QUOTE(LTZ @ May 29 2014, 10:48 AM)
Then the answer is.........
Military Thread V12, 31/8 Merdeka; 16/9 Malaysia Day
Military Thread V12, 31/8 Merdeka; 16/9 Malaysia Day
|
|
May 29 2014, 10:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
|
|
|
May 31 2014, 09:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(thpace @ May 31 2014, 03:46 AM) everywhere in SEA got new militray purchase, we are one of the only that have not done any significant purchase apart from the Gowind purchase Again...AV8 project is way too expensive. With $2.4 billion, that's equal to $10 million per vehicle, more expensive than the most expensive MBTs in the market, K2 and Leclerc.but from the rumored gowind specs, kinda a little disappointment that it cant even afford a proper ciws for that kind of price So many list to buy but no money spared by govement Is it really necessary to spend that much on the R&D of an APC platform? APCs are disposable assets in the battlefield. Like relatively high destruction rate of M113 in Vietnam and BTRs in Afghanistan. APCs are supposed to be cheap and no one would expect them to last long in more intense engagements. As comparison, Indonesia modifies the basic VAB design. ![]() It becomes Anoa, the gun turret is move behind the driver to provide more room and make RCWS installation easier. Also an extra pair of wheels are added. Including weapons, Anoa only costs $800,000 and multiple variants have been developed. ![]() Yes....the interior is simple; just like a truck with navigation, communication and perhaps BMS in some units. But at least it is cheap, won't miss it if a couple of them destroyed in battles. ![]() This post has been edited by Frozen_Sun: May 31 2014, 09:25 AM |
|
|
May 31 2014, 10:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ May 31 2014, 09:52 AM) K2 in early production cost more than usd15mil. Yes...Anoa is more like a cold-war APC platform, comparable to M113 and BTR-60. While AV8, is from a new generation of APC, placed in the same category with Stryker and Terrex.now they manage to drive it down toward usd9mil depending on equipment adding on. Amx still farking expensive fully equip with all the gadget it will cost you around usd27mil As for AV8 the biggest problem it have is to developed 12 variants in one go. That crazy and over ambitious, it certainly will drive up the cost significantly. too many variant; too little on economy of scale. Apparently those who involved in these deal forget that we are not US. Well currently APC is no longer cheaps as it use to be, now it developed into a whole new level of ifv, take cv90s or amv for example it take them billions of dollars to developed into current level. Lastly I dun think it fairs to compare anoa and av8. Av8 is on different level in term of protection, situation awareness, ncw, weapons, and role in the battlefield. But these new vehicles still carry the same APC genetics; simply different species from the "APC genus". Expensive APCs are ideal only for countries with huge military budget. The job remains the same, transport troops safely and protect them from small arms fire and mortar shrapnel; also providing basic fire support. These functions can be achieved by older platforms that cost less than $1 million. Larger proportion of APCs are usually destroyed in conflicts, they should be "disposable" and cheap. ![]() Indonesia will convert an infantry brigade (3 battalions) into mechanized units in East Java alone with Anoa. This can be achieved relatively quickly, because Anoa is cheap and simple. But still provides basic capabilities for mechanized units. ![]() http://www.antarajatim.com/lihat/berita/13...ekanik-di-jatim This post has been edited by Frozen_Sun: May 31 2014, 10:40 AM |
|
|
May 31 2014, 10:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(azriel @ May 31 2014, 10:41 AM) The question is does Boustead really need an upgrade? Four modules are built by PT PAL....2 have been confirmed. Rumors say that up to 6 units will be built.Remember PT.PAL also is in a Tot Scheme with Damen for building the Sigma PKR 10514 with a 2 ships programme. PT.PAL didn't need any upgrades to it's shipyard. The only thing that PT.PAL need is to build is for the submarine facility & machines for the korean sub. ![]() |
|
|
