xf 35mm





This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 11 2014, 11:57 AM

take lower shutter speed.for me 1/30 is enough..

btw another news of fuji x pro 2 and x200 full frame.can it 'succeed' like sony a7 series?

http://petapixel.com/2014/04/03/yet-anothe...l-frame-x-pro2/

This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 12 2014, 01:12 AM

staring



This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 14 2014, 11:17 AM

do u mean the sharpness?

oh. maybe u are getting defective unit.and maybe u can send to fuji for a other unit

i own xf 35mm but hearing to what you said that xf 23 is not sharp at 1.4,im quite surprise

makes me holding back from getting xf 23 haha

This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 14 2014, 07:59 PM

latest review on xf 56 as compared to canon 85mm 1.2.rm3k lens vs rm8k lens

im quite shock when he's saying that the image quality of xt1 is closer to a full frame (in this case 5d mark 3)

http://andrewvanbeek.com/fuji-vs-canon-lenses/

This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 16 2014, 02:10 AM

his major frustation is the misfocus problem with x pro 1.well this is main weakness of earlier generation of fuji camera including mine,x-e1.honestly im quite frustrated with the focusing system in xe1 when paired with most complained xf lens regarding AF system xf 35.

this is only when i magnify the image to 100% then only i could see the mis focus especially when shooting people face. maybe i need face detection on the camera

luckily the frustration covered by the superb image quality of the camera and the lens. i've never regretted my decision buying it

maybe the xt1 has fixed the problem nice one! can u share how to shoot it?

This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 16 2014, 03:34 PM

why always shoot f4? i always use 1.4 btw. i just cant resist the bokeh

maybe there is something wrong with my shooting skill

btw the latest tele conversion for x100/x100s.

it looks big

http://www.fujifilm.eu/eu/news/article/new...the-x100-x100s/

have u asked mr oss?

very few of my long exposure shoot that quite satisfy me.the boat appeared to be blurry because i hand held the shutter button for 90 second.really need shutter release

yeah. i think so. maybe due to water current itself.now i felt that 16mm is too tight for seascape landscape. maybe it's time for xf 10-24mm?

This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 17 2014, 04:08 AM

yeah.im foreseeing myself will be having same feeling if i get the 10-24 .it looks big.maybe almost similar to nikon 24-70.lol.

maybe getting samyang 12mm f2.cheaper and got faster aperture.not sure either i'll be used to the manual focus lens or not

This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 17 2014, 12:19 PM

it's a great lens IMO. the contrast,the sharpness,colour and the way it renders noise at high iso just spectecular

the only lens that i own. i mostly using it to shoot outdoor. but indoor bit tight especially taking group photo. for that xf 23 maybe suits ur needs

This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 17 2014, 02:11 PM

ohh.i dont either the 3mm difference will make a different as i havent tried the zeiss but im sure the difference in aperture between 1.4 and 1.8 makes lot of difference especially shooting in low light condition. but the 3D looks that xf 35 created just impress me.luckily i havent sold it yet





This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 17 2014, 03:04 PM

anyone who owns xf 18mm can give some opinion and lens on the lens perfomance? the lens quite underrated based on the review on the web.

the chromatic aberration,softness at edge at f2.

but when i justify the price and portability (almost similar to x100) ,i just cant resist it.yet still hesitate

oh. what about the other performance? i mean the contrast, colour rendition etc?

sory if im asking too much

another xf 23 poison!

really poisoning. but the noise quite visible

btw how often u use ur xf 18-55? is it xf 23 alone enough for travelling?