
Thank you sifu Agito for the tip
Nokia PV 808, HDR + Photoshop panorama
This post has been edited by realjazzcoke: Apr 8 2015, 02:08 PM
..๑۩ Camera-Phone Shots Gallery [V12] ۩๑.., spam spam spam photos only.
|
|
Apr 8 2015, 12:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2015, 02:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Apr 8 2015, 01:56 PM) i might need crop a bit for the left part black area there, i think is a bit too much for the black there. Thanks for the input sifu, correcting now |
|
|
Apr 9 2015, 12:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Apr 8 2015, 03:40 PM) i dont think HDR function is boosting lighting in dark area lel.... true oso sifu, and you are right on the HDR theory, i admit im using the HDR at night in the wrong way lol, but come out pretty good i must say in general (minus the dark places), need more experiment on the ISO next time when i have the chance again to do it again^^more likely HDR is for some overexpose places but you want to have well lit area for some minor dark place... ah well maybe it is just phone camera sensor is too small XD PS. i do hope that i have a PANASONIC DMC-CM1 phone to test the 60sec exposure on 1" sensor for this scene LOL |
|
|
Apr 10 2015, 02:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Apr 10 2015, 01:39 PM) HDR is combining minimum 3 exposure to boost dynamic range... ie bring out details on shadow and highlight area. Agreed:) especially on " ie bring out details on shadow and highlight area." this is my intention of this test shots^^ Not a good photo but the only one I have at the moment. I used HDR to keep the highlights of the convenient store and boost the shadows which will otherwise be just pure black IMAG0011 by vmwt, on FlickrI find the overall exposure on shadows and highlight are much more even (without overblown or too dark), but without a BSI sensor, capturing ultra-low dim light is harsh for 808 (which is old FSI type by the way) Actually i would like to extend this HDR+panorama idea to create beach shots, but soon i realized is not possible to capture natural wave pattern across the screen LOL, still i would like to try once if i have the chance again~ Wow, how i missed Taiwan already just by seeing your post, just been there last year (and get trigger happy to take photo everyday haha)^^ By the way nice shots from you bro. keep em' coming ![]() Nokia PV 808, Photoshopped This post has been edited by realjazzcoke: Apr 10 2015, 02:06 PM |
|
|
Apr 11 2015, 08:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Apr 15 2015, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 22 2015, 03:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
May 7 2015, 10:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
May 8 2015, 10:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(dembaba9000 @ May 8 2015, 02:49 PM) Hope u enjoyed ur trip in Bangkok. Thanks:) Already came back from there.Mi Note good for casual shoots I guess, serious mobile photography they're still behind the likes of Nokia, Apple, Samsung, and the upcoming LG G4. Mi Note is actually doing a pretty good job at camera department too at such price tag (and near flagship specs). If there are more manual settings for Mi Note camera, Im sure it can get serious too^^ I find your Mi Note's night shots at Chocolate Ville & Asiatique are better compared to 808 in terms of overall dynamic range (And i think most of your shots are handheld and not using tripod, correct me if i'm wrong ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Nokia PV 808, some stock some photoshopped. |
|
|
May 9 2015, 10:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(dembaba9000 @ May 8 2015, 10:49 PM) Yeap all hand held. I find shots within 1/4 seconds usable, by my standards of course. The manual mode is pretty comprehensive. Take shutter speed as an example, it can go up to 32 sec lol. I feel you, this is what happens when you are following a group. Went there with a group on a tight schedule no time to fiddle with manual.Sad. Looking forward to see the potential of 32 sec, especially on busy road at night QUOTE(Andrewtst @ May 9 2015, 09:35 AM) Finally, the flagship of the year Image quality was pretty good too, even on high ISO (800 at least to me). Getting better and better these days Care to check which camera sensor your S6 Edge are using? this time around the S6 Edge was equipped either with SONY IMX 240 or ISOCELL, click on the link below to see what is the differences between both sensors. http://www.lowyat.net/2015/05/samsung-conf...camera-sensors/ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Photoshopped ![]() Nokia PV 808, all stock, 1 photoshopped. |
|
|
May 22 2015, 11:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
May 29 2015, 10:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(MjMax15 @ May 25 2015, 09:38 AM) No, there is something special, i saw monkey! LOL QUOTE(huislaw @ May 28 2015, 08:54 PM) nice view to try out iPhone 6's panorama. Can i know what is the time while you take this shot? would like to try a shot when i have the chance to visit penang again^^ Newer phones are so good (instant pano), unlike the old 808 have to take the shot first then post process with Photoshop, if any of the frame shakes, no second chance...sigh...[url=http://www.huislaw.com/2015/05/an-evening-at-penang-hill-bukit-bendera/]</a> Nice Pano btw and thanks for the info on your blog:clap: QUOTE(Andrewtst @ May 29 2015, 12:06 AM) Indeed, the colour is much richer and deeper (and better^^) compared to the dim sum earlier, just slightly washed out (maybe due to soft lighting), still nice food shots for both Now, some shots at bangkok SIAM PARAGON, i went there early so just shooting around: ![]() Photoshopped ![]() Stock ![]() Stock Nokia PV 808 This post has been edited by realjazzcoke: May 29 2015, 11:06 AM |
|
|
Jun 25 2015, 11:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 25 2015, 03:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Jun 25 2015, 12:18 PM) can get more longer shutter but i canot hold with bare hand that stable lol... and that position is very dangerous lol. Better dun play play lor like tat because i use balcony fence to stable my phone, and if drop, that straight drop into pool downstair with 10+ floors lol and G4 is for my dad, i still use m7 For handheld consider not bad liao (coz from the photo it just shows a little shake), with the help of OIS I still uses phone strap for situations like yours (safety 1st), too bad smartphones nowadays doesn't have this "function built-in"... |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 12:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 26 2015, 09:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2015, 02:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Aug 3 2015, 12:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(khaiandrew @ Aug 2 2015, 12:30 AM) Nice one, the scene can be much more dramatic if slow shutter were used and with tripod^^given if this is the performance of a handheld 1/15 sec (ISO 1000), it is indeed impressive |
|
|
Aug 6 2015, 02:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Aug 17 2015, 11:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
490 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(FluffyTee @ Aug 15 2015, 03:42 PM) Hey can i get everyone's opinion? Took a few night scene photos. 3 sets of photo, each shot with 2 camera phones. Hi, here are my 2 cents for the comparison which do feel is better? If u guys have time, please compare full size vs full size at flickr. 3 pairs (A/B) Not sure if the arrangements are correct or purposely disarranged (the last set): a. 1A,2A and 3B are simply better in details and white balance, although overall looks dimmer compared to Phone B- Lets just call it Phone A b. Where else 1B,2B and 3A not just showing inconsistent white balance in each scene, brighter overall scene (a little too much), but lastly the lost of finer details, smudged (you cant even see the grass clearly in 1A for example) - Phone B If both phones are using the similar ISO & shutter speed in Auto, Phone A leads all the way, but if its not, lets just say Phone A are better in handling various low-lighting situation while preserving as much detail as possible, brighter scene doesn't always better. I would rather preserve as much detail as possible, then work the dim area with Photoshop later. That's for me by the way Lastly, price point, if the gap is huge between the two, i must say Phone B is actually doing a decent job here, but not better. Thanks for sharing the photos This post has been edited by realjazzcoke: Aug 17 2015, 11:38 AM |
| Change to: | 0.0474sec
0.64
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 08:38 AM |