Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V11, #Condolences9MMRO :(

views
     
thpace
post Mar 15 2014, 01:40 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(lulz @ Mar 14 2014, 10:52 PM)
I too love tunguska, but after this video though, i know everything cant be perfect and maintained 100% good, still..
Malaysia should start with mid range sam like buk, could buy a lot and good reach but not that very expensive prime target. Not sure what are the us/euro counterpart. Patriot or Aster  maybe.
*
Malaysia have the tendency not to purchase items that already in service or in procurement process in neighboring country

so aster can consider out, even the navy didn't not plan to use Aster in their new vessel. Patriot abit susah, uncle sam still didnt trust us to such extent

best is russian sam or china.. but china also low in list laugh.gif
thpace
post Mar 15 2014, 06:18 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 15 2014, 07:14 AM)
Imo, camm is worth looking at.
Besides camm naval variant would be a good replacement for our lekiu class sam.

Other system I would look at would be iris-t sl
Meads semm gooding to couple with our madge sociii.

Pantsir and Tunguska M1 not bad.
I would to see tunguska weapons install on av8. tongue.gif
*
Pantsir look like a good choice since it much more mobile, but i would see it as an intern solution or to replace our jernas rather than strengthening our air defense

The army should get a proper and much capable SAM system laugh.gif

like the patriot or s300 system. icon_rolleyes.gif


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Mar 15 2014, 04:51 PM)
hijack is pretty certain by now
i do wonder which terrorist want to hijack a MAS flight?
or is this bigger than that? involve a bigger nation?
*
no organization have claim responsibility thus far, plus have to find where the hell the plane is currently
But it rather embarrassing, that our ministry have been changing statements since day 1.
wink.gif doh.gif
thpace
post Mar 16 2014, 11:42 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(maryjane9996 @ Mar 16 2014, 11:29 PM)
The jernas really expensive to maintain..and during our uav firing last year with the army,their radar locking system weren't working.. And no of serviceable jernas is really low.
*
itzit? Then i guess malaysia sam system can really throw ad laugh.gif since jernas is the main air defense system currently used in Malaysia apart from interceptor jets

should get s300 or s400 system then. Missile are sealed and life span of 15 years brows.gif
thpace
post Mar 17 2014, 12:06 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(nikita zuleica @ Mar 16 2014, 11:17 PM)
Malaysia’s military failed in their duty says expert
*
my personal opinion is that
The military dont want to reveal their secret radar system to others especially neighboring country but forced to now after the whole fiasco by MOD

on the incompetent. crew again this is my theory

military radar normally target abnormal movement such as super high speed, or suspicious maneuvers by small flying object. For a commercial jet it a big radar target, something the radar operator see almost everyday nothing suspicious unless notified to search for a specific target

The problem i suspect here is that, the air traffic controller and military radar operator are not in sync. When the plane lost contact, the air traffic controller fail to inform immediately to the RMAF to cross check with their radar.

If they are not informed, they would not cross check with their radar since commercial jet is nothing to be suspicious of. Though they should be competent enough to notice sudden flight part laugh.gif

so both are at fault
thpace
post Mar 17 2014, 12:31 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Mar 17 2014, 12:22 AM)
you are correct
problem with these public media is that they don't know how military works

and there's some articles i saw on internet that said some military like India didn't even switched on some of their radars..they only activate it when ordered to..reason for that is money..they say to switched the radar on all the time cost too much money and only big-spending nation like US, Russia are able to do that..don't know if these are true..

also, some news/forum say we lack modern 3D radar..we dun have 3D radar?  blink.gif
i don't know much about that..our armed forces are pretty secretive in these things..but we know they done all their best..
*
It on most of the time but it not like those radar used in US or russia. Those are big and very sophisticated and can identify a variety of target laugh.gif

i believe malaysia one is located at certain strategic place only, thus explaining the limited coverage
but since the radar data will be release, so most country will know our radar capabilities soon rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by thpace: Mar 17 2014, 12:31 AM
thpace
post Mar 17 2014, 12:47 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(wanvadder @ Mar 17 2014, 12:47 AM)
They claim our air force is incompetent but, 13 years ago, some towelheads grabbed control of their plane, rammed it into some towers, making it crash and burn, and what did the world most trained, most sophisticated air force did?

Not a goddamn thing.

