Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMDŽ Socket-AM2 Overclocking thread, discuss our setup/overclocking issues

views
     
lohwenli
post Feb 23 2007, 08:04 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


Has anyone had any problems with the 2.2vDimm jumper on this board? For some reason it only locks it at 2.0v, not 2.2v like its supposed to. Really sad la, since most DDR2 can easilt survive up to 2.2-2.3v.

Btw, what should I google for when searching for the modded BIOS? So far I've only seen modded bios for the 754 and 939 versions, not AM2.

This post has been edited by lohwenli: Feb 23 2007, 08:07 PM
lohwenli
post Apr 24 2007, 09:08 AM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


Hasn't anyone overclocked the Winsor F3 stepping? Its supposed to be as good as brisbane, but -slightly- higher power consumption (10-20w more). And if you look at reviews of brisbane on anandtech and tom's hardware, brisbane is actually slightly slower than windsor at the same clock speed (thats why brisbanes are clocked 100MHz higher than their windsor counterparts-to make up for the slower cache).
lohwenli
post Apr 24 2007, 08:53 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(soulfly @ Apr 24 2007, 07:36 PM)
actually that is because of the 65nm process and the silicon process thingy
*
I'm not too sure about that, because the Windsor F3 also came out about the same time and overclocks very similarly. The only thing that the Brisbane has over Windsor is that the power consumption is a bit lower even though the stock voltage is the same (another puzzle-shouldn't the voltage be lower?)

I know this is a weird thing to ask (definitely off topic), but has anyone tried undervolting the brisbane core? Because if you look at C2D's voltages, its very much lower than Brisbane. Technically Brisbane -should- be able to use similar voltages, but despite a bit of googling, I haven't found a definite answer. Imagine how low would its power consumption be at 0.8v..underclocking would be required though.

Well, can't wait to see what how the new K8L architecture (or K10, as some re caling it) will perform. First OC result of ES Agena proc has been sneaked out, and it looks good drool.gif And if you read the K8L architecture overview and the Barcelona previews, you should know that it outperforms C2D when both are at the same clock speed. Only question is, will it overclock high enough to outperform a fully overclocked C2D?

Agena overclock
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=c...id=631&Itemid=1

K8L architecture (or might be K10)
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/amd-k8l.html
lohwenli
post Apr 26 2007, 09:43 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(sempronic @ Apr 26 2007, 04:07 AM)
yeah...it is opty ar... hmm.gif
just like opty before for socket 939....
as we know....opty more overclockable then other..... nod.gif
*
QUOTE(byfc2010 @ Apr 26 2007, 11:03 AM)
now isn't it for quad core?

sumone plz point out for me...biggrin.gif


Added on April 26, 2007, 11:04 amoo get it liao...

quad core server proc...lol
was so steam...
*
CPU-Z can't recognise the proc la..the proc isn't released yet. Thats why it says opteron. Note that the core name is blank. But you can see 4 cores and L3 cache meaning its definitely a K10 processor.

I've just heard rumours that the screenshot might be faked, but I've yet to find confirmation whether it is or not.


QUOTE(soulfly @ Apr 26 2007, 12:53 PM)
you should watch out the voltage rail on your icute psu... the name might be cute... but getting your rig burnt sure ain't pretty.
*
It depends, most AM2 rigs don't take up that much power. At 2.4GHz most AM2 rigs only take 150W at most excluding graphic card (which highest is 120-150W for 8800 or 7950GX2 for each card)

QUOTE(sempronic @ Apr 26 2007, 04:58 PM)
YEAH...YEAH!!!
bro soulfly....please update my OC result..... icon_rolleyes.gif

now my Windsor can go up to 3.0ghz rclxms.gif
*
Wei, your vcore damn scary for a 90nm processor..1.6v+... blink.gif
lohwenli
post Apr 26 2007, 10:46 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(-pWs- @ Apr 26 2007, 10:14 PM)
I think what soulfly meant is the voltage fluatuation.
12v, 3.3v and 5v. Not power needed. smile.gif