May 31 2014, 12:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ May 31 2014, 11:05 AM) well depend on doctrine for apc. Perhaps, it is the matter where we should prioritize quality...on APC, artillery or tank?Some treat it as low cost disposable battle taxi but it only apply on those whose have large quantities of infantry. some prefer high qualities of apc and ifv to provide valuable fire support, intel, scouts, anti tank, anti air and protection for its infantry. lots of country going toward quality values One AV8 is equal in cost to two units of Leopard 2RI. The tank is one of the ground assets with high technological quality. ![]() ![]() Again, I know we shouldn't compare MBT with APC. But, the money should be spent accordingly to get the biggest bang for the buck. 103 Leopard 2 and 50 marder IFV for less than $300 million. Also, to mechanize one infantry battalion, TNI only needs to spend $45 million with simpler APCs. Instead of buying AV8, perhaps Malaysia could settle with building simpler APCs and use the spare cash to buy other quality stuff instead, like more artillery, ATGM and tank |
|
|
May 31 2014, 12:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(heavyduty @ May 31 2014, 12:29 PM) AV8 is supposed to be backbone for the 'future' malaysian army.the condor is old as shit but still workable The question is.... "Is expensive, next generation APC really necessary?"why would the MA buy something that would be obsolete once its on the ground?the AV-8 is going to be the main vehicle for the next 30-40 years the Anoa was developed out of desperation.they needed an APC that could be made quick and cheap,doesnt care if its shit can something like the anoa provide a cheap solution to the condor?yes for the immediate future.is it any better than the condor?no TNI wants to establish more motorized units,thus it can be understandable for them to use the Anoa.the MA is trying to move forward to a new phase of fighting capability,the cheap Anoa is not what they need btw,as a vehicle commander the notion that IFVs are disposable is Anoa could already protect troops from small arms fire/shrapnel, provide basic fire support and feature BMS for command versions for $800,000. Those are basic requirements of APCs. Would AV8 really make difference in battlefield, compared if Malaysian Army uses APCs based on simpler designs? Especially when facing infantry units equipped with light ATGM like NLAW? ![]() This post has been edited by Frozen_Sun: May 31 2014, 12:53 PM |
|
|
May 31 2014, 02:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(heavyduty @ May 31 2014, 01:01 PM) if the AV8 provides better protection,better fire support and better C&C then yes How much better protection, fire support and C&C AV8 will have? Do they worth the high cost? the presence of ATGMs doesnt mean APCs need to be fodder.tanks are just as susceptible to anti armour fire why provide soldiers with body armour,helmets and NODs while snipers could take them out? |
|
|
May 31 2014, 08:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ May 31 2014, 03:39 PM) that depend on how you look at it. Any prediction, how much each unit of AV8 will actually cost, excluding R&D and infrastructure costs. Let's say the there will be 2nd batch production.I will write down the main spec. Armor It will 360° protection against 12.7mm caliber ap round. AV8 C4ISR systems - Thales HF and VHF radio communications system - STE OICS - Thales VSys-net optronics - Thales Catherine XP, DNGS TI and Sophie TAS/C Variant Surveillance - Rheinmetall Vingtaqs II (€36mil for development, intergration, documentation, training and equipment) 24unit Two men turrets, atgm, rws - denel G130, G130+Ingwe atgm system, denel rws (€340mil include intergration, development, documentation, training and atgm missile) 178units. There are still a few more varianta not much news I have on its. |
|
|
Jun 1 2014, 01:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ May 31 2014, 10:00 PM) We'll never know until deftech start the production of these machines I think AV8 in its full-feature version will cost nearly $5 million. Belgium purchased 242 Piranha III for $1 billion in 2005, or around $4 million each. Stryker costs $5 million each; so this is the proper price for next-generation APCsBut in terms of estimation, a baseline pure apc FNSS Pars 8x8 "long-wheelbase version" (without weapons) would cost $800,000, so go figure Malaysian 8x8 evaluation phase ![]() From left to right, APC PIRANHA III - $1,200,000 PARS 8X8 - $1,000,000 ROSOMAK - $2,900,000 |
|
|