These kind of thing, it tends to happen with little to no notice, and it is difficult to anticipate.
*
if u read the official detail investigation

The air force immediately scramble jet to intercept the plane after atc contact they lost communication, iinm, within 20 minutes jet are deployed to see what happen. They are within close proximity with the jets in less than hour

But their one issues, the passenger in the jet are american, and the military have to decide to shot down or let it fly? not very easy thing to do, military are not allowed to kill American civilian. So they was there following the jet until they ram the tower while top brass decide what to do sweat.gif

So in american case, their SOP and interception have no issues, the top brass decision making

Malaysia in other hand look like have both laugh.gif


QUOTE(cleaner @ Mar 17 2014, 12:25 PM)
how about vera E, is it switch on during training / hostile threat only or 24 hours non stop
*
that is classified military equipments, we dont even know where it location. could be at Johor out of range or could be within range, we also dunno

Plus, it not a tracking system like the one used in radar whistling.gif


thpace
post Mar 17 2014, 11:51 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(HuorEarfalas @ Mar 17 2014, 09:27 PM)
by reading ur post, this is what i understand:

1. The military radar does not display flight numbers nor flight details like they do on an ATC screen.

2. The MH370 blip the military saw on their radar screen appeared like any other normal flights, so they wouldn't have known any abnormalies.

Correct?

So my next question is, how does military know if the blip they see on their screens is a threat?
*
The most common, is irregular fly route. Most commercial got a set of predefined route or points they have to fly through

Unidentified object if have this signature, can be classified as threat

In case of MS370, it follow all the points as in any commercial including the turn back. The military see no suspicious as standard turn back procedure plus Dca didnt inform any critical information to them

Any in typical malaysia style, kalau tak ada masalah buat apa check laugh.gif
Basically both party is at fault, DCA fail to inform the military promptly and the military fail to take initiative to check unidentified object in their radar

QUOTE(keown83 @ Mar 17 2014, 09:51 PM)
they shud tell the same to the US airforce that failed in their duty to detect & reacted swiftly towards 2 commercial planes that hit WTC
*
detected, they even scramble jet that are not armed in mission to shoot down one of the hijacked aircraft

iinm, within 20min they lost contact, atc straight contact the air force of possible hijack. Malaysia case, no inform, military no take action

QUOTE(pikachu01 @ Mar 17 2014, 10:55 PM)
According to some posters, the military radar had ATR databases (probably a database of how a reflected radar signal can be translated to aircraft size/shape) that can positively identify the type of aircraft.
*
It just give it as 777, does not mention where it flying, what passenger it holding etc etc. All that information is under DCA

Let say in a military scenario, you see the enemy fighter jet, the most u want to know as an officer is what jet it is and it current position. Do u need to know where it heading?

chances it going to bomb something aint i right?

unless it a military threat, the air force have no reason to respond unless informed by an emergency etc

thpace
post Mar 18 2014, 12:39 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(hack3line @ Mar 18 2014, 12:25 AM)
saya ingin melaporkan US Navy sudah sampai di Subang airbase..

gambar U.S. Navy P-8 Poseidon and P-3 Orion @ Subang Air Base pagi tadi, dekat je dengan tempat aku tinggal sekarang ni dalam misi cari MH370
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
how nice if we could own one.. but mimpi hanya kekal mimpi sahaja di malaysia unless ada $$$

QUOTE(HuorEarfalas @ Mar 18 2014, 12:33 AM)
As you said, the hijacked (or not) MH370 followed the turn back procedure, and therefore military was unable to confirm an unidentified threat and took it as a glitch.

I hate to agree: the military is at fault because they did not confirm their suspicious with DCA, thus national security was compromised.

I have been inside the ATC room in DCA Subang Jaya. The military ATC is just next to it! (same room but partitioned) mad.gif  mad.gif
*
military atc there is specifically for military aircraft landing there including those of other nations. But i also quite surprise, if that close, how come there could be communication problem unsure.gif
thpace
post Mar 19 2014, 12:26 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(HangPC2 @ Mar 18 2014, 03:03 PM)
Nanti sapa nak bagi Kroni Projek..
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Ni apasal kat kedai runcit ni doh.gif

kalau kat gudang.. masih ada standard.. ni kedia runcit? laugh.gif
thpace
post Apr 15 2014, 12:25 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(LTZ @ Apr 15 2014, 12:20 PM)
Will replace starburst.....starburst no more in service for quit sometimes. See...the gap is there. VSHORADS is the last resort, for last layer....we need the 1st layer.....

