QUOTE(StoKe @ Aug 8 2006, 06:37 PM)
is quite a big surprise that my thread got so many reply in such a short time. First to all, I should apologies to those that think that my altitude got problem on search job (i assume that ppls think that I'm arrogant and picky on job, money minded, rite ?).Is my bad that I didn't stated clear about the scenario and the job offered.
No prob. Guess you're not a snob after all.
QUOTE
1st case, The melaka company (company M), I got a fren's fren (called it Mr. A) work in there, Mr. A also a fresh graduate, however, he had work in another company for 2 month then only join the company M, and they offered him a salary of RM2.4k with OT allowance of RM50/3hr. The position he work is non-related to technical (related to project management,process,dealing with customer,etc). However for the position that I being offered is 80% technical (as told from the interviewer), but the salary I being offered are merely RM2k. So for sure, not matter how your own mentality are, once you know that there got another ppl in similar situation with you, however the salary being offered are different, what will you think about it ?
Some ppl believe that handling people/ability to communicate is the most difficult job in the world, that's why PR folks can get quite a good pay.
QUOTE
3rd case, the 2.2k post in johor, ok, this one so far i can said that is qutie reasonable, R & D Engineer, no allowance except OT (RM25/3hr). But problem is the job scope, even is R & D, but I need to handling 50% technical and 50% for non technical, such as deal with customer, operator, production line, testing,blablabla, (i cant remember all), initially I was shocked on the job scope, however they explained to me that it for my own benefit, cos i can learn more, one thing i remember clearly is that they said: "without those exp, wat if u develop sth that cant be put into production line to be manufacture, then it will be a problem to you", emm, sound reasonable to me. However after seeking advice from my lecturer, he told me that I shouldn't divide my attention on so many aspect, if want to go into R & D, I should emphasize on it, to gain deeper knowledge on certain technology. Tats y I also headache.
I actually think it's good that you get 50:50 coverage on both the technical and non-technical aspects. Dealing with the production line and operators will give you a feel of how things work on the grassroots level.
One thing about lecturers dispensing advice is that many of them have never worked outside the academic circle so they might not have the 'real world' experience to actually give usable advice. But this is just my point-of-view, as almost all my lecturers went straight to teach after grad.
This post has been edited by cks2k2: Aug 9 2006, 07:46 AM