Is it true that in world war, cameraman was not allowed to be shot?
World War I in Photos : 100 years ago
|
|
 Apr 28 2014, 11:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
20 posts Joined: Mar 2013 From: That special place in your heart :3   
|
|
Quote|
|
Apr 28 2014, 11:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
20 posts Joined: Mar 2013 From: That special place in your heart :3
|
QUOTE(Scar_face @ Apr 28 2014, 11:12 AM) not only in world war, i think any war also cant..reporter, cameraman and volunteer (red cross, mercy etc) are forbidden to be shot But they still kena the damages right? Like the armies can see which one is which one. |
|
|
Apr 28 2014, 11:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
20 posts Joined: Mar 2013 From: That special place in your heart :3
|
QUOTE(Ancient-XinG- @ Apr 28 2014, 11:14 AM) Most of them yes, even the paramedics are the most precious to any of the part. The take them as hostages and healing process. So the medics are suppose to assist any injured armies from any sides right since they are all neutral? |
|
|
Apr 28 2014, 11:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
20 posts Joined: Mar 2013 From: That special place in your heart :3
|
QUOTE(Ancient-XinG- @ Apr 28 2014, 11:24 AM) They are theoretically neutral. But practically not. I see. thanks for the explanation. See, team A have medics, they are under team A. Team B did the same. However, if fat boy or old man bomb coming down, team B medics dead. And they successfully captured team A medics, the jobs for the medics still the same. Is healing armies, but not team A's. Its B's.  |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: |  0.0202sec
 0.21
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 07:25 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.