QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Dec 10 2013, 10:48 AM)
Thanks for the input man

Mind elaborating on the problem with RAW processing with LR?

Is it because the XE-2 is not supported yet? Or?
I think I will be more comfortable with the kitlens haha, its a pretty good lens to start with~
Perhaps later on only invest in the prime

No worries. Well, for the RAW processing, LR wasn't able to demosaicing the x-trans raw as others bayer raw. In short, the direct RAW converted x-trans files are softer than the jpeg output and the color reproduction is also a little off. I am using LR5.3 RC which listed to support X-E2. This is a typical problem that faces by most of the Fuji X users. If you are not die hard fan of LR or RAW shooter, this is not an issue. But too add on, using Photo Ninja or Iridient (for Mac only) would be a better off in x-trans raw processing which you can get sharper image. When I have some free time, I will post some comparison on LR, PN and OCC files.
I am not sure if you have any experiences in photoshooting. It surely good to start of with kit lens, but no worries the 18-55 is not normal kit. I would say it is a high quality kit as compare to the 16-50. With the kit, you can try to use a fix focus range (i.e. 18mm, 23mm, 35mm or 55mm) to understand if you are comfortable on using either one of those range. Once confirm, then you can pull your trigger on getting one of those prime or the 55-200mm

. So, go try it out before you make up your decision.
Honestly speaking, I was hoping if fuji will launch a 50-150 f2.8 OIS lens and not overly expensive. Then I can fully retire my canon gear

.
Besides, if you are a DSLR user, you may need some time to get use to the EVF which personally I feel better on fuji X-E2 EVF as compared to EM-1 or Alpha 7. Not sure why, it is just the feeling

...
Oh, not sure if any sifus here were using the EF-42 flash. Was thinking how well is Fuji flash work as compare to canon. Was hoping to use that with the 55-200mm if I cannot hold of my GAS

.