Overclocking need those stable of voltage to ensure stability.
Correct if i am wrong
-pWs-
*
True, though its hard to measure it for such low power consumption. Even icutes don't fluctuate much on DMM readings at that power consumption. Need a osciloscope to check for sure, but I don't have access to one nor can I buy one..can buy a C2D rig with that money..
lohwenli
post May 7 2007, 05:28 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Apr 30 2007, 01:00 AM)
i have a question ar, we all overclock kau kau...but have we ever tried to make a fanless CPU ar? Currently im testing out lower voltages at stock speed and trying to make a fanless cpu (experiment mar) anyone care to join me? =D

edit:typo
*
Oh yes you can, I can turn off my CPU fan on my 3800 x2 by undervolting the processor. 60C max on full load, stock clock. Been offline last few days, or I'd have answered sooner.

QUOTE(seveneleven @ May 3 2007, 10:21 AM)
Software reading is not accurate. Use a DMM to check certain points. I've test my tforce 754 and seems almost accurate. 0.01v off maybe due to DMM.
*
YEAH! DMM is the way to go.. Onboard system monitoring chips are (almost) all FUBAR..

QUOTE(byfc2010 @ May 3 2007, 02:37 PM)
nah dun think so...
my tforce6100's vcore is accurate...
while it's vdimm is incorrect...not much bt less...2.2v gime oni 2.03v...
haiz...can't oc my rams...
*
QUOTE(byfc2010 @ May 7 2007, 03:37 PM)
lol....the problem is set to oc jumper which suppose to gime 2.4V oso jz got 2.03V...
*
I had that problem too on my Tforce 6100. Even with the jumper its only 2.0v. Double checked with a DMM, no mistake there. Heard the Tforce 550 also suffers from the same problem. Any one else also having this problem? Very sad la, since according to datasheets most DDR2 is rated for 2.2v max (but at 60-65C max only).
lohwenli
post May 8 2007, 09:16 AM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(byfc2010 @ May 7 2007, 11:15 PM)
u oso had the problem ah...
wander y biostar can't make us hav a lil extra volt to oc our ram...
*
Yeah, it sux man..and its hard to voltmod for more without messing around with the motherboard power regulation contoller IC. Last time on DDR easy only, can just connect the 3.3v to the vDimm lines so can OC BH-5 kaw kaw. Do that now on DDR2 and you -might- see smoke coming out.
lohwenli
post May 8 2007, 04:28 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(kalakatu @ May 8 2007, 12:16 PM)
i dunno how should i say this, but i think its quite dangerous when we set the vdimm jumper to 2.4v..

i saw my vdimm was 2.48v on the posthardware..lucky..
then i changed back to the normal jumper place..
and currently my crucial can go around ddr800 (divider 667) with unchanged vdimm..

now my target is, oc until the highest 1T can make.. smile.gif
*
Well just to put things into perpective, those system monitoring chips are pretty off target. I've measured a few boards with a DMM and most of the system health readings are off target by a fair bit. So you don't know how accurate is the reading anyway.

QUOTE(treason @ May 8 2007, 04:12 PM)
yah..one thing i realized is really silly bout our board is that it cant go between 2.1v and 2.4v ..id rather have the 2.2v jumper one lar if i knew....now i wanna buy the crucial ballistix also have to think twice..coz the rated voltage is 2.2v ... shakehead.gif should have bought dfi  tongue.gif
*
FYI, most crucial ram (micron actually) have a max rating of 2.2v according to datasheets. But hell, if you feel extreme you might just say 'screw the datasheets'... notworthy.gif which most overclockers are already doing without realising it, particularly for processors.
lohwenli
post May 8 2007, 04:59 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(treason @ May 8 2007, 04:48 PM)
haha yeah and considering that the rams would be right under my tt big typhoons fan..i just might do that.....would it work at 2.1v in theory though? ive seen most reviewers say that it would at close to stock speeds but 1 or 2 have said that it wouldnt b stable...anyway..already ordered the pc6400 tracers 2x 1 gb kit..so  whistling.gif  drool.gif hope for the bestlar..hahaha
*
It might, go ahead and try; undervolting to 2.1v quite safe (default for tracers is 2.2v rite?) and if its not stable you can always change back the settings.

