QUOTE(jepertine90 @ Mar 18 2014, 01:36 PM)
Hi guys,
I'm planning to upgrade my kit lens, and I have 2 lens in mind.
Rather than browsing the review site, I would like to ask the experience of the user here.
Current lens in Mind would be the 2 famous comparison standard zoom, 3 may be, the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VC and non VC also the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8.
Noise(auto focus) doesn't bother me much, but my main concern is the VC and the dust issue that my friend warned me about Tamron lens.
He got the Sigma one, and I've tried it and it is wonderful. However it is too heavy in my taste, as I'm more on walking and traveling, food photog kind of hobbyist.
I can't justify between between these 3 lens, which includes:
Tamron VC - Moderate pricing, quality ok, dust problem? Can fund a 50mm or 85mm for protrait with the saved $$
Tamron non-VC - superb cheap, no VC(might do some video), saved money and fund another prime. Can fund a 50mm or 85mm for protrait with the saved $$ or even throw a speedlite that I always wanted.
Sigma - Rm1.9k, super good in all aspect, but too heavy? a little expensive, but is it worth it?
Dilemma to the max. Some wise advice and justification would be nice. Getting either of these this coming Saturday for my Japan trip Next month.

if me...i will pick tamron non-vc
a lot ppl comment that the non-vc is more sharp than the vc one (provided it not a lemon copy). then it also lighter and smaller compare to the vc one. most important also it cheaper compare to the VC one.
i own the vc before, the VC in this lens is a bit diff from the VR in nikon lens. after u pre focus, the lens mirror will shake n stable. the important point is you need to wait it stop then only can capture. if you straight away snap, it will give u blur image instead of clear one.
so in the past, most of the time (day time) i will shoot with VC disable. only in low light environment then will enable it.
the 50mm at the tamron also can be a good potrait lens in dx body

no idea about the sigma...so no comment