Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Proton Saga SV / FLX fuel consumption

views
     
Effy92
post Nov 7 2013, 10:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
294 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Malaysia



QUOTE(bojek @ Nov 7 2013, 10:14 PM)
Wow. I dare not drive until tank empty. normally drive till 2 bar left then go for refill.
Am driving Saga BLM 1.6 manual.

normally driving in highway 70% town 30% will return me 280-330km.
BTW, when the oil gauge starts to blink, how many litre left?
*
Not really empty. afaik when it start to blink still have around 8 litre left.
Jusb
post Nov 8 2013, 04:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


FLX SE - 330KM on first fuel warning indicator bliking.
alumax14
post Mar 24 2014, 01:59 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


Saga FLX 1.3,I pump RM60 for 230km to reach indicator blinking,driving in PJ, does my car has a problem? COz the FC is too terrible,I can see each bar for only 32km and I am not even a heavy pedal person. Any comment?

This post has been edited by alumax14: Mar 24 2014, 02:00 PM
alanyuppie
post Mar 24 2014, 02:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,834 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: here


QUOTE(alumax14 @ Mar 24 2014, 02:59 PM)
Saga FLX 1.3,I pump RM60 for 230km to reach indicator blinking,driving in PJ, does my car has a problem? COz the FC is too terrible,I can see each bar for only 32km and I am not even a heavy pedal person. Any comment?
*
Thats what I hate about these indicator (each bar not equal in size). made me wonder if each of them represent an equal amount of fuel used. Last week been driving a BLM to work and rm40 can get about 170 km. From 2 bar left, pump rm40 to reach 5bars only. The 5th bar took pretty long to drop down (70km) , the 4th bar can tahan less than 55km only. The 3rd bar is worse.... about 45km I think.

This post has been edited by alanyuppie: Mar 24 2014, 02:11 PM
wyman1991
post Mar 24 2014, 04:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: May 2007


My colleague drives teh saga flx. He complains to me about his poor fuel consumption.

Only 10-12km per litre on a full tank. Even my 1996 1st gen toyota camry can achieve that easily.
popopi
post Mar 24 2014, 04:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,197 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


Saga FLX SE 1.3...




Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
hurricane21
post Mar 24 2014, 11:41 PM

Senior Probation
******
Senior Member
1,389 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Southern Region


FLX SV, just pass 10k service, using Petronas 95
Always pump RM50 when left one bar
Everyday go work around 70km return trip
If light footed (maintain 60-80km/h, rev around 2k to 2.3k), can get around 320km
If vroom vroom drive like mad all the way only around 260km

This post has been edited by hurricane21: Mar 24 2014, 11:41 PM
Aquariusdenz
post Mar 25 2014, 02:17 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,533 posts

Joined: Aug 2007


QUOTE(alumax14 @ Mar 24 2014, 01:59 PM)
Saga FLX 1.3,I pump RM60 for 230km to reach indicator blinking,driving in PJ, does my car has a problem? COz the FC is too terrible,I can see each bar for only 32km and I am not even a heavy pedal person. Any comment?
*
Always stuck in traffic jam? My FLX 1.3 CVT is quite equal for all bars. If i drive around city, worse is RM50 doing 280km. Smooth traffic can do 300+km. Try go SC to have a check. Because RM60 for 230km is very bad comparing to my friend's BLM auto which doing 300km for rm60.
alumax14
post Apr 17 2014, 10:14 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


That is why, RM60 for 220-240km from my car,is so annoying.Test so many times also the same amount of 28-35km per bar in city drives.That is just very very "TERRIBLE" la.I try to pump and drive a smoother road,still same FC.

Never get a Proton anymore,heartache ady~
Jusb
post Apr 17 2014, 11:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(alumax14 @ Apr 17 2014, 10:14 AM)
That is why, RM60 for 220-240km from my car,is so annoying.Test so many times also the same amount of 28-35km per bar in city drives.That is just very very "TERRIBLE" la.I try to pump and drive a smoother road,still same FC.

