Saga Fl Auto, Buying 2nd hand
|
|
 Jun 10 2014, 01:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
72 posts Joined: Sep 2011 
|
If you like power, and you like speed, and you like to kinda save on petrol, go for the FLX. 1.3 or 1.6 FLX also can tapao the FL for sure. The cvt gearbox on the FLX is much better when paired to the Campro than the 4AT in the FL. Heck, even the manual FLX is so much better than the manual in the FL. Just cruise at 110km/h and you'll know what i mean.
|
|
|
Jun 10 2014, 10:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
72 posts Joined: Sep 2011
|
QUOTE(JinLeon @ Jun 10 2014, 05:43 PM) so meaning flx win fl in all condition right? but how come manual flx is better than manual fl? engine and gearbox are the same I believe the Manual FL uses a Getrag GB, whereas a FLX uses an Aichi-Kikai unit (or the other way round). The biggest difference is ofc the gear ratios between the two manual units. And yes, the FLX triumphs over the FL in all departments, even in the handling (stiffer, but overcame the sagging issue with BLMs at the rear) |
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 05:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
72 posts Joined: Sep 2011
|
QUOTE(dares @ Jun 11 2014, 01:01 PM) FL engine is Campro IAFM where as FLX uses the Campro IAFM+. Key difference being the IAFM module and engine tuning, as well as some internal parts. Thanks for pointing out the correct gearbox configurations (which i got mixed up with) haha The gearbox are also different: FL Auto = Mitsubishi 4AT FL manual = Aichi Kikai 5MT FLX Auto = Punch powertrain CVT FLX manual = Getrag 5MT FLX also have stiffer springs and thicker front antiroll bar (21mm vs FL's 19mm).  |
| Change to: |  0.0162sec
 0.44
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 10:21 PM |
Quote