Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.24, WE love spiders

views
     
jchue73
post Aug 9 2014, 02:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Aug 9 2014, 02:26 AM)
woah then hw many lenses u gt ??
*
I have some. tongue.gif

QUOTE(ragnarokB2 @ Aug 9 2014, 03:10 AM)
Indeed AF-S -es  are often the bang of the buck, but the value is nothing if you can't afford to have one. Having cheaper lenses will allow me to slowly step into various kinds of photography. I'm also a noobie user, only had a DSLR for about a year.  whistling.gif
Talk about resale value, I noticed vintage MF are priced rather high for their functions. Got the 50mm 1.8 E series which is 100% manual and the metallic feel and smoothness are just irresistible that I decided to keep it instead of swapping to AF-D for the same (or lower) price. thumbup.gif
*
Yes, nowadays the newer lenses are all plastic. Gone are the ones with metal built crinkle finish like a tank.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


But to think about it, the change to the current plastic is all about weight savings.

QUOTE(copperwire93 @ Aug 9 2014, 09:32 AM)
I'm curious how much difference in terms of image quality between AF-D and AF-S.

If I have a D7000, I would buy the AF-D if the difference is not that much because of the cheaper price.

Those lenses are hard to find, the most common lens you can find in the market, is the prime 50mm. 28-70mm still expensive too.
*
When it comes to macro, the performance between AF-D and AF-S is closer because usually they are stopped down a lot. But usually on a high density sensor like the D7000, the imperfections of the AF-D lenses will show. Sometimes desirable, sometimes not.

On another note, when getting the old AF-S 28-70mm f/2.8, you need to be careful with the AF-S motor. They 1st batch ones easily fail after years of usage.

QUOTE(pugger79 @ Aug 9 2014, 11:18 AM)
During my early canon days the 17-55 f2.8 IS was a vacuum cleaner. Sucks in dust like no tomorrow. Sent it in for free cleaning at canon subang.
*
I think the other lens that sucks dust is the Canon 100-400mm. Same design like the Nikon AF-D 80-200mm f/2.8 push pull 1st gen lens.

I find in terms of service, Canon is heaps better. When I started out, Nikon SC did simple service such as sensor cleaning for free ! Beat that. After that, FOC only applies to DSLRs within the 1st year warranty. Now every thing will be charged. sad.gif

Oh, the only thing good about Nikon SC is that they honour the international warranty of lenses unlike Canon where there's no such thing as international warranty for lenses.

QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Aug 9 2014, 12:29 PM)
I see. Where did you send? All my lens are nikon and consider to do clc also as the lens feels like rough. Just feel wanna to put some wd 40 inside xD
Rreally? Haha. I dont have any bravery to suck using vacuun cleaner. The dust are visible AFTER my warranty period is over. sleep.gif
*
I think what pugger79 meant was the lens sucks dust like a vacuum cleaner. Not use a vacuum cleaner to suck dust from the lens. sweat.gif

The lube inside the lens is a very special light grease if I'm not mistaken. Something like WD40 is very corrosive on plastics and rubber O rings.
jchue73
post Oct 23 2014, 05:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Oct 12 2014, 12:40 PM)
What a bad day.
My D700 CF Card compartment went kaputt already. The messages shows at top lcd was CHA error.

Asked Nikon and get quoted for RM 1,400 to service because to change the "whole board".

I did not hand it to them yet, but is there any other shops recommended to have my D700 get serviced ?
I know Shashinki, will be calling them later. Just want to look for cheaper alternatives. cry.gif
*
A bit late I think... Nikon will quote you the worst case scenario without inspecting the camero body which is to replace the whole board.

But most of the time, these errors are related to some FPC (Flexible Printed Circuit) coming off loose or just needs replacing.

I believe the shops I know that can open a DSLR and make diagnosis are shops like J-One at Amcorp Mall and YL Camera in Pudu.

A friend of mine did recommend Cheah Camera Repair at Mutiara Complex at Jalan Ipoh. Read that kldslr.com also does camera repair.

Good luck.
jchue73
post Dec 5 2014, 05:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
Came back from holiday and now my Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 needs to go to hospital for a check up on the stiff zoom ring. Very hard to turn especially from 50mm to 70mm.

Has anybody experienced this problem? Any idea what would be the repair cost? Thanks.
jchue73
post Dec 19 2014, 01:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(@secret@ @ Dec 18 2014, 10:28 PM)
Worse than I thought. It was fungus.
Just clean it for free in bangkok. Feels alive looking through the viewfinder now  rclxms.gif
*
Nikon SC in Bangkok does this for free? shocking.gif
jchue73
post Feb 3 2015, 02:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(kimsim @ Feb 3 2015, 07:40 AM)
Share my some photos is taken from HK with D800 and Tokina  AF 17mm F/3.5 ATX
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
You shot the 2nd pic with 17mm on full frame? Must be cropped surely. biggrin.gif
jchue73
post Mar 12 2015, 06:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Mar 12 2015, 01:10 PM)
Hi all, I'm about to buy my first ever DSLR, and Nikon D750 will have the honor for that. I've researched a lot about DSLRs, but the lens part is confusing me a bit as I'm starting to learn about it. I'm about to purchase already so need your kind expertise to help me a bit about the lenses.

D750 also comes with a kit set of AF-S 24-120mm F4G ED VR lens. A friend told me to just get the body and a 50mm 1.8G for a beginner like me as it fits for all purpose, and that a prime focus lens usually produces a bit better image quality than a zoom lens. Now this kit lens retails at RM4.7k (discounted can probably get RM3.7k), but with this kit I just need to add RM2k to get it. I feel that I'll be missing a good deal if I only get the body. What is your advice? How good is this kit lens? Is the quality really as what my friend has said?

Thanks in advance. Sorry if the question seems silly.  sweat.gif
*
The kit lens is a good start and not like last time when kit lenses were mostly not so good. The 24-120mm f/4 VR is quite good for general photography.

The other question you need to ask is what type of photography would you be interested? Buying for the sake of buying just because it's a good deal does not seem wise if the lens does not suite the type of photography you're interested.

If you're into birding or wildlife, then neither the 24-120mm f/4 VR nor the 50mm f/1.8 is a good lens to have.
jchue73
post Mar 13 2015, 03:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Mar 13 2015, 08:07 AM)
I will not be a dedicate photographer as I hardly have time, it will be normal use and will be bringing it around whenever I travel/vacations or for functions. I just love photography and appreciate good images.
*
Good for you then. rclxms.gif The kit lens is indeed very sufficient for general photography from wide 24mm to medium tele 120mm with VR to boot. Don't hear many people using the excuse of a getting the FX DSLR because they appreciate good photos. Most people will take the simple route and go for PnS or Mirrorless.

I say slowly but surely you'll come back here to get more photography gear poison. laugh.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0492sec    0.60    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 06:50 AM