Kesian tgk ade gapu yg pakai 40/70 tu....dah la manual. Kena pusing2 pakai tangan je.... aim pun manual. Standard gun atas PC dlm navy je
*
basically malaysia air defense relies heavily of fighter aircraft rolleyes.gif

jernas used to defend air base saja?
thpace
post Apr 15 2014, 09:34 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(LTZ @ Apr 15 2014, 07:30 PM)
Because the funnel (exhaust) at waterline.....if gray colour it will become black also by the smoke
*
any reason why navy still hesitating to switch gas turbine instead of diesal?

if i not mistaken, gas turbine ships can move faster
thpace
post Apr 24 2014, 11:19 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(azriel @ Apr 24 2014, 09:01 AM)
No SAM?
*
Nama missle covertte but no vls system
no ciws also

it like malaysia always get the short sticks until even outside country offer such low spec to us
QUOTE(kinabalu @ Apr 24 2014, 09:50 AM)
user posted image

kesian our kedah class,
Armament baru:
1 x 76 mm Oto Melara
1 x Oto Melara / Mauser 30mm short-range gun
2 x 12.7 Machine Guns

no ASW, no SAM, nothing....
*
sweat.gif sweat.gif sweat.gif
like last time case.. china missile frigate come.. most of our patrol boat can do is ikut ikut belakang. We post an insignificant treat to them rolleyes.gif
thpace
post Apr 24 2014, 11:22 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(kinabalu @ Apr 24 2014, 11:21 AM)
Yeah but the table change when it was not our PV tailgating them but our TAR class sub.
*
we wont know about that, need ltz to confirm ada ikut tak?
thpace
post Apr 24 2014, 03:07 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(LTZ @ Apr 24 2014, 12:08 PM)
China...not yet. But US yes.....
*
apasal ikut ally pulak instead of china laugh.gif


QUOTE(LTZ @ Apr 24 2014, 12:09 PM)
Really2 sad to see NGPV sail with only PC standard armament...even some PC got missile.
*
Nak cakap nanti ada hardcore tak happy.. but with tat price

if got satu biji ciws still aceptable la.. Ni satu pun tak ada

oni point defend capabilities, no area defense but 3000 ton.. dunno letak apa dalam until so heavy but armament oni standards. Batu ? sweat.gif
thpace
post May 15 2014, 12:53 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(LTZ @ May 15 2014, 12:30 PM)
Why last tuesday the special forces doc still showing the same LRP..... suppose to show china special forces right?? Penat tunggu je....
*
survey their training kah? brows.gif
thpace
post May 20 2014, 01:10 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
If china put at malaysia water, i wounder will our timid PM will made a hu ha or just "tak pa lah, kita nego sama mereka"

I am sure the military tops sure wondering, ni orang atas kepala betul ke tak rolleyes.gif
thpace
post May 21 2014, 03:14 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(azriel @ May 20 2014, 08:52 PM)
PT-91M Pendekar - Majalah 3 Episode 16 - 2014.


*
just realized the gun mass so high until have to stand?
thpace
post May 21 2014, 04:37 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(azriel @ May 21 2014, 09:00 AM)
IMO the position of the HMG is too high. Almost the entire body of the commander/machine gunner is exposed. Here is a comparision of the HMG mounted position between the Polish Twardy & Pendekar.

Polish PT-91 Twardy:

user posted image
PT-91M Pendekar:

user posted image
*
tinggi nya.. Easy sniper target sad.gif

QUOTE(yinchet @ May 21 2014, 02:50 PM)
RTM is way worse than majalah 3.
Well at least some of the majalah 3 documentary were quite ok.
Anyway on these pt91 documentary not much content and a few scripts errors here and there .
at least do some spec introduction and intro about the tank origin would have been better.
*
Not surprising, now their documentary even cover random things

no like in 90s, really educational
thpace
post May 22 2014, 01:10 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ May 21 2014, 11:52 PM)
Thats what I think too.. but exposing a tank commander to enemy fire is stupid

Put rcws, I think can put at the back of the turret on the bustle area
*
3/4 of the body is out laugh.gif

so big target no even need to aim at commander head. doh.gif

Wonder will we ever get more tanks
thpace
post May 27 2014, 11:25 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(LTZ @ May 27 2014, 04:31 PM)
Ok tq.....different term airforce & navy
*
then what navy term?

our gomen? Joke... national defense is lowest priority... macam mana nak kasih brim next year if still stay in power

if brim give to national defense.. banyak benda can beli

5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0631sec    0.78    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 05:35 PM