Yesterday I was talking to my elder brother, who has retired and has tonnes of money in FD. He is a very risk aversed guy, so the bulk of his money is in FD. I asked him the above question.
He told me FD is not actually that bad. Those who say FD cannot cover inflation is not entirely accurate. He said that income doesn't equal to expense. So if your FD principal is big enough, you can still beat inflation in absolute amount. I run a simple scenario on his theory :
FD - 3.5%, Inflation - 3.5%, Putting FD is worse off ?
He has FD for eg. RM1.2m as principal. Each year he makes RM42k = RM3.5k pm
His expense is for eg. RM2k pm = RM24k pa. So, he still has RM1.5k left over to roll into FD. While the price of goods increases every year, his income also increases. Repeat it over 20 years, he still has positive RM3.5k yearly or ~RM300 pm extra to cover his inflated expenses. And his FD principal has grown into RM1.46m
So, the trick is to have a FD principal that is large enough, and it still can cover inflation. Comparing % may be just the trick of financial planners who try to convince you to buy their products
Apr 15 2014, 08:25 AM
Quote
0.0211sec
0.48
7 queries
GZIP Disabled