maybe neither one? for all we know you could be hired by u-fun-troll LTD, which is one of the countless organisations setup with the u-fun name in it by those behind the scheme so they can later deny that it belongs to them when it gets busted later?

nah, already confirmed that you're just one of those who invested and trying to recoup your investments before the entire thing goes legs up.

Its already in the news that:
- Bina Puri lodged a police report that they had not allowed u-fun to make use of their brand name and logo
- Property in the Bangkok Marina invested by whichever organization in the u-fun group has been seized.

so its already done and done, and going further still as they investigate into it more.

After all, not even the so called founder of u-fun dared to make a public press conference on this to confirm that u-fun store is nothing to do with u-fun group, its only the small fries making such statements. Better yet, the founder of u-fun group does not even dare make a public appearance, but only dare to release a video on youtube.

So much for reputation hmm?

ahh.. so you're an investor looking to make even more money as fast as possible before the entire thing goes legs up, by hoping others would join, even though they are the ones who're the most likely to lose money

Oh really? if his lawyers asked him to shut up, then where did the news that u-fun store is nothing to do with the u-fun group at all come from? must be speculation too right? OMG you're also speculating!!

fact is, there's no official confirmation from u-fun group either that u-fun store is just some entity using their name without permission at all. its just people like you speculating that this is the case right?

On the video said it he is taking advice from his lawyer.Oh yes you are the investigator

challenge accepted! By your constant effort to portray that all is well with the u-fun group despite the fact that there's so many things with your allegations that do not make sense, you're indirectly attempting to portray to the general public (take note that this is a public forum viewable to all, not just those posting in here) and therefore attempt to influence those who are new to this to perhaps invest in a ponzi type scheme for the purpose of making more money for those who are already deep into it, before it goes legs up.

there you go 

so you admit that your big boss himself also never confirmed that u-fun store has nothing to do with u-fun group right? so you're only speculating that u-fun store has nothing to do with u-fun group right?

which means you're spreading unconfirmed rumours based on mere speculation that u-fun store has nothing to do with u-fun group right? 

so which part of what you say makes sense either?

you claimed that u-fun store has nothing to do with u-fun group. but you admitted that there is no such confirmation from u-fun group on this either. even your big boss refuse to confirm. so this is speculation too.

This is the one and only major point that you have brought up in your attempt to say that u-fun group is not in trouble, but you had scuttled your own argument by confirming that its only mere speculation.
like I said: By your constant effort to portray that all is well with the u-fun group despite the fact that there's so many things with your allegations that do not make sense, you're indirectly attempting to portray to the general public (take note that this is a public forum viewable to all, not just those posting in here) and therefore attempt to influence those who are new to this to perhaps invest in a ponzi type scheme for the purpose of making more money for those who are already deep into it, before it goes legs up.

so which part of what you say makes sense either?

you claimed that u-fun store has nothing to do with u-fun group. but you admitted that there is no such confirmation from u-fun group on this either. even your big boss refuse to confirm. so this is speculation too.

This is the one and only major point that you have brought up in your attempt to say that u-fun group is not in trouble, but you had scuttled your own argument by confirming that its only mere speculation.
like I said: By your constant effort to portray that all is well with the u-fun group despite the fact that there's so many things with your allegations that do not make sense, you're indirectly attempting to portray to the general public (take note that this is a public forum viewable to all, not just those posting in here) and therefore attempt to influence those who are new to this to perhaps invest in a ponzi type scheme for the purpose of making more money for those who are already deep into it, before it goes legs up.

ah, so this guy confirmed that he's paying to troll, instead of being paid to do so.

it means companies like Ufun going to open office in China may be just like another Genneva Gold.
google genneva gold if you don't know about it....

if these can be wrong...what else MIGHT be wrong?...the lists of addresses to start with?

are you one of the founding fathers of this UFUN?
Else how do you know all the above?...speculating?

I might be wrong...pardon me if I am...
It seems that there is more than 1 person using your rexlucky to response/post.
noticed that the way the post was composed or what was posted in page 16 post 311 and in page 17 is way different from what was written this morning....

oh no, but your replies and evasive behaviour implies that they're in trouble 
so you admit that the news that u-fun group and u-fun store are totally different is just unconfirmed speculation, where even u-fun group itself does not dare to make an official statement, but is just merely rumours? 

well, managed to get confirmation from him that the claims that the u-fun store that got raided in Bangkok is nothing to do with u-fun group is not an official statement from u-fun, but just mere speculations spread around by those who had invested money into it.

lol of course you're stupid

btw, how much tokens you bought? what can you do with the tokens?

a guarantee is where there is bank negara backing and approval. and usually in approving, the company need to have minimum 40mil in their paid up capital, stringent process and guidelines, open and transparent, etc.

just like how public listed company shares do. sure it has risks, as the company can tutup kedai, but you can analyze and know what this company do, where he invests, and potential growth in the industry.

u fun group, apa lu dapat? prospectus apa apa also tarak. go blindly  give money?

barter trade? online currency? lol. 

lol another red herring. avoiding the questions.

sendiri sohem buy stupid non existent tokens, get angry pulak 

when the company decides to bungkus and lari, there's nothing you can dooooo 

the addresses listed is NOT accurate....
previous posts already hightlighted....go refer back previous postings.

why the big bosses chickened out and cabut?

i the video he can say he is xxxxxxx...do you believes?