another suggestion here... jz my 2cent

how abt do the vote for each forumer? but the rate only able to view by ourself, similiar like warn level...

if the forumer really contributing to LYN, highly vote for BEST, perhaps give some awards and encourage other forumer to contribute; if the forumer talking craps, highly vote for WORST, perhaps give some punishment (ban? whatever...), at least wont waisted the server's resources for useless reply...

u have the point there too...

if the WORST forumer intended have real contribution after "spamming" in LYN, but his visible reputation level is 0% tat time and cant recover back in the shortest time... sound like not fair and all the forumers ignore him as well... perhaps moderator can reset his reputation from 0% back to 50% if the forumer really start to contribute... i forward my thinking only... can ignore my post if not relevant...

hm... lets say if there have good threads, highly recommend for further discussion... but spam by useless crap post...

furthmore if the topic is worth for discussion, i believe tat topic will keep bumping all the time, so i think dont have the purpose to rate for the thread... good thread, alive forever; bad thread, will phase out by itself...

This post has been edited by gkl83: Jul 27 2006, 02:13 PM