QUOTE(RAMChYLD @ Aug 15 2014, 10:57 PM)
There is two flaws to ISDB from what I can see
Firstly, it means switching our workflow over to 60Hz. Malaysia historically uses 50Hz. ISDB is a 60Hz system. Cameras have to be changed (not a problem if the studio hasn't upgraded to HD yet, but if they have, it will be an expensive exercise to replace the 50Hz HD cam with 60Hz ones), and then lighting because using 60Hz camera with 50Hz lighting causes flicker. Converter equipment to play back older 50Hz PAL archived material will be needed at TV stations. Ultimately it will need TNB to change our country to 60Hz power, which will cause issues with equipment hard wired for 50Hz like air conditioning, ice cream maker and even fridge.
Secondly, ISDB requires use of mandatory license cards (B-CAS card), which equals bringing back TV license. While I don't mind paying for license if it will increase the quality of the TV shows airing, I do mind the risk that the money will only get songlap.
The Japanese ISDB-T system has a 1 stone kill 2 birds thing advantage by just using 1 unified transmitter.
While on paper DVB-T looks superior the implementation costs can easily double if you plan to reuse the same transmission for both mobile and home TV transmission. It already has 2nd gen specs out while ISDB-T is still in its 1st gen.
The westerners are good at cheating consumers to fork out more all the time.
Japan has a proven successful 1-Seg mobile TV market. It is already commercialized for many years.
Brazil improvised the tech by using more refined MPEG-4 compression tech.