3Dmark database category is no more relevant?, need volunteers for 3dm05/3dm06
|
|
 Jul 17 2006, 01:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei 
|
I reckon we do it like XS.. a hugeeeeeeeeeeeee long list. No need to segment it.
That way we can still tell how well we do in comparison with peers having the same card...same level of cards and with higher end ones. Of course, must state VGA and CPU clocks and whether it's single, dual or quad vgas. This post has been edited by sniper on the roof: Jul 17 2006, 01:32 PM |
|
|
Jul 17 2006, 11:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei
|
QUOTE(zeustronic @ Jul 17 2006, 09:54 PM) PCIE: High end, Mid end, Low End... Yeah...if you don't crack it..then you can submit ler.AGP: High end, Mid end, Low End... screen shot 3DMarks will do, i hope.... coz some demo version kenot submit scores, no money buy retail version...  QUOTE(mADmAN @ Jul 17 2006, 10:52 PM) those demo version that cant submit ORB has probably been hacked... Why split into PCI-E/AGP..how about PCI?if u download the demo version from futuremark and just install it as it is then it wont be a problem n i agree with the PCIE/AGP low,mid,high end classifications The whole reason for a listing is to compare dongs wat right....so doesn't matter lar...satu long list cukup lar..lets say Top 100... Can still brag about the top scores for sayyy.... a Ti-4200 or something like that. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0394sec
 0.66
 8 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 09:29 AM |
Quote