Never get a Proton anymore,heartache ady~
*
Usually you can still drive another 50 km after the first time fuel low indicator appears.
SUSsupersound
post Apr 17 2014, 01:34 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(alumax14 @ Apr 17 2014, 10:14 AM)
That is why, RM60 for 220-240km from my car,is so annoying.Test so many times also the same amount of 28-35km per bar in city drives.That is just very very "TERRIBLE" la.I try to pump and drive a smoother road,still same FC.

Never get a Proton anymore,heartache ady~
*
Well, Proton still worth something, as long as it is not Proton chasis + Campro engine. Campro + Mitsubishi engine still the best from my point of view. My Wira even stuck in heavy jams also can about 13km/l. And now my Inspira 1.8M also doing slightly better than 13km/l. But my friend's Preve CFE even with light foot also can't come close to 11km/l.
ericmaxman
post Apr 17 2014, 01:50 PM

-
*******
Senior Member
7,951 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(alumax14 @ Apr 17 2014, 10:14 AM)
That is why, RM60 for 220-240km from my car,is so annoying.Test so many times also the same amount of 28-35km per bar in city drives.That is just very very "TERRIBLE" la.I try to pump and drive a smoother road,still same FC.

Never get a Proton anymore,heartache ady~
*
A myvi is better for fc. smile.gif
Effy92
post Apr 17 2014, 04:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
294 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Malaysia



QUOTE(alumax14 @ Apr 17 2014, 10:14 AM)
That is why, RM60 for 220-240km from my car,is so annoying.Test so many times also the same amount of 28-35km per bar in city drives.That is just very very "TERRIBLE" la.I try to pump and drive a smoother road,still same FC.

Never get a Proton anymore,heartache ady~
*
Your foot too heavy or maybe your can still below 10k km mileage? Or maybe you idle too long in your car?

I can get at least 400km per full tank RM70 with saga cvt at PJ city.
Effy92
post Apr 17 2014, 04:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
294 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Malaysia



QUOTE(supersound @ Apr 17 2014, 01:34 PM)
Well, Proton still worth something, as long as it is not Proton chasis + Campro engine. Campro + Mitsubishi engine still the best from my point of view. My Wira even stuck in heavy jams also can about 13km/l. And now my Inspira 1.8M also doing slightly better than 13km/l. But my friend's Preve CFE even with light foot also can't come close to 11km/l.
*
Preve CFE is CVT how to compare with manual.
SUSsupersound
post Apr 17 2014, 05:04 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Effy92 @ Apr 17 2014, 04:27 PM)
Preve CFE is CVT how to compare with manual.
*
Is it? But all the sellers are using this to boast it has better FC performance compare to manual whistling.gif
Are you trying to say that they are actually cheating people hmm.gif
Effy92
post Apr 17 2014, 06:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
294 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Malaysia



QUOTE(supersound @ Apr 17 2014, 05:04 PM)
Is it? But all the sellers are using this to boast it has better FC performance compare to manual whistling.gif
Are you trying to say that they are actually cheating people hmm.gif
*
Maybe if compare to 4speeder cvt is better in term of FC.
iskazulka
post Apr 18 2014, 08:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: May 2012


PLEASE READ THIS :

QUOTE(lhwj @ May 16 2013, 03:15 AM)
CVT can be more efficient than manual because:

1. The engine can always be revving at the most efficient speed, while for fixed ratio gearboxes the engine typically doesn't stay in the efficient powerband a lot of the time.

2. There is no interruption while accelerating. Even the fastest manual shifters will still have a spilt second when the engine is not driving the wheels between shifts.

3. If you drive a manual properly, you would rev match a lot. Pressing the throttle in neutral or with the clutch disengaged is just wasting fuel.

There are some points for manual driving:

- When accelerating, if you are too slow you waste fuel by not covering ground fast enough, too fast and you also waste fuel by spraying an unnecessarily rich mixture which does not translate into acceleration. I believe there are two different ways which people feel the throttle, first is press to a fixed point immediately and wait for the revs to catch up, the second is to gently ease up the revs while pressing the pedal. The latter is definitely more efficient. Change up when you feel the engine has reached its sweet spot.

