QUOTE(ksl279 @ Sep 20 2006, 10:22 PM)
wif e66 ka? sure wan leh?coz as far as i know, e66 need alot voltages after touching 3.2Ghz
the most OC able in new intel family were onli the lower-end type which is e63 & e64
Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo Overclocking Board, Report your issues/results here.
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 08:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#161
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(ksl279 @ Sep 20 2006, 10:22 PM) wif e66 ka? sure wan leh?coz as far as i know, e66 need alot voltages after touching 3.2Ghz the most OC able in new intel family were onli the lower-end type which is e63 & e64 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 12:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#162
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(jarofclay @ Sep 21 2006, 08:59 AM) E6300 & 6400 are most overclockable because they start from low speed from the beginning, so it's not surprising. Moreover, the chip has less L2, so that helps as well. yess, u rite. back to the principle of overclocking here where the low multiplier, the more its overclock able |
|
|
Sep 22 2006, 09:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#163
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 25 2006, 08:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#164
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 25 2006, 10:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#165
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 25 2006, 10:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#166
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 08:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#167
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 28 2006, 11:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#168
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(Bliz @ Sep 28 2006, 10:09 AM) Actually the current top P965 board OC even better than 975x mobo, so i can't see why u would like to spend extra for 975x board unless u going for crossfire setup u correct but, he wanna get those 975X becoz it support the quad-core kensfield i believe QUOTE(irenic @ Sep 28 2006, 10:45 AM) u correct oso, average for 975X hit the wall at 385FSB, might solve prob wif latest BIOS in future |
|
|
Sep 28 2006, 11:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#169
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 12:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#170
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 12:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#171
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 04:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#172
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 05:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#173
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 08:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#174
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 09:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#175
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 10:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#176
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(Bliz @ Sep 29 2006, 09:54 PM) What kind of temperature u getting? Looks like i might have temperature problem with my future xp90c also i dont have prob wif my previous e6300my e6600 load around 78c wif failed orthos stress havent test current setup but atleast it manage to stable during dualie Super PI 32mb calculation This post has been edited by gengstapo: Sep 29 2006, 10:16 PM |
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 10:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#177
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(irenic @ Sep 29 2006, 10:54 PM) @geng: yeahh. i knew it. oledi run 2 times dualie super pi 32mb but when comes to orthos, imediately failed dual pi 32m doesnt mean anything :-" my e6600 last time manage to do 3.5 dual pi 32m but then failed orthos after 10secs.. and what vcore r u using for ur e6600? i know cpuz is not correct i put AUTO at the vcore |
|
|
Oct 1 2006, 07:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#178
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Oct 2 2006, 12:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#179
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Oct 2 2006, 12:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#180
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
so high temp meh?? even using xp90c
my current e6600 running at stock vcore as my siggy there temp less than 80c(2hrs ++ running orthos) |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0536sec
0.30
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 08:39 PM |