Toyota Corolla Altis 1.8:
Pros:
-Good fc and reliability and comfort.
-Somehow the looks is ok

Cons:
-1.8 doent have all the specs that is offered in 2.0 which I want to have
-If really want a 2.0, will not choose the altis

Hyundai Elantra:
Pros:
-Really like the looks

Cons:
-Reliability of Hyundai
-Resale( dun really care)

Mitsubishi Lancer
Pros:
-2.0 Mivec is good
-18" wheels with multilink suspension is perfect
-The looks is still attractive and handsome after so many years.

Cons:
-Seems to be quite bad in fc based on owner review and online data
-The age for the model is quite old, no major update had been done till now

Honda Civic:
Pros:
-Reliability and fc and comfort lvl is high enough
-Multilink suspension
-Can look good with bodykit

Cons:
-No more honda vtec feel of power
-Very bad spec sheet when compared to other cars

Kia Cerato
Pros:
-equipped with tons of gadgets and specs
-look cool but not my style

Cons:
-reliabilty of Kia
-service center problem
-1.6 not enough omph in power if 2.0 dun feel like getting cerato.
-fc so so

Ford Focus Sedan
Pros:
-Filled with all kinds of features
-Powerful than others
-feels premium a bit

Cons:
-Heard that warranty parts need too long of waiting time
-doesnt feel cool enough
-fc not that low. only slightly ok

Nissan slyphy
Pros:
-reliability, fc, and comfort is good
-quite well equpped
-fc spec sheet looks good

Cons:
-Looks are a bit on uncle side
-doesnt feel new enough

Oh WS2, I read about these IF tungsten disulphide a couple years ago but back then, no product was ever used using this powder or solid lubricant. So casual users like us have very little or no data on it. Heard it used to be very expensive thus although its an excellent lubricant but cost is not practical then.

Not sure abt the current tech tho.

WS2 is a solid-based or originally powder-based addictive mixed with other oils (probably mineral or high grade minerals) with very high lubrication capabilities with its IF nano particles that can adhere to surface and fill in gaps (excellent), it might bond very well onto the engine parts which is a good thing to protect the parts.

However as with all other solid addictive, my main worry is when over long term, these bonded film might also accumulate sediments from the engine oils over a long period of time especially when constantly used near 10K mileage in our humid and dusty driving environments.

I'm not sure if it might eventually clogs the valve and pipeline of the engines over long period of its usage. Unless the brands also produced engine oil THAT you used along with this addictive (which guaranteed compatibility of addictive used), nobody can be sure that these addictive might cause any adverse chemical reaction with other brands addictive. Maybe the nano thingy helps hold sediments in suspension and not sticking to it.

Will this add. addictive chemical reaction cancelling each other out or make its worse or better, nobody can fully testified to its long term effect due to the variety of different engine oils quality used out there.

GOOD quality engine oils are usually formulated to provide very balanced addictive performance between its anti-wear and lubrication properties. Adding of external addictive might unbalanced these formulas and produce adverse effect.

I have to say, its all only in theory as no one can 100% guarantee it will work or not work with certain engine formulas, thus my adverse reaction to extra addictive not of the same brand as engine oil used. Unsure here does not mean addictive is no good, as a matter of fact, many has testified certain addictive working very well above stock oil properties and I can't rebuke that coz it might as well be true.

However due to my old-school thinking, with so many elements of "uncertain" long term performance and durability (no solid data backup yet) I usually avoid such addictive (although they might be highly effective especially with improved tech nowadays) and keep to proven GOOD engine oil / optimal change period schedule that has PROVEN to usually maintain a vehicle in tip top performance over a long period of time.

It is only my 2 cents and I might have been ENTIRELY WRONG ABOUT IT. A lot of other sifu probably can input in detail MUCH better than me coz I usually only know the overview and can likely KICK my ass again for bullshitting.
My view does not apply to racing kaki tho, these guys know what addictive to use to fine-tune boost their engine (albeit shorter life or not), so to give those extra oomph and performance by seconds.

Final conclusion of WS2 :  I know nuts about it.....hahahahaha       Cabut again....

ps..since I type so long since I very free now, bound to have a lot of mistake but I make sure no gear ratio was mention...ya...but other mistake I' don't know....if found, that is old Cavino with jiken comes alive typing, screw him...