- When to shift up? I personally don't think there's a fixed point such as 2,000 RPM. It depends on the traffic situation and road condition. For example if traffic is moving slowly then I shift up really early, by 40 km/h I'm already in 4th gear (gentle acceleration) (bear in mind your Getrag has taller ratios than my Aichi Pockai). If it's an open road ahead then I tend to drag gears a little longer, because if I shift too early, the engine will be well below the efficient torque band, which brings us to the next point...

- Use the correct gear for the correct condition. Ever ridden a multi-speed bicycle? Your car engine feels exactly the same as when you're pedaling a bike. I think people who have spent a lot of time cycling are more efficient manual drivers as they understand the principles of gearing. The first thing to know is that lower RPM does not necessarily mean better efficiency. The low RPM = efficient rule only applies if you're cruising at a constant speed or accelerating *very* gently on flat ground or going downhill. For going uphill, you probably already know that you need to rev higher by using a lower ratio. For example, climbing up a moderate slope at 40 km/h in 4th gear which on my gearbox will give me about 2,000 RPM. With that ratio, you probably have to open the throttle quite a bit to maintain that speed, so a lot of fuel is pumped into the engine but the ratio is too high and you may feel the engine struggle to maintain that speed. However if you climb the same slope at 40 km/h but in 3rd gear, your revs will be closer to 3,000 RPM and you don't have to open the throttle as much as you did in 4th gear, so it's actually more efficient even though your engine revs are higher.

Also other points regardless of gearbox:

- Anticipate the traffic in front of you. Look beyond the car directly in front and observe the traffic flow. My favourite way to measure how well you do this is to watch the brake lights of the car in front and count how many times they brake compared to how many times you brake. I find that generally, for every 5 or 6 times the car in front brakes, I only brake once. Remember that braking converts your car kinetic energy into heat and every time you brake, you have to accelerate and burn fuel to regain your speed. Therefore a driver who brakes minimally is an efficient driver. You must use your brakes when necessary, such as coming to a stop but generally, drive in a manner which minimises braking. In heavy traffic, accelerate gently. Don't attempt to block vehicles cutting in front of you. If you see a red light in front, lift off the throttle and coast.

- The most efficient cruising speed is around 80-90 km/h. Any faster and your engine will be wasting power unnecessarily on overcoming drag from air resistance. Following this rule I managed to hit 546 km on about 34L, gogoman86 who has done 600+ km on a tank will probably tell you the same too.

- If your time is flexible, avoid traffic jams. It's a 20 km drive to office for me every day. In the mornings if I leave at 7 or 8 am, it takes an hour to get to office. However after 9 am the time is reduced to less than half an hour. As for coming home, the earliest time I leave office is 7 pm, because before that various places will be congested. I can leave at about 6+, but I choose to stay to 7+ just to beat the jam.

- Watch the air cond thermostat. The colder your setting, the more often the compressor has to run and more fuel will be burnt. For me, the warmest temperature and blower speed 1 will suffice at night and early morning, during mid-day blower speed 2 and thermostat somewhere in the middle. Also I wait for the engine to warm up first by driving a few kilometres before turning the air-cond. The engine is thirsty when cold and there's no need to add additional load then.

- Generally engine oil has negligible difference on consumption. Been on 15w50 from new until 50,000 km, then switched to 10w30 but I don't think that has improved my consumption. My previous 546 km on a tank and also 20 km/L achieved on a midnight run with davidke20 were on 15w50. 

- There's only a certain amount you can do to improve your consumption. When I lived in PJ I could consistently hit below 8L/100 km and get 400-450 km a tank (sometimes more, especially with trips to KLIA), however here in Penang I normally get about 8-8.5L/100km due traffic lights every few hundred metres. I've tried really hard, following all the points mentioned above and going as far as switching off the engine at traffic lights (manual stop-start) but it's still very hard to get below 8L/100 km on this Island. The Campro engine is thirsty by nature and initially available only with poor gearbox choices, but now with the CVT and Getrag manual you guys are better off than us stuck with the older gearbox. So don't feel overly frustrated if your figures are not looking good, apply all the points above and if you're really fed up, sell the Gaga and buy a BiBa / Mirage / secondhand Sawi.