Jun 2 2014, 08:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(Nannostomuss @ Jun 2 2014, 01:32 AM) Indonesia is definitely not in a position to execute an incursion on foreign soil. Yes, they are on shopping spree but the quantity is way inadequate to protect their territories. Their military in general couldnt even form an effective expeditionary force which requires a sizable airlift and sea lift to different part of the region within shortest possible notice. Luckily, like 191 member nations across the world which are under the umbrella of United Nation, emphasis on economy, wide spread social media for sympathy. Otherwise, Singapore would have shot down all their planes and sank their fleet and taking Riau Peninsula from the Indonesian. Actually, Indonesia has an aspiration to become the strongest militarily in the region, even outgunning Australia. Although, may never be as strong as China and India.Anyway big country is not invincible. History has proven, when JPN annihilated the Chinese air power and raped Chinese cities apart. The Chinese do not have the capability to resist simply because naval power was like almost from little to none and they possessed limited air power. If SG decided to whack Indonesia for some apparent reasons, Indonesia will probably be experiencing what the Chinese experienced in WW2. Personally i think its unlike to happen. According to Citigroup projection, Indonesia will become 4th largest economy in 2050. Other financial organizations have varying projections, but the lowest rank is 6th position in 2050. Year 2050 (in billion) China 205,321 India 180,490 United States 83,805 Indonesia 45,901 If it maintains 0.8% GDP for defense budget...equal to $360 billion. Some people could be somewhat skeptical about this, but if someone prophesied in 1998 that Indonesia will become the 10th largest economy in 16 years according to World Bank, everyone would roll on floor laughing out loud. But, it happens. |
|
|
Jun 2 2014, 07:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(hecklaine @ Jun 2 2014, 03:32 PM) invade who? msia? no lar, msia and singapore is important for indon economy, and indon govt now taking economy seriously Prabowo, the former special forces commander is likely the one. The latest Tanjung Datu incident just bring more support to him.......just hope next indon leader is not someone crazy ultranationalist leader ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Jun 3 2014, 10:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
|
|
|
Jun 3 2014, 10:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Jun 3 2014, 10:35 AM) Erieye is always the most sensible....but it doesn't have full 360-scanning coverage. Too bad Russian doesn't have something similar to Hawkeye or Elta's rotodome radar. Would be nice if Russian's lightweight AEW platform can be datalinked with Flankers family. |
|
|
Jun 3 2014, 12:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Jun 3 2014, 11:12 AM) I read on a magazine two years ago they are updating the radar improve coverage to 360° and reduce some of its blind spot. Should be no problem if the Erieye makes 360-degree turn every 5 minutes, as long as one of its main radar lobes is pointed on most probable enemy approach routesPerhaps it still under development. |
|
|
Jun 3 2014, 12:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Jun 3 2014, 12:10 PM) Iirc they are adding more cell module into the radar hence increase in coverage and reduce in blind spot. radar module/emitter should be placed on the front of main radar assembly for forward scanning and on the aircraft's tail for rearward scanningThey even will upgrade several thing like the mission computer, ew and so on. |
|
|
Jun 4 2014, 11:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
Indonesia will have at least a total of 18 mechanized infantry battalions based on Anoa APC...out of 100 infantry battalions in TNI-AD. There are currently 3 in Kodam Jaya (Jakarta), three are being converted in Kodam Brawijaya (East Java)...that will require nearly 1000 Anoa, about USD 800 million total.
http://www.antaranews.com/berita/437162/tn...s-di-tiap-kodam ![]() Current mechanized units are based on 200 AMX VCI ![]() Other variants ![]() ![]() Mortar carrier ![]() ![]() ![]() This post has been edited by Frozen_Sun: Jun 4 2014, 12:44 PM |
|
|
Jun 4 2014, 07:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
Amphibious armor assault in Latihan Gabungan 2014
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Jun 4 2014, 07:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
Heliborne assault, with locally-built Bell 412
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Jun 4 2014, 07:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
Anoa in action
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Jun 5 2014, 02:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
Airborne and heliborne operation in Latihan Gabungan 2014
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() This post has been edited by Frozen_Sun: Jun 5 2014, 02:06 PM |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0264sec
0.44
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 07:54 AM |