The thing i find good about Sime darby is this... you know how most developers will incorporate a new company to do each development so as to limit their liability ie. you can wind up that company but you can't touch the shareholders... I asked the lawyer for the Elmina SPA, the developer which signs the SPA is actually the developer who owns all the land in Elmina (i was told this by lawyer). This goes to show that SDP for elmina is so confident of their ability to deliver the project they put their "mother" company in the front. They won't risk their reputation and future development.

Goes to show the SD elmina are very confident they can deliver, which is assuring for the buyers. Of course SD elmina is a subsid of the listed company. BUt if that subsid owns the rest of the undeveloped land (thousands of acres), this is reassuring.

Go after their branding lo.... they have a reputation to protect. But i think RSK type, their margins are very small (if any) and they could be doing it as social service (forced to). However in general, the construction industry is facing a serious shortage of workers and the costs of workers has jumped a lot. Thus maybe the sub-cons cant get workers to fix the problem without losing money. Don't give up, keep chasing developer.