- If you haven't already done so, go sign up for an account at www.fuelly.com so that you can log and analyse your consumption over time.
*
iskazulka
post Apr 18 2014, 08:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: May 2012


QUOTE(alanyuppie @ Mar 24 2014, 03:09 PM)
Thats what I hate about these indicator (each bar not equal in size). made me wonder if each of them represent an equal amount of fuel used. Last week been driving a BLM to work and  rm40 can get  about 170 km.    From 2 bar left, pump rm40 to reach 5bars only. The 5th bar took pretty long to drop down (70km) , the 4th bar can tahan less than 55km  only. The 3rd bar is worse.... about 45km I think.
*
don't rely on saga fuel level gauge.

QUOTE(davidke20 @ Jun 10 2012, 02:23 PM)
Out of all the gauges, fuel level gauge is 1 of the most unpredictable gauge. It's float weight NOT calibrated, some car lighter, some heavier. My case is heavy, tend to give me illusion of petrol saving. When car is travelling, my fuel gauge doesn't go down. My 1st bar normally can last up to 80km before it lesap. After I stop my engine, the float settled then it become 1 bar less.

Some lighter float like dares case, up hill, hilang 1 bar, downhill 1 bar extra, go flat road, back to normal again.

Really can't tell how many km before the alert indicator lite up.
*
QUOTE(hurricane21 @ Mar 25 2014, 12:41 AM)
FLX SV, just pass 10k service, using Petronas 95
Always pump RM50 when left one bar
Everyday go work around 70km return trip
If light footed (maintain 60-80km/h, rev around 2k to 2.3k), can get around 320km
If vroom vroom drive like mad all the way only around 260km heavy foot lettew
*
light footed is not described as maintaining 60-80km/h, is how long the meter is traveling from 0km/h and so on.
even u maintain 60-80km/h, but if from 0km/h to 80km/h from stop is fast e.g 2-3 seconds rather than 20 seconds, it's considered heavy footed.
fyi, my fl when left 1 bar, actual full pump is around 28.57L = rm60 or 30L = rm63.
ur rm50 fuel pump is only 23.81L.

QUOTE(Aquariusdenz @ Mar 25 2014, 03:17 AM)
Always stuck in traffic jam? My FLX 1.3 CVT is quite equal for all bars. If i drive around city, worse is RM50 doing 280km. Smooth traffic can do 300+km. Try go SC to have a check. Because RM60 for 230km is very bad comparing to my friend's BLM auto which doing 300km for rm60.
*
as a senior owner, you should encourage new owners having a fuelly acount, not calculate based on fuel meter gauge.

inb4 my 2 cents
Aquariusdenz
post Apr 18 2014, 09:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,533 posts

Joined: Aug 2007


QUOTE(iskazulka @ Apr 18 2014, 08:32 AM)
don't rely on saga fuel level gauge.
light footed is not described as maintaining 60-80km/h, is how long the meter is traveling from 0km/h and so on.
even u maintain 60-80km/h, but if from 0km/h to 80km/h from stop is fast e.g 2-3 seconds rather than 20 seconds, it's considered heavy footed.
fyi, my fl when left 1 bar, actual full pump is around 28.57L = rm60 or 30L = rm63.
ur rm50 fuel pump is only 23.81L.
as a senior owner, you should encourage new owners having a fuelly acount, not calculate based on fuel meter gauge.

inb4 my 2 cents
*
Yes sir. notworthy.gif
OCMAX
post Apr 19 2014, 07:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
858 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


I'm driving Saga FLX. After a while I felt the car became sluggish. Just install E-Drive and felt instant different. Will see how the FC next week. smile.gif

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0258sec    0.91    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 11:52 PM