her teachings. Truth be told, I believe at most, I'm only be able to complete the table under 20 to 25 minutes.

maximR, in my previous post #903, I made a mistake somewhere in my calculation. Is it safe to assume that the mass of charge W is equivalent to the mass of charge X,?

If that assumption of mine is correct, then I will obtain 2 as my final answer.

Double post.

This post has been edited by RED-HAIR-SHANKS: Mar 5 2015, 10:42 PM

Well it's more on practice than teaching. The steps are the same, and our teachers can't help us to do it fast. We'll have to train your speed.

30 minutes is our limits, you can try through practice.

I don't think I can answer that, perhaps you'd want to ask somebody else? I vaguely remember the relationship between mass and charge in magnetism, but I haven't learned anything other than basic SPM magnetism. Try Googling that.

But I'll re-read the question tomorrow when I can actually think straight; I just reached home (from college), exhausted beyond words.

Specific charge = q/m , you will learn it very soon in the same chapter .

Just a while ago, I found out the formula for specific charge of ions, .

But, if I were to redo my working again:-

Based on question:



And now, instead of getting 2, my final answer is 1/2. Where did I go wrong?

Actually you have found the answer. Refer to your own post #903, you can work from there to get the answer.

maximR, here I have 2 different methods in solving the integration of: ∫secθtanθsecθ dθ. Both methods seem correct to me, but, they yield different answers.

Method 1:
-Let f(x)=secθ
-So f'(x)=secθtanθ




Method 2:
-Let f(x)=tanθ
-So f'(x)=sec²θ



Which is acceptable?

They are the same, remember your identity involving tan(x)?

-deleted-

This post has been edited by Bean17: Mar 10 2015, 04:05 PM

I just finished MUET writing tests last Saturday.
Just one conclusion: Horrible!

Reading Paper and Writing Paper is much more harder compared to November session (yes I'd expected that). I did very badly for writing paper. I even committed the most serious error ever in writing - forgot to state my stand on the statement and TOTALLY WROTE ONE POINT OUT OF THE QUESTION!!!!!

Devastating isn't it? All my friends and classmates are doing very well in the test except for me. Looks like Lady Luck isn't by my side this time, despite the preparations that I'd made.

Hey guys, anyone taking PA, SEJ, EKO, PP package? Semester 2 is totally a disaster, new syllabus, 2 kerja kursuses... I think I'm going to suffer alot on revisions. Duh!

I don't take that combination but my friend does. But as far as I know, this package is the most easiest package in form six.

Just Visiting By RED-HAIR-SHANKS Can you help me with this essay question?
"Kepercayaan kepada Tuhan" merujuk kepada pegangan dan penghayatan keagamaan. Penghayatan agama mampu menangani dan menyelesaikan masalah keruntuhan moral remaja masa ini, namum wujud pengabaian yang ketara dalam aspek ini oleh sesetengah ibu bapa dan para remaja. Bincangkan.

What's the kehendak soalan? My kehendak is Kepentingan agama dalam menangani keruntuhan moral remaja and sebab-sebab ibu bapa dan remaja (only) mengabaikan kepentingan agama. Is is correct?

My points are:
Kepentingan agama dalam menangani keruntuhan moral remaja:
1. menjadi batasan kepada kelakuan jahat
2. mengisi kekosongan jiwa

sebab-sebab ibu bapa dan remaja (only) mengabaikan kepentingan agama:
1. ibu bapa lebih bersifat materialistik
2. ibu bapa tidak mempunyai ilmu pengetahuan tentang agama dan tidak menjadi contoh teladan yang baik
3. remaja pada masa kini mementingkan pencapaian akademik dan peralatan elektronik melebihi pencapaian akhlak dan rohaniah

The first part is correct but the second part is not. I got all the points penalised as 'Tak Relevan'. Why?

Secondly, if you failed to complete the graph, is it considered as 'salah media' and you only get 1 mark for the graph and 1 mark for the table?