QUOTE(Kar Weng @ Apr 9 2014, 01:29 AM)
Hello everyone I'm new here (just registered on Lowyat.NET in fact), so pardon me for my ignorance especially with the forum's unspoken rules.
I've gone through Starting Strength for awhile back then (before doing SS, I was just like every other clueless but passionate biceps-curling guys in the gym for about a year
), and I'm now training on my own 4days-split (Deadlift, Squat, Bench Press and Press are the main focuses on each day).
This is what I heard:
1) If you have more muscles, it's easier for you to lose fat due to the higher BMR (as a result of having more lean mass)
2) If you bulk from a lower BF %, the mass you gain has more quality (as in gaining more muscles and less fat on a caloric surplus) compared to bulking from a higher BF % (I'm not sure how true is no.2)
3) To have a good physique in the long run I need to have a good foundation of strength
3 of these theories aren't contradicting with each other by themselves of course. However, it makes it hard for me to decide whether or not to continue bulking.
I'm currently still pursuing for more weights on the bar(refer to no.3), so naturally it should make sense for me to be in a caloric surplus. The problem now is that my BF % has obviously increased throughout these periods of strength training, especially visible on the belly (I started out skinny fat 40kg and have never seen my abs before).
I am 55.5kg (or a little higher since I've not been measuring for awhile) now, with very tiny girly bone frame.
These are my current main lifting numbers (5rep max)
Deadlift - 102.5kg
Squat - 72.5kg
Bench Press - 50kg
Overhead Press - 38.5kg
So my question is, should I just continue what I'm doing until I have a certain level of size and strength? Or is no.2 true and I should lower my BF % 1st to gain quality mass? It'd be hard for me to increase/maintain my lifts if I'm in a caloric deficit state. Tell me your opinion and what you think about the 3 rules I mentioned above.
40kg, skinny fat. I can only imagine you as tall as 155cm. What's your height?I've gone through Starting Strength for awhile back then (before doing SS, I was just like every other clueless but passionate biceps-curling guys in the gym for about a year
This is what I heard:
1) If you have more muscles, it's easier for you to lose fat due to the higher BMR (as a result of having more lean mass)
2) If you bulk from a lower BF %, the mass you gain has more quality (as in gaining more muscles and less fat on a caloric surplus) compared to bulking from a higher BF % (I'm not sure how true is no.2)
3) To have a good physique in the long run I need to have a good foundation of strength
3 of these theories aren't contradicting with each other by themselves of course. However, it makes it hard for me to decide whether or not to continue bulking.
I'm currently still pursuing for more weights on the bar(refer to no.3), so naturally it should make sense for me to be in a caloric surplus. The problem now is that my BF % has obviously increased throughout these periods of strength training, especially visible on the belly (I started out skinny fat 40kg and have never seen my abs before).
I am 55.5kg (or a little higher since I've not been measuring for awhile) now, with very tiny girly bone frame.
These are my current main lifting numbers (5rep max)
Deadlift - 102.5kg
Squat - 72.5kg
Bench Press - 50kg
Overhead Press - 38.5kg
So my question is, should I just continue what I'm doing until I have a certain level of size and strength? Or is no.2 true and I should lower my BF % 1st to gain quality mass? It'd be hard for me to increase/maintain my lifts if I'm in a caloric deficit state. Tell me your opinion and what you think about the 3 rules I mentioned above.
Apr 9 2014, 09:09 AM

Quote
0.0222sec
0.55
7 queries
GZIP Disabled