If I'm not mistake official JDEC DDR2 specifications don't actually call for DDR2 to operate at 1.8v but rather a bit higher (not 100% sure, malas to read through the whole DDR2 official paper). Most DDR2 manufacturers found that the chips would run equally well at specified speeds at lower voltages and lowered the voltage possibly to reduce power consumption and prolong lifespan. But I think its possible, since most ram doesn't take well to undervolting, but can overvolt pretty high without burning out; meaning the voltage is specified towards the lower end of the acceptable range-unlike processors which are usually specified to the middle and can both undervolt and overvolt, though not very far.

This post has been edited by lohwenli: May 8 2007, 05:00 PM
lohwenli
post May 9 2007, 07:39 AM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(kalakatu @ May 9 2007, 12:51 AM)
but i did use biostar before, when the 939 era..and i can say that the measurements are  exactly same with the one that i set in the bios..
so what happen with tforce am2 mobo nowadays?  sad.gif
*
Well, Tforce AM2 boards still overclock well, but there are some quirks, like those mentioned above.

About voltages, most of the time I find that the last digit (last 2 digits for vCore) of motherboard sensors not accurate. Guess you're just lucky then, your board reports accurately. Also depends on what software you use, some have been calibarated to give better readings.
lohwenli
post May 11 2007, 09:31 AM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(sempronic @ May 11 2007, 09:23 AM)
thought thier L2 cache is the same.... hmm.gif
*
The amount of cache is the same, but the cache runs slower. Google review to find out more about it.
lohwenli
post May 13 2007, 07:00 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


memtest86 is better for memory. Hell lot better, in fact. Only thing that sux is you have to reboot the whole PC (but if you're overclocking, that should be pretty common, no?).

Speedfan is also pretty good for temps, plus you can graph it. But most of the time you'll have to figure out which temp is which (they're not labeled properly) and some of the temps don't actually record anything.

jy14,
How to use memtest-burn the cd from the iso, or make the floppy/thumbdrive from the install utility. Then reboot the PC from the disk you created.

Prime95-after install, select stress test only. Then for ANY dual core processor, make a copy of the program shortcut for every core available on the processor. In each shortcut's properties, add the parameter -A*, where * is any number as long as none of the shortcuts have the same number; counting up from 0 is usual. Then start all the shortcuts, and you'll have multiple prime windows running. Set affinity (under Advanced) for each window to a seperate core. Then run the Torture Test under options. Prime tests the processor, and also the memory for the "blend" option, though memtest is still better for memory.
Alternative, use Orthos (I haven't used this much myself)

And lastly, superPI tests both memory and proc, but you have to do 32M to be certain. 1M is just too short, no processor could heat up enough to really prove its stable under even the most extreme of conditions.
lohwenli
post May 13 2007, 08:17 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(soulfly @ May 13 2007, 08:13 PM)
Use Windows-based Memtest is better and quicker.
*
mind posting the link? haven't had much luck finding it.

Also I wonder how effective is it, as windows will use a noticable chunk of memory, and that chunk will not be tested.
lohwenli
post May 13 2007, 08:30 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(soulfly @ May 13 2007, 08:20 PM)
it's very effective. you will only need to test like 25% the capacity of your total system memory.

i personally use Clockgen + Memtest to find best memory speed quickly.
*
Interesting. First time I saw it I actually took no notice because the program was so simple. Might not be good enough for a full stability check, but enough to find a rough limit for memory overclocking. Thanks.
lohwenli
post May 14 2007, 10:21 AM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


Ram will overclock differently with a different memory controller, just because the ram will reach DDR1000 on a C2D setup doesn't mean it will do the same on a AM2 setup (not that AM2 really needs that much memory bandwidth). Better if you set so that the HT link and DDR are NOT overclocked at all while you overclock your processor. Trust me, it'll save you a lot of headache later when you try to figure out whats holding your overclock back. In any case its pretty much guaranteed that anything will run stable when its running below default, so you can also go easier on stress testing (only test what you're overclocking).

