yeah..ayam too a bit disappointed that misc agreed to pay the ransom..missed the chance to see dem spec ops in action..then Indo forumers bashing us saying us pengecut n etc..

eh bro..y u replied to urself?

how much does france offer for the used Tigers?

lol..must be the same guy that wrote Anwar Ibrahim as MB in wikipedia..no politics intended..

if u google a bit, u can see Mil helicopters have more crash case than any European heli,
cheaper yes,
tough no,
easier to maintain, idk bout that, they say russian spare parts are very hard to get

so is Mi-17, crashed mainly bcoz of technical issues..
i dun like blackhawk anyway

a quote from Georgia's Mindef which decided to change all russian helos in their arsenals to American utility helos
>>Defence Minister explained the reason for replacement of the Soviet helicopter fleet by the U.S. ones. "It is very expensive to maintain the Soviet helicopters. Procurement of the spare parts is problematic and in most cases it is practically impossible to get this service without corruption deals. Considering all the above-mentioned facts we took a hard but right and logical decision," declared Irakli Alasania."
sos

do Vietnam and Cambodia produce the spare parts? no

our air force will pick M-17V if there is no issue, but they didn't..and i believe there are strong reasons for why they didn't pick Mi-17..and choose more expensive Eurocopter..
it is normal for helicopter to crash, but would u pick a car that have more bad safety records than pick another car that's a bit expensive but rather better safety record?

demmm~ straight away with long-range SAM..take it slow man..lets start with BUK-M1E first..
i'm actually more interested in China's missiles..heard their missiles have more range than US and Russian missiles..but cost is still a concern..
will it be cheaper if we provide the chassis for the missiles (like ACV-300 or K200 IFV)?

This post has been edited by kerolzarmyfanboy: Feb 2 2014, 12:51 AM

they only have a few and how do u know they dun have any problem?

Iraqi's T-72 cannot be compare to Russian T-72..Iraqi T-72 is called Lion of Babylon/Assad Babil and it was outdated by 10-15 years when fighting US's M1 Abrams..their T-72 also lack modern components like night vision, etc..and the tank gunner lacks marksmanship..some military analyst reject the saying that M1 > T-72 if they only take Iraqi Assad Babil as reference..
still, idk if the same can be said to syria though as idk if they use Assad Babil too or T-72 from Russia/Poland/Ukraine/China...many videos showed FSA insurgents able to blow the T-72's turret away (i dun think they use rpg7, probably RPG-29/31 or Kornet or Metis-M)

ada wang, ada drone
takda wang, well, u can always train the dolphins here to carry laser

or kurita



This post has been edited by kerolzarmyfanboy: Feb 5 2014, 05:18 PM

auww.. what a waste..

i couldn't agree more..imo, it's better to create a medium-sized specialize marine force like what we did to our elite airborne 10 Briged Para instead of large divisional-size marines like USMC..better just train the army with amphibious training rather than creating a whole new military branch..

i think better u join wataniah..still got the army environment and feels..M16 training and stuff..i missed kawad kaki n kawad senjata..
RELA u can only hold T-baton..lel

i thought the employee can sue the employer who prevent him/her from joining Wataniah exercise?

try it on your employer...blom cuba blom tau maa..

wow..i mean..just wow..Indo are that advance already..

jelly gilerrrr dgn Indo~~~

all super high-end MRCA..impossibruuuuu!!
that way Indo would be more powerful than PLAN and PLAAF

even under PM dept, i dun really see much modern ships in APMM assets..all old one like WW2 punya torpedo boat..with most of their assets are not even combat/patrol ships, most of them are legacies from civil agency like Jabatan Perikanan, present dari TM n stuff..wth, we using fishing boats to guard the sea..? man...

nowadays tank still use 105mm?