Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Financial Cukai Pintu Explained, Cukai Pintu/Assessment Rate issue in KL

views
     
grifterfmj
post Jan 6 2014, 05:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(MyKLTalks @ Jan 6 2014, 04:46 PM)
Thanks for asking!

Before I answer these questions, let's get a few things straight so we are all on the same page.

To say the Cukai Pintu is increased is not entirely true. The Annual Value is increased and the Assessment Rate Percentage is decreased.

The formula for amount of Cukai Pintu or Assessment Rate paid is this: Cukai Pintu or Assesment Rate  = Annual Value or Nilai Tahunan X Assessment Rate Percentage.

One factor goes up and another one goes down. Some owners will pay less and some will pay more, depending on how much the increase of their Annual Value as compared to the decrease in Assessment Rate Percentage.

Now, on to your questions:

1. There are two components to your question. First is the last time there was an Annual Value revision was in 1992. All this while, all these properties were charged the Assessment Rate based on that old value. Since then, the value of these properties have increased. So when there is a revision, 21 years later on any property, of course the value goes up. The second component is the increasing cost to cover the increasing operating expenditure and development expenditure. Yes, cost has increased and even with more property units paying Assessment Rate, it is not enough to cover the shortfall.

2. More people staying in KL whether in high-rise property or landed ones means more strain on the upkeep and maintenance of facilities and amenities. For example, roads - City Hall spent a lot just to maintain roads. If more people use them, then the maintenance cost would also soar.

3. Yes, as outlined in the Annual Budget Speech by the Mayor, there are many plans with the funds to improve and upgrade existing facilities and amenities with the aim to make and maintain KL as a world class city.

Any other questions, please ask us or engage us on Twitter (@mykltalks), FB: fb.com/mykltalks and our website: mykl.com.my
*
In that case could you please explain

1. What is the justification for the increase, cost from 1992 - 2014. Cost has increased granted but by how many %? and of that cost how much is actually used for maintenance as per increase in yoy cost? You can't tell me cost has increased by 10% then turn around and give the datuk bandar big fat bonus (of course cost is going to increase la)

2. The reason why our roads cost so much to maintain is because the job is not done properly in the first place and secondly there is not stop korek korek korek everyday also korek like our roads have gold underneath. But if maintaining the roads is such a high cost what pray tell is costing so much? (paving? tar? labor?)

3. I hope I live to see the day KL can be considered a world class city but at the moment the gripe seems to be with wastages, corruption and just total lack of trust that the funds would be put to good use. Anyway you said some would pay more some would pay less, could you please elaborate with an example.

Thanks.



grifterfmj
post Jan 6 2014, 11:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
Ok how about of the RM199.7 million spent in 2013 to handle garbage how was this money used? Which part of KL required the most expenditure, which part of garbage collection is outsourced, how many trucks need to be in operation. If the root cost of rising cost is INEFFICIENCY then DBKL is just passing the buck right. Nowadays we are expected to do more with less, so why can't DBKL.


grifterfmj
post Jan 6 2014, 11:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(MyKLTalks @ Jan 6 2014, 11:44 PM)
All DBKL accounts are audited. If you have any tangible evidence as to inefficiency, please lodge a complaint to DBKL using the information we have provided earlier.
*
What evidence do you want? Take a look around and open your eyes, the main angst on the hike is because many people perceive DBKL to be incompetent and inefficient by providing an inadequate level of service.

I am telling you DBKL is inefficient, you tell me to lodge report. rclxub.gif

I am not asking you whether or not their accounts are audited, I am asking you how was the money spent? Instead of raising the cukai is it not possible DBKL can reduce their costs?
grifterfmj
post Jan 7 2014, 12:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(MyKLTalks @ Jan 6 2014, 11:55 PM)
Such allegations would require documented proof. There are departments handling complaints within DBKL itself. You can help DBKL provide a better service by complaining to them officially and going through the proper channels.
*
Catch 22 isn't it? I tell you there is damning evidence DBKL is inefficient, you turn a blind eye and tell me to provide proof and tell me to report to a department within the organization which is inefficient in the first place. Aren't we just going round in circles now?

You throw out stats like RM199 million spent on collecting garbage, yet.. you can't even justify to me whether or not this RM199 million is a) necessary b) spent efficiently

Example:

Worker: Boss I need a raise, rising cost going up lah
Boss: Sure, but I have to tell you the quality of work is not up to standard, please improve you want to be recognized as world class right? you need to be more efficient too and spend wisely
Worker: Boss, please provide proof and write in and complain to my secretary kkk? icon_question.gif
grifterfmj
post Jan 7 2014, 10:31 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
Spend spend spend but

a) KL roads still flood and full of potholes
b) River still dirty like sewer
c) Honestly we don't need ITIS, just get everyone to use Waze
d) You build so many recreational centers yet Malaysian's are still obese!

and the final straw is now you come back and say, "OH cost is going up we need more tax"

Simple analogy la, you go to a mamak and order milo ais, the milo ais taste like water, then the owner says tomorrow we are increasing price because harga gula naik, you'd probably boycott that mamak til the end of time. If the mamak served you a decent milo ais that you love and enjoy very much, you would gladly pay because "hey, harga gula naik ma"

Maybe we should all boycott KL and move to PJ..

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0995sec    0.56    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 12:14 PM