Generally,

Processor will be stable if the voltage is at or above default while running at stock speed or slower. Ditto for HT link.

Memory will be stable if the voltage is at or above default while running at stock speed or slower with default or looser timings.

There are a few exceptions, but very rare. Mostly on very specific pieces of hardware only (typically memory).
lohwenli
post May 15 2007, 12:19 AM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(sempronic @ May 14 2007, 06:45 PM)
thats why try update the bios....maybe it change the vcore value....
*
possible, though unlikely. Sometimes processor micro-code updates are put together with bios updates.

QUOTE(soulfly @ May 14 2007, 11:02 PM)
One thing I dislike about Biostar... minimum Vdimm is 1.95V shakehead.gif
*
Hmm, for the Tforce 6100 AM2 its 1.85v.
lohwenli
post May 16 2007, 08:06 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(soulfly @ May 16 2007, 05:31 PM)
ditched my Infinity nF-M2
now using nF-M2 nview brows.gif

model name almost the same... how ironic
*
Yeah! Another NF-M2 nview user. I'm almost ready to overclock mine, just a few last things to get out of the way. Been very busy since I got it, no time to really play with it cry.gif

Soulfly, hope you can figure out how to get past the 250HTT barrier. It can clock quite high using clockgen (300+++, which some other people have managed also), but if I OC from bios it will not boot past 250-253. Then again, I haven't had time to really play with it..scarcely even started exploring the voltage and timing options..

This post has been edited by lohwenli: May 16 2007, 08:14 PM
lohwenli
post May 18 2007, 09:50 AM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(soulfly @ May 17 2007, 08:02 PM)
user posted image

brows.gif
*
Not bad at all. Did it manage to boot at that settings? What settings did you change in BIOS?

I managed almost 330HTT from windows(clockgen) without touching any voltage or timing. But somehow when i did above 250HTT it wouldn't boot. Will try again using a seperate boot hdd so don't run the risk of screwing up my data. First time when I overclocked my AM2 set, I forgot to drop the HT link multiplier and my whole HDD screwed up. Lucky managed to recover the data and send the disk to RMA. So now I avoid overclocking while using my main disk containing all my precious data. After confirm stable only I put back my hdd.
lohwenli
post May 18 2007, 10:41 AM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(soulfly @ May 18 2007, 09:47 AM)
I set 1.50V from the BIOS... but it seems that the board overvoltages a little bit around 0.025~0.03V.

Burn in was only done when I was using my DFI.
*
I will check the voltage myself with a digital multimeter. I don't trust onboard system monitoring sensors especially for voltage.
lohwenli
post May 20 2007, 06:07 PM

Penang Overclockers Club
*****
Senior Member
971 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(CV6149 @ May 20 2007, 12:16 AM)
just some news to Abit KN9 family board.

recently ive received a lot of blue screen.Fedup of it.i unOC the cpu.
still BSOD..after some hard thinking.seems like there is some issue with Silent OTES.Crap design!!........the NB heatsink is too blardy hot!!i cant even survive 3sec touching test..

so i retrofit a small fan on top of the heatsink.temp down like heaven and earth..
no more BSOD.and im back at super clock....... rclxms.gif
*
Pull off the bloody silent OTES, rip off the bubblegum and put some real thermal paste there. Thats one thing Abit f***ed up badly.

And yeah, its SILENT otes-no fans. Case ventilation must be good lar...

QUOTE(allenultra @ May 20 2007, 12:35 PM)
u won't feel much heat from a brisbane core.

For ur rig, the only concern if u want to oc is the power supply.
Not a good PSU though.
*
Not really, the extreme power 430W is actually reliable
http://www.jonnyguru.com/PSU/eXtremePower430W/

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0237sec    0.46    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 09:39 PM